I agree with the sentiments expressed in this video. However, the word:
race should be replaced with the word:
culture. The climax of post-Enlightenment Western state sanctioned slavery was the end of legalized slavery in America, an event which also concluded the since the dawn of time socialized and politicized ownership of human beings as commodified property.
The end of the many millennium long run of state sanctioned slavery; or slavery for use as a political and social weapon of internal oppression and the disposing of conquered peoples , also coincided with the inception of the politicalized use of the ideological term and meme: racism, as a weapon of intercultural warfare between peoples possessed of differing inherent traits, ethnic origins, belief systems or traditions, coexisting as citizens within the borders of the same nation or empire. In many meaningful ways, the word: racism--and its use as a cultural and social weapon--was intended to replace ideologically, the ancient real-world practice of slavery; in order to accomplish the same oppression as slavery and to the lay the groundwork for state instituted race war and eventually, a worldwide war of cultural replacement of the West.
Who was the politically weaponized concept of racism intended to be used against? The irony of the answer to this question is as sharp as the efficacy of the concept's double edged sword to cut both ways: to do as much political and cultural damage against the so-called victim of racism as to the so-called racist himself. Racism as concept, as anti-philosophy and as definition of practice, was created as a magic bullet of potent enough caliber to bring down the big game breeds of white European imperialist derived post-Enlightenment regimes, and, the biggest Western civilizational game of all: the US of A.
On every global and civilizational strata of historical dominance imaginable--from academic proliferation of pro-democratic societies to unmatched military power--white western empires have commanded the entire world for many centuries. Non-white cultures on the other hand, have been historically unable to either resist or counter-dominate white-dominated imperial expansion, either militarily or economically.
Enter the concept of racism.
In order to strike back against the white-dominated West, and unable to do so with direct violent or economic counteraction, non-white civilizations only means of effectively doing so was to launch a worldwide war of cultural replacement. A war whereby the ancient generational white people (and their cultures) of Old World Europe and generational settlers of North America would be replaced--with slow but increasing speed over decades and then year by year--by masses of refugees from south of their southern borders.
The catalyst, or the concept which was to enable this world cultural war against the West and ensure its eventual success, continue to be the concept of: racism. Without racism enabled intercultural race warfare used as a political, social and philosophical weapon, extreme Leftist Western regimes, through dissemination of the ideological concept of racism from liberal dominated universities, would never have been able to program students: future academics, professionals and politicians, to become cultural revolutionaries who would spread the false narrative of racial hatred and teach and incite guilt and self-hatred for being white.
In all likelihood, the concept of racism, its politicization and use as a weapon, and the presently intensifying world cultural replacement war against the West on every civilizational level, are all a campaign of revenge for centuries of white civilization led imperialism. In other words, we who are white--or predominantly white, are being attacked racially, culturally and politically for the so-called "sins-of-our-ancient-fore-father's" against non-white cultures. The instigators of this world cultural replacement war expect white culture folks to one, accept the superiority of non-whites across the social and cultural spectrum, and two, to despise our own skin tone, heritage, religion and white created governments so deeply, that we work together to bring them crashing to the ground of historical deletion.
Alas, the full weight of the regretful truth lies in the fact that inherently, no differing skin tones hate each other. The only aspect of divergent mistrust and source of interracial turmoil lies in the clash of incompatible cultures--some of which truly cannot coexist together within the bounds of small geographical areas without oppressing or slaughtering each other. A popular policy of largely Western liberal governments has for centuries been to force cultural integration to the great detriment of societies.
Perhaps saddest of all is the truth that we should all be Americans first, divided cultures never.
In my opinion any combination of "races" can peacefully and meaningfully coexist to the benefit of their societies. However, peoples of different cultures possessed of radically different languages, religions, traditions and ideologies must not be forced to integrate with one another, if one of said cultures vehemently resists assimilation into the majority culture's ways of doing things--at least on a political, legal and public level.
Of course, so long as racism is used as a weapon against majority peoples in Western civilizations--such as whites; and so long as the world war to culturally replace white heritage, governmental structure and the people themselves--who are the majority generational citizenry of most of their nations--rages on, there can be no completely peaceful and socially mutually beneficial intercultural coexistence.
ppression and being bigoted towards oppressed minorities. Do you really not understand that?
