R
rdean
Guest
Dexter cancer patient who called health care 'unaffordable' will save more than $1K | The Detroit News
Boonstras old plan cost $1,100 a month in premiums or $13,200 a year, she previously told The News. That didnt include money she spent on co-pays, prescription drugs and other out-of-pocket expenses.
By contrast, the Blues plan premium costs $571 a month or $6,852 for the year. Since out-of-pocket costs are capped at $5,100 for in-network doctors and hospitals, including deductibles, the maximum Boonstra would pay this year for all of her cancer treatment is $11,952.
When advised of the details of her Blues plan, Boonstra said the idea that it would be cheaper cant be true.
I personally do not believe that, Boonstra said. (Maybe "I refuse to believe I've been duped by Republicans?")
Paul Ryan: Full Stomach, Empty Soul
72 percent of households that benefit from the SNAP program include children, and 2.2 million children are lifted out of poverty by governmental assistance programs such as SNAP. The National School Lunch Program benefits 3.1 million children [PDF] who might otherwise have gone hungry with a half day of school still ahead of them. And many of the children who receive lunch at school rely on this as the only meal they know will be served everyday. Soul-crushing? More like life-saving.
Meanwhile, members of the U.S. Congress such as Ryan are being dealt their own soul-crushing blows, since they, too, benefit from a nutritional assistance program.
The nonprofit Sunlight Foundation, which gathers data to make government more transparent, discovered last June that the House spent about $2 million in taxpayer dollars on coffee and catered food for guests. At $95,000, Republican Kevin McCarthy of California spent the most (how demoralizing for him!), including $4,000 on bottled water alone.
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUNzQGIXr3I#t=13[/ame]
Ryans skin not only crawls at the idea of providing children one reliable meal a day, but believes that it will take the dignity away from these children. Because all children with empty stomachs care about is their dignity, right?
-----------------------------------------
Thank God those "needy" millionaire Republicans are "eating for free". So which works better? Fooling a gullible cancer patient or insisting poor children are better off hungry?
And Republicans say I lie. How do they explain these things? I didn't "magically create" these people.
Boonstras old plan cost $1,100 a month in premiums or $13,200 a year, she previously told The News. That didnt include money she spent on co-pays, prescription drugs and other out-of-pocket expenses.
By contrast, the Blues plan premium costs $571 a month or $6,852 for the year. Since out-of-pocket costs are capped at $5,100 for in-network doctors and hospitals, including deductibles, the maximum Boonstra would pay this year for all of her cancer treatment is $11,952.
When advised of the details of her Blues plan, Boonstra said the idea that it would be cheaper cant be true.
I personally do not believe that, Boonstra said. (Maybe "I refuse to believe I've been duped by Republicans?")
Paul Ryan: Full Stomach, Empty Soul
72 percent of households that benefit from the SNAP program include children, and 2.2 million children are lifted out of poverty by governmental assistance programs such as SNAP. The National School Lunch Program benefits 3.1 million children [PDF] who might otherwise have gone hungry with a half day of school still ahead of them. And many of the children who receive lunch at school rely on this as the only meal they know will be served everyday. Soul-crushing? More like life-saving.
Meanwhile, members of the U.S. Congress such as Ryan are being dealt their own soul-crushing blows, since they, too, benefit from a nutritional assistance program.
The nonprofit Sunlight Foundation, which gathers data to make government more transparent, discovered last June that the House spent about $2 million in taxpayer dollars on coffee and catered food for guests. At $95,000, Republican Kevin McCarthy of California spent the most (how demoralizing for him!), including $4,000 on bottled water alone.
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUNzQGIXr3I#t=13[/ame]
Ryans skin not only crawls at the idea of providing children one reliable meal a day, but believes that it will take the dignity away from these children. Because all children with empty stomachs care about is their dignity, right?
-----------------------------------------
Thank God those "needy" millionaire Republicans are "eating for free". So which works better? Fooling a gullible cancer patient or insisting poor children are better off hungry?
And Republicans say I lie. How do they explain these things? I didn't "magically create" these people.
Last edited by a moderator: