Which part of the US will succumb, to SEA LEVEL RISE, first?

Eh? Mind the crusading, then. Piggie Shitz up the wall has a fez on.
 
Monsanto scientists need to engineer some smart PLANTS, to zap these brain-eating, climate change-denying, redstate-retard, wingnut-idiot, Obamney-voting, living-dead ramblers, known as ZOMBIES:

FCburial02.gif


shaun_of_the_dead_zombies.gif


tumblr_lruipspH1I1qg39ewo1_500.gif


C6A9EFE67E.gif


tumblr_lzuz5xANcF1qg39ewo1_500.gif


---------------------

As anybody knows, unless we re-green, with smart plants, which are variously fatal, to ZOMBIES, humans are in trouble.

The heat leads to fire, which zombies don't fear, but it kills them, humans, and plants. Zombies are also too stupid, to fear Woody Harrelson. Get a clue about the Tallahassee Lawnmower, living-dead, climate change-denying, wingpunk-fucktards! Woody does headshots, and for the sequel, I bet he gets a flame-thrower, and then the sea level rises, and he drowns.

See: ZOMBIELAND.
 
Florida is being nibbled away now, I don't see all the way under until the end.
Care to present the photographic proof?

If there is sea level rise, there is photographic evidence.

Whatcha got?
slr-2.jpg



Not a real good level of understanding there.

What you need to show is a photo from 1900 or earlier of a particular shore line with a landmark of some type and then show the same spot from the same angle with the evidence that there has been sea level rise.

Again, whatcha got?
 
Those who aren't brain-dead deniers will appreciate this.

Rising sea level a threat to East
Boston Globe
David Abel, Globe Staff
June 25, 2012
(excerpts)

As temperatures are projected to climb, polar ice to melt, and oceans to swell over the coming decades, Boston is likely to bear a disproportionate impact of rising sea levels, government scientists report in a new study. The seas along the East Coast from North Carolina to New England are rising three to four times faster than the global average, and coastal cities, utilities, beaches, and wetlands are increasingly vulnerable to flooding, especially from storm surges, according to the US Geological Survey study published Sunday.

“Cities in the hot spot, like Norfolk, New York, and Boston, already experience damaging floods during relatively low-intensity storms,” said Asbury Sallenger, a Geological Survey oceanographer and lead author of the study in the journal Nature Climate Change. “Accelerated sea-level rise,” he said, will add to “the height that storm surges and breaking waves reach on the coast.” The findings come as Boston and Massachusetts officials are taking the first of a range of responses to the threat of rising seas. The report did not project how much levels would rise in the Northeast, but globally, oceans are projected to increase between 2 feet and 6 feet by the end of the century, and as much as an additional 5 feet during the heaviest storms. Climate scientists say such storms are likely to increase in intensity and frequency over the coming decades.



Are there any words in this article that indicate to you that the guys who wrote this know less about the climate than Holder knows about ethics?
 
Those who aren't brain-dead deniers will appreciate this.

Rising sea level a threat to East
Boston Globe
David Abel, Globe Staff
June 25, 2012
(excerpts)

As temperatures are projected to climb, polar ice to melt, and oceans to swell over the coming decades, Boston is likely to bear a disproportionate impact of rising sea levels, government scientists report in a new study. The seas along the East Coast from North Carolina to New England are rising three to four times faster than the global average, and coastal cities, utilities, beaches, and wetlands are increasingly vulnerable to flooding, especially from storm surges, according to the US Geological Survey study published Sunday.

“Cities in the hot spot, like Norfolk, New York, and Boston, already experience damaging floods during relatively low-intensity storms,” said Asbury Sallenger, a Geological Survey oceanographer and lead author of the study in the journal Nature Climate Change. “Accelerated sea-level rise,” he said, will add to “the height that storm surges and breaking waves reach on the coast.” The findings come as Boston and Massachusetts officials are taking the first of a range of responses to the threat of rising seas. The report did not project how much levels would rise in the Northeast, but globally, oceans are projected to increase between 2 feet and 6 feet by the end of the century, and as much as an additional 5 feet during the heaviest storms. Climate scientists say such storms are likely to increase in intensity and frequency over the coming decades.

Are there any words in this article that indicate to you that the guys who wrote this know less about the climate than Holder knows about ethics?

No, asshole. Would codepunk or other zombies like to specify just exactly how SLR is supposed to play out, given uncertainty, in the chain of events, starting with:
1. GHG emissions, which are accelerating;
2. Warming, which is steady but accelerating;
3. Glacial melt, which is steady but accelerating;
4. Exchanges, which will back up, leading to accelerating SLR!!

Sea level rise may be 25 m, over several hundred years, or it might be 50 m, over a couple hundred years. When we know how currents and washovers go, and how fast they damage subsiding lands, we will gradually find out, what happens, during runaway global warming, during climate change.

You are a zombie and a bitch, codepunk. Just what the fuck do you think you know? EATING BRAINS AND RAMBLING ON is all you know.
 
Code, temperatures were 'projected' to climb in the southwest. The prediction is several decades old. So, have they climbed in the southwest? Care to ask any of the firefighters there that question right now?
 
Today's massive thunderstorms killed 13; NE Florida, plus SE Ga., are still under severe flood warnings. INLAND water is the big problem now.
 
Today's massive thunderstorms killed 13; NE Florida, plus SE Ga., are still under severe flood warnings. INLAND water is the big problem now.

As this summer progresses, if we see a repeat of the last two years, 2010, and 2011, I think it safe to say that we are starting to see the predicted climate change, with attendent disasters. Disasters that will increasingly affect agriculture and require increasing amounts of our national and personal income to ameliorate.
 
Care to present the photographic proof?

If there is sea level rise, there is photographic evidence.

Whatcha got?
slr-2.jpg



Not a real good level of understanding there.

What you need to show is a photo from 1900 or earlier of a particular shore line with a landmark of some type and then show the same spot from the same angle with the evidence that there has been sea level rise.

Again, whatcha got?
If it's real, it's a high tide with storm out to sea. I'm not totally convinced of photoshopping.

Second, we don't know the year of the photo, but has to be after mid 1990s due to the car types on the road.

Thirdly, it proves nothing as a stand alone other than it being bad seas out there. Small craft warning, gale warning, hurricane watch. All are possible, with nothing to do with glowbullshit warming.

Lastly, we don't know where that really is except it is on an ocean coast.

Oh and as a ps... if ocean levels are rising in one spot, shouldn't they be rising globally? Isn't sea level globally univesal, or it's not 'sea level'? And before you try that BS argument that it's "backing up" in an area, that means its dramatically dropping some where else, doesn't it because that area is not being replentished.
 
Last edited:
Jesus! Storms in Summer!

Jesus Fucking Christ!

Does it ever end?

We never had storms in the summer when Earth was in Balance before the invention of the Internal Combustion Engine
 
Today's massive thunderstorms killed 13; NE Florida, plus SE Ga., are still under severe flood warnings. INLAND water is the big problem now.

As this summer progresses, if we see a repeat of the last two years, 2010, and 2011, I think it safe to say that we are starting to see the predicted climate change, with attendent disasters. Disasters that will increasingly affect agriculture and require increasing amounts of our national and personal income to ameliorate.

And all of this ANECDOTAL hysteria is due to what? The last 0.25degC temp rise since 1990? A warmer Gulf?

DISASTERS in 2011 happened because of tornadoes tearing up city CENTERS instead of barns..

Certainly, from a meteorlogical POV -- our problem LATELY has been with the JEt Stream MORE THAN the last 0.2degC rise in temp that triggered all of your apocalyptic visions.

You should reserve those for the future. Otherwise the wolf-crying could get you eaten.
 
So we have the usual deniers flapping yap, but what do the people that deal with extreme weather on a daily basis have to say?

http://www.munichre.com/app_pages/w...s/durban_2011/press_folder_durban_2011_en.pdf

The number of major weather-related natural
catastrophes has almost tripled since 1980. The
number of flood loss events has gone up by a factor of
more than three, and the number of windstorm natural
catastrophes has more than doubled.
 
NONE ! Gawd and GeeZiss will continue to bless the holy murka and rise her up and protect her for her good deeds, maintaining peace and faithfulness to hiM !:eusa_hand:
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoPAL6Ta6TQ]Adaptation of turtle beach Junquillal to climate change (by CAVU and WWF, 8 min English version) - YouTube[/ame]
 

Forum List

Back
Top