]
Yeah? And? Dumbass, did I say controlled demo violates the laws of physics? No, dumbass. The "evidence" you manufacture to "prove" controlled demolitions does, however, dumbass.
And did I mention you're a dumbass?
well actually, Dave.. you said
nothing of the sort. you said
"I believe the theory that doesn't violate the laws of physics "but fine..lets break this down Dave..how does the evidence I manufacture to prove controlled demolition violate the laws of physics ?
Y'know, if you didn't think your ludicrous theories really do violate the laws of physics, you wouldn't be wetting your pants so much now. Dumbass.
As for explaining it to you, all you will respond with is "Nuh-UH!!", so I really don't see any need to spend time trying to convince you of something when you've made it quite clear your mind is closed. Other people have presented you with facts and logic, and you want nothing to do with them.
Enjoy your delusions. Dumbass.