Yes it IS a constitutional issue, because you are being DENIED something others can do for no reason. I would call that......discrimination.
Well, no, not really. There's a whole shitload of things they can throw you off college for that wouldn't be criminally actionable. You know, like 'Not getting good grades". or "Being flat ass drunk and asleep during class every day because you are partying too hard."
So folks, now Joe is whining about the Chicago PD. Yes, I heard of John Burge too, but I have a question-------------> did you hear about the Daly 2nd cousin or whatever he was, who killed someone outside a nightclub, and basically got off?
Hmmmmmm, by the way, who has run Chicago for about 50 years? Talk about totalitarian!
Meh.... Okay besides the fact that the Daley Cousin was convicted of a crime (just not a very serious one), it doesn't take away from my original point. WE DO convict people on merely someone's word. So a university is pretty much justified in expelling a student based on someone's word if they find that word credible.
And now finally, Jose' wants to be a vigy, AKA vigilante. He doesn't care what the law says, he doesn't care about rules, if he or his friendly Marxist proffesors think someone needs punished; even without any evidence, well then good ole Jose' AKA Joe, is all for it. He wants to stigmatize a man, on the word of a woman, even if there is not one shred of evidence, or if the evidence shows she is lying. This is why Obama put this forward, because in the real world, we have EQUAL PROTECTION under the law. Now Jose' wants to REMOVE that from men on campus, because he knows so much.
Okay, again, the thing is, the University is not responsible for the "constitutional rights" of a student. Their paramount concern is the safety of the student body in general.
If they have good evidence that Little Timmy gets a bit rapey when he's at a frat-party, they have an obligation to protect the other students from him.
And now finally, Jose' wants to be a vigy, AKA vigilante. He doesn't care what the law says, he doesn't care about rules, if he or his friendly Marxist proffesors think someone needs punished; even without any evidence, well then good ole Jose' AKA Joe, is all for it. He wants to stigmatize a man, on the word of a woman, even if there is not one shred of evidence, or if the evidence shows she is lying. This is why Obama put this forward, because in the real world, we have EQUAL PROTECTION under the law. Now Jose' wants to REMOVE that from men on campus, because he knows so much.
This isn't a matter of law. When you enroll in a campus, you agree to abide by their rules. When you take a job, you agree to abide by their rules.
This is why leftists/Marxists are dangerous people. When they do NOT like a law like deportation for illegals, they demand you ignore it, and make every excuse why the won't (because they can't) change it. But when they want to PANDER to certain groups, sometimes they want to OVER REACH the law, while denying others their rights.
Well, no, the reason why the laws on illegals are ignored is because they are unworkable. They can get in faster than we can throw them out. We throw them out, they sneak right back in. Now, on other threads, I've told you my solution to this problem. But they actually involve holding the rich people who cause the problem accountable.
Our founders were brilliant people. Jose' and his friends are MARXISTS trying to deny MEN their rights. But don't think it is just men, hell.......they want to send men into the womens room, and deny them their privacy. It is how they destroy a civil society, by using CHAOS!
Dude, it's hard to keep track of all the rabbit holes you want to run down. The Founders shit in chamber pots and thought leeches were a good medical treatment.
We have to live in the real world of 2017.
In that world, women who say they were raped usually were.
Some people aren't the gender they were born into.
And immigration laws that worked in 1950 don't work today.
