When was President Trump convicted to cause impeachment?

[Faun]

Who can they call as witnesses to defend president Trump' s illegal actions in the Ukraine?

And why not simply ask for these witnesses to be brought in now, if they are relevant?

Joe and Hunter Biden for beginners, and because right now they don't have subpoena power THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING DEAL.

Please quote the law that states a president is not allowed to request help from a foreign gov't in possible corrupt dealings with a former vice president WHILE he was in office.

Thanks in advance.

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value.

He asked the Ukrainian president to provide a service for him of investigating his political rival.

Services have value.

 

[WEATHER53]

He’s never even been under “criminal investigation” Mueller spent almost three years eagerly seeking to place him there but was so fact absent that he could not
Meanwhile, Durham in less than 6 months is rolling out a slew of criminal investigations.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Joe and Hunter Biden for beginners, and because right now they don't have subpoena power THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING DEAL.

Please quote the law that states a president is not allowed to request help from a foreign gov't in possible corrupt dealings with a former vice president WHILE he was in office.

Thanks in advance.

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value.

He asked the Ukrainian president to provide a service for him of investigating his political rival.

Services have value.

Biden running for president now does not absolve him of being investigated by the current president for illegal activity while VP in the past. Being one of 10 people running against Trump doesn't give him a get out of jail free card.

 

[busybee01]

Just because you don’t like the POTUS, doesn’t mean he should be impeached.

If you don’t think Brennan lied to the FBI and the FBI slurped it up, you probably also don’t think that the Clinton Foundation was operated as a pay for play organization.

So odd their donations fell so much once she lost the election. I guess all disease and famine on earth have been eradicated? Or is it because they can’t sell political favors.

There is no evidence of anything you say.

There is no evidence that Brennan lied to the FBI and there is no evidence that donations to the Clinton Foundation went down significantly in 2017?

Come on.

Why are you lying about something so provable?

https://nypost.com/2018/11/24/donations-to-clinton-foundation-plunged-after-hillarys-defeat/

Back in March, Brennan lied about indictments coming down from Mueller. He is a liar.

Brennan Predicts Mueller Report, More Indictments On Friday: "I Don't Have Inside Knowledge"!

The DOJ is in Republican hands and it has already launched one politically inspired investigation. Waiting for the second.

 

[busybee01]

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value.

He asked the Ukrainian president to provide a service for him of investigating his political rival.

Services have value.

Biden running for president now does not absolve him of being investigated by the current president for illegal activity while VP in the past. Being one of 10 people running against Trump doesn't give him a get out of jail free card.

You also have to have even a suspicion. You don't start a investigation just to start a investigation There is no illegal activity to investigate and that is clear to see.

 

[busybee01]

Yes but the simple question is:
What treasonous act has President Trump been convicted?
What bribery act has President Trump been convicted?
What other high crimes and misdemeanors acts has President Trump been convicted?

The Constitution is clear:
The requirements to impeach a president are found in Article II, Section IV of the Constitution.
"It states that the President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and
conviction of, treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

A) There has been NO impeachment because
B) There has been NO conviction, because
there have been NO Treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors even made about President Trump!

HE HASN'T BEEN CONVICTED BECAUSE IN ORDER TO CONVICT HIM HE WOULD FIRST HAVE TO BE IMPEACHED. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO BE TOLD?

The Constitution is clear: "shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction for Treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors"

I'm simply asking WHAT
1) TREASON?? Zero
2) Bribery??? Zero
3) Other high crimes and misdemeanors" Zero

There has been NOTHING proving President Trump has done any of the above!

So again... WHAT are the reasons for impeachment? Nothing!

This isn't an impeachment, despite what the little Goebbels of the fascist media say. The Soviet Star Chamber of Adam Stalin-Schitt is 100% political. It is intended to alter and influence the 2020 election. Schitt and the Stalinists are running a taxpayer funded smear campaign. They have no intention of drafting articles of impeachment. This is just the democrats using the federal government to rig an election, once again.

The dims will be swept from the house over this. Regardless of proclamations from corrupt Obama judges.

That's correct, it is an impeachment inquiry, to gather evidence and facts on whether to impeach and the articles of impeachment if they choose. It could be just a Censure instead once the investigating part is complete and turned over to the judiciary committee.

Bullshit, it is a taxpayer funded smear campaign intended to influence and alter the 2020 election.

Nazi Piloshiti and Adam Stalin-Schitt should face criminal charges for racketeering and election tampering.

You are acting like the Nazi. You are also a idiot to boot.

 

[busybee01]

It’s absolutely fascinating to me that American citizens would prefer a corrupt intelligence apparatus just because their person lost an election.

There is nothing corrupt about our intelligence agencies. You want to corrupt them so they will say exactly what you and Trump want them to say.

 

[busybee01]

He’s never even been under “criminal investigation” Mueller spent almost three years eagerly seeking to place him there but was so fact absent that he could not
Meanwhile, Durham in less than 6 months is rolling out a slew of criminal investigations.

What it means is that the DOJ and Durham have been corrupted to go after Trump's political enemies. Durham might be the one who ends up in jail.

 

[airplanemechanic]

It’s absolutely fascinating to me that American citizens would prefer a corrupt intelligence apparatus just because their person lost an election.

There is nothing corrupt about our intelligence agencies. You want to corrupt them so they will say exactly what you and Trump want them to say.

LOL Ok. That would be why they're under criminal investigation now.

 

[WEATHER53]

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value.

He asked the Ukrainian president to provide a service for him of investigating his political rival.

Services have value.

Biden running for president now does not absolve him of being investigated by the current president for illegal activity while VP in the past. Being one of 10 people running against Trump doesn't give him a get out of jail free card.

Since the President is certainly not sacred nor exempt from any form of scrutiny, I wonder why a mere candidate would be?

 

[Dragonlady]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

The witnesses are all burying your hero's lies. That's why he keeps changing the story, and attacking the process. Neither the law, the witnesses or the process are on your side.

The only witness that matters is the President of the Ukraine. He has stated that there was no pressure and therefore no quid pro quo. Your investigation should have died right there.

Did you expect a man who is utterly dependent on President Trump's approval internationally to sit next to Trump in front of the American press and call the President a liar? But Zelensky made a point of saying that he still didn't have an invitation to the White House in that presser, which showed that he was, in truth, being pressured.

Can you post anything except bullshit?

He was not sitting next to the President during that phone call. You do know how telephones work, right? Or are you Canucks still using two cans and a string?

You can imagine shit all you want, but facts are facts.

You have lost and don;t even know it yet, not that it matters to you since you are a busybody with no real skin in our political processes. Right Canuck?

Zelensky was sittinig right next to the President at that press conference at the United Nations. I guess you didn't actually watch it. You just picked up the day's talking points.

Every person on earth has a stake in your politics because Trump is on the verge of starting WWIII with his insanity.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The requirements to impeach a president are found in Article II, Section IV of the Constitution. It states that the President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors..

What treasonous act has President Trump been convicted?
What bribery act has President Trump been convicted?
What other high crimes and misdemeanors acts has President Trump been convicted?

Would someone please tell me when President Trump was convicted?

Yeah, uh, sorry, but you're misreading this. The Constitution does not say the President has to have a criminal conviction in order to be impeached. The conviction required for him to be removed from office would be the trial in the Senate following an impeachment by the House.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

The witnesses are all burying your hero's lies. That's why he keeps changing the story, and attacking the process. Neither the law, the witnesses or the process are on your side.

I like how you confidently make statements about what's happening . . . in closed-door hearings the public, AND EVEN OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, are excluded from.

 

[toobfreak]

What treasonous act has President Trump been convicted?

Really really not being liked by the Democrats and for really screwing up all their plans and totally getting in their way.

What bribery act has President Trump been convicted?

Not being willing to take a bribe from the Democrats, or being bought out, sold out, scared or chased away.

What other high crimes and misdemeanors acts has President Trump been convicted?

Not acting presidential enough giving flattering speeches to crooked European fat cats, calling them out on the rug for their crimes in public and generally for having blond hair and fair skin instead of dark.

Would someone please tell me when President Trump was convicted?

About 3 months before the 2016 election when they finally realized this guy was the GOP nomination and was really running up against Hillary and could very likely BEAT HER!

 

[Faun]

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value.

He asked the Ukrainian president to provide a service for him of investigating his political rival.

Services have value.

Biden running for president now does not absolve him of being investigated by the current president for illegal activity while VP in the past. Being one of 10 people running against Trump doesn't give him a get out of jail free card.

LOLOL

Being president doesn't allow Trump to break that law.

 

[Faun]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

The witnesses are all burying your hero's lies. That's why he keeps changing the story, and attacking the process. Neither the law, the witnesses or the process are on your side.

I like how you confidently make statements about what's happening . . . in closed-door hearings the public, AND EVEN OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, are excluded from.

It's not uncommon in Congress to hold hearings where attendance is limited to committee members.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

The witnesses are all burying your hero's lies. That's why he keeps changing the story, and attacking the process. Neither the law, the witnesses or the process are on your side.

I like how you confidently make statements about what's happening . . . in closed-door hearings the public, AND EVEN OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, are excluded from.

It's not uncommon in Congress to hold hearings where attendance is limited to committee members.

Again I say, if you spend a lot of time trying to explain to the people why it's okay for politicians to not answer to them and keep secrets from them, you're doing it wrong.

 

[Lesh]

I like how you confidently make statements about what's happening . . . in closed-door hearings the public, AND EVEN OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, are excluded from.

ALL the members of the relevant Committees (Republican and Democrat...ya know...the ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES you speak of) are in those closed door meetings and it is a closed door meetings BECAUSE it is an investigation in which investigators would prefer that witnesses don't tailor their testimony to match what other witnesses have said.

 

[airplanemechanic]

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value.

He asked the Ukrainian president to provide a service for him of investigating his political rival.

Services have value.

Biden running for president now does not absolve him of being investigated by the current president for illegal activity while VP in the past. Being one of 10 people running against Trump doesn't give him a get out of jail free card.

LOLOL

Being president doesn't allow Trump to break that law.

Good because he didn't break it. You have presented absolutely no proof that Trump broke that law. You just quoted a law.

Thanks for playing.

 

[Faun]

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value.

He asked the Ukrainian president to provide a service for him of investigating his political rival.

Services have value.

Biden running for president now does not absolve him of being investigated by the current president for illegal activity while VP in the past. Being one of 10 people running against Trump doesn't give him a get out of jail free card.

LOLOL

Being president doesn't allow Trump to break that law.

Good because he didn't break it. You have presented absolutely no proof that Trump broke that law. You just quoted a law.

Thanks for playing.

LOLOL

Denial is not a river. Here's trump, violating that law...

"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..." ~ Donny Boo Boo​