When Science….Isn’t

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Combine politics and science, and all you get is politics.


"Listen to top scientists and editors from esteemed medical journals and you can’t help but conclude there is such a thing as a “scientific establishment.” And it’s been as corrupted by politics and misinformation as many in politics and the media.

In my 2017 investigation into “Fake Science,” Dr. Marcia Angell, the first woman to serve as Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, explained why she says a large percentage of published studies are not to be believed.

“I came to the New England Journal of Medicine in 1979,” says Angell. “Starting about then was when you saw the drug companies assert more and more control until finally they over the next couple of decades, they began to treat the researchers as hired hands. They would design the research themselves. You know you can do a lot of mischief in how you design a trial. Or ‘we'll test this drug and we'll tell you whether it can be published or not,’ and so if it's a positive study, it's published; if it's a negative study, it'll never see the light of day."

Watch my investigation into Covid-10 origins, separating fact from rumor.

That sentiment is shared by Dr. Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief of the British journal Lancet. In 2015, he wrote a scathing editorial saying, "Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue; science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.
Dr. Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief, Lancet

These scientists are joined by many others who say that industry and special interests have co-opted the research process, academic institutions, federal agencies and public health groups to such a degree that it can be impossible to get unconflicted, accurate scientific information. At the very least, it’s difficult to know what can be trusted and what should not.

This phenomenon was never more important than during the Covid-19 pandemic when so many voices are shouting “Follow the science!” and when perfectly valid opinions and scientific findings are being censored, silenced and controversialized by Big Tech and some in the media.

All of this helps explain what happened last year when President Trump took what seemed to many to be the perfectly reasonable step of ordering a halt to U.S. taxpayer funding of the Communist Chinese research lab in Wuhan that could have been the source of the Covid-19 pandemic."

What happened when Trump tried to stop U.S. funding for the Communist Chinese Wuhan Lab | Sharyl Attkisson

Listen to top scientists and editors from esteemed medical journals and you can’t help but conclude there is such a thing as a “scientific establishment.” And it’s been as corrupted by politics and misinformation as many in politics and the […]

sharylattkisson.com

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

At least home schoolers know that a man cannot become a woman by installing a permanent Halloween costume, eh?

But we did watch a lot of right wingers turn into lobotomized sheep by putting on MAGA hats. The research is ongoing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If one cannot repeat the process, and one doesn't know how the process works, it's time to "conclude" that such humans are tied to proving their agenda and nothing more.

But the reason you don't understand and cannot repeat any science is because you know less about any of it than a 4 year old, not because someone is trying to prove an agenda.

 

[Old Rocks]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Incredibly stupid spew. Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science. They don't believe in vaccinations, they do not believe in climate change, and they believe in a magic something or the other in the sky that is going to save them from the results of their own stupidity and stupid actions. And, no, Lysenko was not an offshoot of Darwin's work. It is people like you that are an echo of this kind of "science".

 

[Old Rocks]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Just because whomever hom skooled you didn't understand science enough to teach it to you doesn't mean that your random copy&paste about communism makes science invalid. Please don't try again.

You add so little to the conversation

Yep, it appears Taz is SERIOUSLY bereft of ANY sign of intelligence. Tragic.

Which is why these Boards are so instrumental in demonstrating the complete absurdity of the "intellectualism" of the American Taliban Left. Think of it. Prior to letting them post their vacuous "thoughts" they used to brag that they were the "intellectuals"

Frankie boi, how is that hollow moon going? Is it greys or reptilians running the place? Have you and PC figured that out yet? LOL

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Incredibly stupid spew. Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

You know, hacking off a man's penis and installing rubber tits does not make him a woman. Nor vice-versa a woman into a man.

I mean, you guys are extra stupid.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You know, hacking off a man's penis and installing rubber tits does not make him a woman. Nor vice-versa a woman into a man.

Yes, we know. Not being handicapped by hamhanded bigotry and a willingness to be cruel and stupid, we realize it is a matter of psychology.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

You know, hacking off a man's penis and installing rubber tits does not make him a woman. Nor vice-versa a woman into a man.

Yes, we know. Not being handicapped by hamhanded bigotry and a willingness to be cruel and stupid, we realize it is a matter of psychology.

Under the category of delusion. possibly.

 

[Dusty]

You know, hacking off a man's penis and installing rubber tits does not make him a woman. Nor vice-versa a woman into a man.

Yes, we know. Not being handicapped by hamhanded bigotry and a willingness to be cruel and stupid, we realize it is a matter of psychology.

You would be the expert on being handicapped

 

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Incredibly stupid spew. Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science. They don't believe in vaccinations, they do not believe in climate change, and they believe in a magic something or the other in the sky that is going to save them from the results of their own stupidity and stupid actions. And, no, Lysenko was not an offshoot of Darwin's work. It is people like you that are an echo of this kind of "science".

"Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science."


Really?


Let's check.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

You know, hacking off a man's penis and installing rubber tits does not make him a woman. Nor vice-versa a woman into a man.

Yes, we know. Not being handicapped by hamhanded bigotry and a willingness to be cruel and stupid, we realize it is a matter of psychology.

I like your new pumps.....but that muumuu has got to go.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Yes.

 

[Dusty]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Does it matter?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Does it matter?

OMG!!!



Another parrot....

 

[Dusty]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Does it matter?

OMG!!!



Another parrot....

Again what difference does Bruce Jenner's choice of underwear have in your life. If he wants to wear panties and call himself Kait, who cares

 

[PoliticalChic]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Does it matter?

OMG!!!



Another parrot....

Again what difference does Bruce Jenner's choice of underwear have in your life. If he wants to wear panties and call himself Kait, who cares

I know you're a moron, but it is unnecessary to prove it each and every day.



The Democrat Policy can be reduced to this:

Objections to the Transgender movement can be summarized as forcing everyone to participate in some people's delusions.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

Gender dysphoria, a conflict between a person's physical or assigned gender and the gender with which he/she/ claims to identify, is a mental illness.

Demanding that other people participate in the delusion is not a right, it is oppression.


How could you not know this?

 

[Dusty]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Does it matter?

OMG!!!



Another parrot....

Again what difference does Bruce Jenner's choice of underwear have in your life. If he wants to wear panties and call himself Kait, who cares

I know you're a moron, but it is unnecessary to prove it each and every day.



The Democrat Policy can be reduced to this:

Objections to the Transgender movement can be summarized as forcing everyone to participate in some people's delusions.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

Gender dysphoria, a conflict between a person's physical or assigned gender and the gender with which he/she/ claims to identify, is a mental illness.

Demanding that other people participate in the delusion is not a right, it is oppression.


How could you not know this?

You are also mentally ill if you are letting another persons choice of underwear influence your life. So do you believe that you are changing the World by posting your thoughts here perpetually? and if so, how?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Does it matter?

OMG!!!



Another parrot....

Again what difference does Bruce Jenner's choice of underwear have in your life. If he wants to wear panties and call himself Kait, who cares

I know you're a moron, but it is unnecessary to prove it each and every day.



The Democrat Policy can be reduced to this:

Objections to the Transgender movement can be summarized as forcing everyone to participate in some people's delusions.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

Gender dysphoria, a conflict between a person's physical or assigned gender and the gender with which he/she/ claims to identify, is a mental illness.

Demanding that other people participate in the delusion is not a right, it is oppression.


How could you not know this?

You are also mentally ill if you are letting another persons choice of underwear influence your life. So do you believe that you are changing the World by posting your thoughts here perpetually? and if so, how?

I am a servant of truth.


You and I don't speak the same language....

 

[Dusty]

Today Lysenko's are the "Conservatives" that don't believe in science.

Is Bruce Jenner a man or a woman?

Does it matter?

OMG!!!



Another parrot....

Again what difference does Bruce Jenner's choice of underwear have in your life. If he wants to wear panties and call himself Kait, who cares

I know you're a moron, but it is unnecessary to prove it each and every day.



The Democrat Policy can be reduced to this:

Objections to the Transgender movement can be summarized as forcing everyone to participate in some people's delusions.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

Gender dysphoria, a conflict between a person's physical or assigned gender and the gender with which he/she/ claims to identify, is a mental illness.

Demanding that other people participate in the delusion is not a right, it is oppression.


How could you not know this?

You are also mentally ill if you are letting another persons choice of underwear influence your life. So do you believe that you are changing the World by posting your thoughts here perpetually? and if so, how?

I am a servant of truth.


You and I don't speak the same language....

Who do you believe that you are serving truth to? and more important why do you believe that other people need to accept your version of reality and what should happen to the people that disagree with you