When Science….Isn’t

[justinacolmena]

Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile

Whether you have a pussy or a butthole and you can use up to ten boyfriends …

 

[Hollie]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Could you cut and paste something that defines “Darwinian science”?

Your cut and paste tirades tend to accumulate a lot of loopy, over the rainbow, ain’t comin’ back nonsensical slogans.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

You seem to have given up even the semblance of truth. Too many falsehoods to even respond.

So you couldn't find a single 'falsehood"?


Different day, same result.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. And the result of electing the modern day Bolsheviks, the Democrats, to Congress: The Equality Act

“As one of their first legislative achievements after winning a majority in the House during the midterms, Democrats passed HR 5, the Equality Act. Under the guise of extending the protections of the Civil Rights Act to the LGBTQ community, the Equality Act made the witch-hunting of heretics like Dr. Josephson a requirement of the law.” Horowitz




On Wednesday March 13, (2019)Nancy Pelosi introduced the so-called Equality Act, a bill that would add “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as protected classes under federal civil rights law.

1. The Equality Act would force employers and workers to conform to new sexual norms or else lose their businesses and jobs.

This is already happening on the state and local level. …high school French teacher was dismissed under the school’s anti-discrimination policy after he refused to comply with administrators’ orders to use a female student’s preferred masculine pronouns.

2. The Equality Act would force hospitals and insurers to provide and pay for these therapies against any moral or medical objections. It would politicize medicine by forcing professionals to act against their best medical judgment and provide transition-affirming therapies.

3. This politicization of medicine would ultimately harm families by normalizing hormonal and surgical interventions for gender dysphoric children as well as ideological “education” in schools and other public venues.

4. The Equality Act would ultimately lead to the erasure of women by dismantling sex-specific facilities, sports, and other female-only spaces.

Sexual orientation and gender identity laws that open up sex-specific facilities like bathrooms, locker rooms, etc. to members of the opposite sex enable sexual assault.

5. The Equality Act would also hurt charities, volunteers, and the populations they serve.

State and local sexual orientation and gender identity laws have shut down numerous faith-based adoption and foster care agencies across the country, in Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois, California, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia.

These states wrongly treated the belief that children do best with both a mother and a father as discriminatory, and kids are the ones who are paying the price. With 438,000 children languishing in foster care nationwide, we need more agencies working to help kids find homes, not fewer.” The Equality Act



“This bill would politicize medicine by forcing doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals to offer drastic not in view of new scientific discoveries, but by ideological fiat.” Heritage.





“The Trump administration absolutely opposes discrimination of any kind and supports the equal treatment of all," the official stated. "However, this bill in its current form is filled with poison pills that threaten to undermine parental and conscience rights.”
Trump opposes federal LGBTQ nondiscrimination bill, citing 'poison pills'

 

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Just because whomever hom skooled you didn't understand science enough to teach it to you doesn't mean that your random copy&paste about communism makes science invalid. Please don't try again.

You add so little to the conversation

Yep, it appears Taz is SERIOUSLY bereft of ANY sign of intelligence. Tragic.

Which is why these Boards are so instrumental in demonstrating the complete absurdity of the "intellectualism" of the American Taliban Left. Think of it. Prior to letting them post their vacuous "thoughts" they used to brag that they were the "intellectuals"

Intellectuals and Society, by Thomas Sowell

An Independent Mind

1. Unlike advocates of the more conservative, constrained vision, this intellectual vanguard tends to take the “benefits of civilization for granted.” The “vision of the anointed” lacks respect for the wisdom inherent in experience and common opinion. Its practitioners value abstractions—dreams for a peaceful, egalitarian world where conflicts have been overcome—over the “tacit knowledge” available to the parent, the consumer, the entrepreneur, and the citizen.
2. Sowell vigorously defends wisdom—practical reason—against an abstract rationalism that values ideas over the experience of actual human beings. Intellectuals, he argues, are particularly suspicious of the ties ordinary men and women feel to family, religion, and country. They look down upon “objective reality and objective criteria” in the social sciences, art, music, and philosophy. Their “systems” tend to be self-referential and lack accountability in the external world.
3. “And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” That's a pretty broad list of things to explain with job loss. Obama on small-town Pa.: Clinging to religion, guns, xenophobia

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. While those who go along with Leftist ‘science’ are paid handsomely, those who disagree face professional and personal punishments. Either you agree that men can be women…or woe betide you!



“Dr. Allan Josephson is the former chief of the University of Louisville’s Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology. In 2017 he presented his views on treating children who experience gender dysphoria at a Heritage Foundation event. He had previously expressed the same views as an expert witness in court cases.

In his speech Dr. Josephson challenged transgender orthodoxy—a progressive dogma. He said the “notion that gender identity should trump chromosomes, hormones, internal reproductive organs, external genitalia, and secondary sex characteristics when classifying individuals is counter to medical science.”

He further said that, “transgender ideology neglects the child’s need for developing coping and problem-solving skills necessary to meet developmental challenges.” He concluded by advising parents to listen to their children empathetically, and then “use their collective wisdom in guiding their child to align with his or her biological sex.” Horowitz, “Blitz,” ch.10



As is pro forma for the Left, any who disagree must be destroyed: he was fired.

“His salary and retirement benefits were also reduced. Meanwhile his outraged colleagues were unappeased and continued to attack and belittle him.

“They took all these retaliatory actions,” his lawsuit stated, “with an eye to ensuring that neither he nor anyone else dares to express viewpoints they find objectionable on medical and psychiatric issues.”



This was an ominous episode in an ongoing modern-day witch hunt, whose effect is to overthrow the standards and procedures that have created modern medicine and academic disciplines. The witch-hunters would replace scientific methods with dogma and an ideologically driven outrage that seeks not to refute the opinions it finds problematic but to destroy the individuals who express them, in effect burning the heretics at the stake.” Ibid.



Not very different, is it, from the treatment of those who say ‘all lives matter.’

 

[alang1216]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

You seem to have given up even the semblance of truth. Too many falsehoods to even respond.

So you couldn't find a single 'falsehood"?


Different day, same result.

"1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled. "

Falsehood 1: Soviet Communist Party was not the predecessor of the Democrat Party
Falsehood 2: Soviet Communist Party was not the model of the Democrat Party

The Democratic Party founded: January 8, 1828
Communist Party of the Soviet Union founded: 1898 as the Bolsheviks

Different day, different lies.

 

[justinacolmena]

a bill that would add “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as protected classes under federal civil rights law.

We don't want a little boy in school being singled out or called a "faggot" and beaten to death by the other kids for whatever reason, but the terms “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” are too subjective.
You can't go to court over whether a boy is attracted or allegedly attracted to girls or other boys. Or a girl, because if they're picking on her, she's a tomboy, and it's "he he him" all the time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

You seem to have given up even the semblance of truth. Too many falsehoods to even respond.

So you couldn't find a single 'falsehood"?


Different day, same result.

"1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled. "

Falsehood 1: Soviet Communist Party was not the predecessor of the Democrat Party
Falsehood 2: Soviet Communist Party was not the model of the Democrat Party

The Democratic Party founded: January 8, 1828
Communist Party of the Soviet Union founded: 1898 as the Bolsheviks

Different day, different lies.

"Falsehood 1: Soviet Communist Party was not the predecessor of the Democrat Party"

This is do easy because you're so dumb.

Watch this:

Check out these dozen aims of Liberals/Progressives/Democrats today...

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.(Obama: "I'll be more flexible after the election...")
2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.
3. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


4. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
5. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
6. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.


7. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
8. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."
9. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


10. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
11. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
12. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


These were the goals of the communist party, as read on the floor of Congress January 10, 1963.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals


Still doubt you've been taught to believe exactly what the CPUSA espoused???
Exactly the sort of thinking advanced by Lenin and Marx.


More?
"Communist Party USA Chairman Vows Cooperation With Democratic Party The chairman of the National Committee of the Communist Party USA has penned a 2,023-word manifesto making the critical point that American Communists are eager to work with the Democratic Party to advance the modern communist agenda and achieve communist goals.

Communist Party chairman John Bachtell published his essay last week at People’s World, a “daily news website of, for and by the 99% and the direct descendant of the Daily Worker.” Communist Party USA Work With Democrats The Daily Caller

 

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

You seem to have given up even the semblance of truth. Too many falsehoods to even respond.

So you couldn't find a single 'falsehood"?


Different day, same result.

"1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled. "

Falsehood 1: Soviet Communist Party was not the predecessor of the Democrat Party
Falsehood 2: Soviet Communist Party was not the model of the Democrat Party

The Democratic Party founded: January 8, 1828
Communist Party of the Soviet Union founded: 1898 as the Bolsheviks

Different day, different lies.

More???

"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....




....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University


President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]

 

[PoliticalChic]

a bill that would add “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as protected classes under federal civil rights law.

We don't want a little boy in school being singled out or called a "faggot" and beaten to death by the other kids for whatever reason, but the terms “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” are too subjective.
You can't go to court over whether a boy is attracted or allegedly attracted to girls or other boys. Or a girl, because if they're picking on her, she's a tomboy, and it's "he he him" all the time.

Liberalism writ large.


"CHILD ABUSE: 11-Year Old Boy In Drag Named ‘Desmond Is Amazing’ Dances At LGBTQ Nightclub While Gay Men Throw Dollar Bills At Him
nowtheendbegins.com | 2018-12-20

Perhaps sensing the horrific optics of the event, LGBT news sites have assiduously avoided reporting that their favorite 11-year-old drag kid “Desmond Is Amazing” danced on stage in a New York gay bar while adult male patrons tossed money his way as if he were a male stripper."

CHILD ABUSE: 11-Year Old Boy In Drag Named ‘Desmond Is Amazing’ Dances At LGBTQ Nightclub While Gay Men Throw Dollar Bills At Him - NewsBreak

Perhaps sensing the horrific optics of the event, LGBT news sites have assiduously avoided reporting that their favorite 11-year-old drag kid “Desmond Is Amazing” danced on stage in a New York gay bar while adult male patrons tossed money his way as if he were a male...

www.newsbreak.com

 

[Dagosa]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

So you just wasted all that time describing the GOP
Trump fed science illiterates just “ babble for the base.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

You seem to have given up even the semblance of truth. Too many falsehoods to even respond.

So you couldn't find a single 'falsehood"?


Different day, same result.

"1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled. "

Falsehood 1: Soviet Communist Party was not the predecessor of the Democrat Party
Falsehood 2: Soviet Communist Party was not the model of the Democrat Party

The Democratic Party founded: January 8, 1828
Communist Party of the Soviet Union founded: 1898 as the Bolsheviks

Different day, different lies.

I'd be remiss if I didn't also point out that the Nazis claimed the Democrat Party as its model.


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

• From the LATimes:
• “At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
  When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes
• although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..
• 
  
• ….wait for it…..
• 
  
• ….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!
• 
  

“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.



That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”

Contributor: When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

The European far right sees much to admire in the United States, with political leaders such as Marine le Pen of France and Geert Wilders of the Netherlands celebrating events — such as the recent presidential election — that seem to bode well for their brand of ethno-nationalism.

www.latimes.com

If it weren’t so tragic, it’d be funny: the Progressives/Democrat’s programs were too rigid for the Nazis.



Amazing.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What was once the party of JFK has been fully consumed and absorbed tarantula wasp-like by the Communists who infected it 2 generations ago.

In 2016, they openly embraced their Inner Mao. In 2020, they are proudly anti-American, tearing down our statues, history and culture like the American Taliban they've become.

 

[Taz]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Just because whomever hom skooled you didn't understand science enough to teach it to you doesn't mean that your random copy&paste about communism makes science invalid. Please don't try again.

Ivy league grad.

Which clown school did you say you attended?

As if, lol. They don't teach your communist crap or your anti-science nonsense in those schools. Plus, you don't say that you were in a private school in elementary or high school, and we know how much you hate public school, so you probably didn't go there. So what's left?

"They don't teach your communist crap or your anti-science nonsense in those schools. "


Amusing.


The OP related the exact opposite of your claim.

So.....that's what they taught you in clown college?

You're trying to tell us that an Ivy League school teaches that evolution is bogus? Um... no.

 

[Taz]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Just because whomever hom skooled you didn't understand science enough to teach it to you doesn't mean that your random copy&paste about communism makes science invalid. Please don't try again.

You add so little to the conversation

Yep, it appears Taz is SERIOUSLY bereft of ANY sign of intelligence. Tragic.

Sez the guy who can't stop spamming the board with "what's your favorite (insert random musician here) song?"

 

[PoliticalChic]

What was once the party of JFK has been fully consumed and absorbed tarantula wasp-like by the Communists who infected it 2 generations ago.

In 2016, they openly embraced their Inner Mao. In 2020, they are proudly anti-American, tearing down our statues, history and culture like the American Taliban they've become.

I could cry reading your post.


I just spent a few days driving through Pennsylvania.....not Philly.....but around it, and saw very few Biden lawn posters, and lots of Trump ones.

But....who knows.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When science and politics are mixed, the only thing that results is politics…and forced acquiescence.



1.Nothing is more important to Leftists than advancing their ideology. Certainly not science. While they claim to adhere to science, and that science established there rectitude, there are numerous glaring examples that prove that nothing could be further from the truth. And, in fact, this characteristic is one more ‘tie that binds’ the Democrat Party to their predecessors, the Soviet Communists after whom they are modelled.

2. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. And the Nazis attempt to do exactly the same thing: "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

"In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

Of course they were never able to keep that promise, just as their claims of proof in Darwinian science has proved an empty dream.



3. One is reminded of how Soviet biological science clung to the same erroneous Lamarckian views that Darwin used to explain his ‘random modifications’ and ‘natural selection.’ They practiced political science, Lysenkoism…..
“Can you get chocolate milk from brown cows? Believe it or not, during the cold war, Soviet scientists tried many experiments to achieve a very similar goal starting with plants. In 1927, an agronomist named Trofim Lysenko working at a remote agricultural station in Azerbaijan, ….. Lysenko’s main contribution was the idea that such a transformation could be inherited to the following generations without any treatment.

By 1938 he had been named president of the Academy of Agricultural Science where he used his influence to enforce adherence to his ideas. … Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades. Several books have documented Lysenko’s rise to leadership, the interrelationship of his political leanings and scientific beliefs. The resultant purge of ideas and the scientists who advocated them serves as a lesson against political ideology influencing the scientific method.”
Lamarck, Lysenko, and Modern Day Epigenetics - Mind the Science Gap

"Lysekno’s ideas reached the ear of Soviet leaders and would become doctrine for decades."
Exactly the same ‘political science’ is practiced in the US as Darwinian evolution or global warming.

What do you suppose happened to and scientist who disagreed?




4. Ideology over science: the hallmark of the Left. Like this:

The best recent example… Facebook offers 56 options for your gender. You can use up to 10 of them on your profile. Fifty-six sounds like a lot, but actually a lot of them are variations on a theme — "cisgender man" and "cisgender male," as well as "cis man" and "cis male." In terms of broad categories, there about a dozen.
See Confused by All the New Facebook Genders? Here's What They Mean.



Quite an advantage for the Left, in owning the schools and the media, and being able to use government to 'pay off' those who advance their 'science.'

Just because whomever hom skooled you didn't understand science enough to teach it to you doesn't mean that your random copy&paste about communism makes science invalid. Please don't try again.

Ivy league grad.

Which clown school did you say you attended?

As if, lol. They don't teach your communist crap or your anti-science nonsense in those schools. Plus, you don't say that you were in a private school in elementary or high school, and we know how much you hate public school, so you probably didn't go there. So what's left?

"They don't teach your communist crap or your anti-science nonsense in those schools. "


Amusing.


The OP related the exact opposite of your claim.

So.....that's what they taught you in clown college?

You're trying to tell us that an Ivy League school teaches that evolution is bogus? Um... no.

"You're trying to tell us....."

"Us"????


You have a tapeworm????



Get well soon.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them." -George Orwell



And speaking of stupid ideas….
7. “Transgenderism: A Mental Illness Is Not a Civil Right

…transgender ideology holds that people can be born into the wrong body: It's simply not true. We can demonstrate this by looking at twin studies. No one is born in the wrong body.

…prior to transgender ideology, these children were treated with watchful waiting, because for many kids it may be a passing phase. Sometimes the girls may just be tomboys. So with either watchful waiting or family and individual therapy the vast majority, 75-95% of kids, would accept their biological sex by young adulthood.


The definition of a delusion is a fixed false belief. So if I persistently and consistently insist that I am Margaret Thatcher, or persistently consistently insist that I am a cat, or that I am an amputee trapped in a normal body -- I am delusional.

In fact, there are people who believe they're amputees trapped in a normal body and they are appropriately diagnosed as having Body Identity Integrity Disorder, a mouthful, but you get my drift. So if you want to cut off an arm or a leg you're mentally ill, but if you want to cut off healthy breasts and genitals then you are transgender and you don't have a mental illness. That's completely unscientific.”
Dr. Michelle Cretella on Transgenderism: A Mental Illness Is Not a Civil Right

 

[Taz]

"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them." -George Orwell



And speaking of stupid ideas….
7. “Transgenderism: A Mental Illness Is Not a Civil Right

…transgender ideology holds that people can be born into the wrong body: It's simply not true. We can demonstrate this by looking at twin studies. No one is born in the wrong body.

…prior to transgender ideology, these children were treated with watchful waiting, because for many kids it may be a passing phase. Sometimes the girls may just be tomboys. So with either watchful waiting or family and individual therapy the vast majority, 75-95% of kids, would accept their biological sex by young adulthood.


The definition of a delusion is a fixed false belief. So if I persistently and consistently insist that I am Margaret Thatcher, or persistently consistently insist that I am a cat, or that I am an amputee trapped in a normal body -- I am delusional.

In fact, there are people who believe they're amputees trapped in a normal body and they are appropriately diagnosed as having Body Identity Integrity Disorder, a mouthful, but you get my drift. So if you want to cut off an arm or a leg you're mentally ill, but if you want to cut off healthy breasts and genitals then you are transgender and you don't have a mental illness. That's completely unscientific.”
Dr. Michelle Cretella on Transgenderism: A Mental Illness Is Not a Civil Right

People like you have a mental illness that manifests itself when you think of anyone who isn’t a hetero person. Get well soon.