When Resolve Wanes

Adam's Apple

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
4,092
Reaction score
448
Points
48
Should be read by every American and NEVER forgotten.

When Resolve Wanes
By Linda Chavez, The Washington Times
August 18, 2006

We are just weeks away from the 5th anniversary of the September 11, 2001attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Yet we have quickly forgotten the lessons of that terrible day. We understood then that a group of Islamic fanatics had declared war on the United States and that our only option was to defeat them.

Barely five years later, we seem to have lost our resolve. But our enemies haven't lost theirs, as the interrupted plot to blow up U.S.-bound airplanes in Great Britain shows all too well. So what are the chances we will ultimately prevail?

First, it's important we understand who the enemy is and why he has targeted us. We are not fighting a war on terror, despite the nearly universal shorthand most of us have adopted. The terrorists who flew airplanes into American buildings, blew up hotels and nightclubs killing Western tourists in Bali and Kenya, bombed trains in Spain and England, and sent missiles and suicide bombers into Israel are fighting a religious war.

In their view, we are infidels who must be converted or killed. There is no room in their ideology for peaceful co-existence or detente. They are willing to sacrifice their lives -- and, most importantly, their children's lives -- to kill as many of us as possible.

We have never faced an enemy like this before. Even the Soviet Union at its most ruthless was not as pernicious a threat. The Soviets wanted territory and power, but they always acted rationally. Mutual Assured Destruction worked as an effective nuclear deterrent because the Soviets would never have sacrificed their own lives just to kill us. Imagine how differently the Cold War would have turned out if the Soviets were willing to sacrifice Moscow in order to obliterate New York.

But we know the Islamists are perfectly willing to pile up body after body of fellow Muslims so long as they can maximize the deaths of Christians and Jews. The difference is the Soviets wanted their reward here on Earth, while Islamic extremists don't expect theirs until after death.

In the face of this deadly purpose, we in the West seem totally ill equipped for battle. Rather than single-mindedly tracking down those who want to kill us, we worry we might infringe on their civil liberties. When we do take action, as Israel did in attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon, we become paralyzed with remorse when innocent bystanders die, as they do in every war.

Yet our enemies think nothing of strapping explosives onto the chests of their own women and children in order to kill us. How many times have we heard the mothers of suicide bombers praise their children's martyrdom and boast of those they sent to the grave, while we shed tears at the loss of innocent life?

This is an asymmetrical war not because we have more sophisticated weapons and they have only crude methods with which to fight, but because the moral constraints are so lopsided. Can you envision Hezbollah expressing regret and sorrow if one of their rockets had hit an Israeli target, killing two dozen women and children, as Israel did when its bombs killed 28 (not the 54 originally reported) in Qana, Lebanon? We cannot, and should not, adopt their perverted morality, but we should recognize the imbalance for what it is.

Unless we learn to see our enemies for who they are, we cannot hope to win this war. We must stop treating our own government as the enemy. We have to quit worrying whether the rest of the world will love us when we act to protect ourselves. We have to give up the illusion that if we just retreat from the world or abandon Israel the Islamist fanatics will leave us alone.

We must recognize that it took most of a century to defeat communism and it may take much longer to vanquish Islamofascism. Our best hope for victory may well be that radical Islam, like the Soviet Union, will begin to collapse from within.

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060817-091451-8363r.htm
 

Annie

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Messages
50,848
Reaction score
4,826
Points
1,790
Should be read by every American and NEVER forgotten.

When Resolve Wanes
By Linda Chavez, The Washington Times
August 18, 2006

We are just weeks away from the 5th anniversary of the September 11, 2001attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Yet we have quickly forgotten the lessons of that terrible day. We understood then that a group of Islamic fanatics had declared war on the United States and that our only option was to defeat them.
I didn't forget, I bet a whole bunch of o†her citizens and Westerners didn't forget either.
Barely five years later, we seem to have lost our resolve. But our enemies haven't lost theirs, as the interrupted plot to blow up U.S.-bound airplanes in Great Britain shows all too well. So what are the chances we will ultimately prevail?

First, it's important we understand who the enemy is and why he has targeted us. We are not fighting a war on terror, despite the nearly universal shorthand most of us have adopted. The terrorists who flew airplanes into American buildings, blew up hotels and nightclubs killing Western tourists in Bali and Kenya, bombed trains in Spain and England, and sent missiles and suicide bombers into Israel are fighting a religious war.

In their view, we are infidels who must be converted or killed. There is no room in their ideology for peaceful co-existence or detente. They are willing to sacrifice their lives -- and, most importantly, their children's lives -- to kill as many of us as possible.
Bingo. It's religion or lack of that makes them attack. If the annhililate Islamic believers, they haven't a problem with that.
We have never faced an enemy like this before. Even the Soviet Union at its most ruthless was not as pernicious a threat. The Soviets wanted territory and power, but they always acted rationally. Mutual Assured Destruction worked as an effective nuclear deterrent because the Soviets would never have sacrificed their own lives just to kill us. Imagine how differently the Cold War would have turned out if the Soviets were willing to sacrifice Moscow in order to obliterate New York.

But we know the Islamists are perfectly willing to pile up body after body of fellow Muslims so long as they can maximize the deaths of Christians and Jews. The difference is the Soviets wanted their reward here on Earth, while Islamic extremists don't expect theirs until after death.
Actually this isn't all that different than what Chamberlain agreed to, and was spiked for. [/quote]

In the face of this deadly purpose, we in the West seem totally ill equipped for battle. Rather than single-mindedly tracking down those who want to kill us, we worry we might infringe on their civil liberties. When we do take action, as Israel did in attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon, we become paralyzed with remorse when innocent bystanders die, as they do in every war.

Yet our enemies think nothing of strapping explosives onto the chests of their own women and children in order to kill us. How many times have we heard the mothers of suicide bombers praise their children's martyrdom and boast of those they sent to the grave, while we shed tears at the loss of innocent life?

This is an asymmetrical war not because we have more sophisticated weapons and they have only crude methods with which to fight, but because the moral constraints are so lopsided. Can you envision Hezbollah expressing regret and sorrow if one of their rockets had hit an Israeli target, killing two dozen women and children, as Israel did when its bombs killed 28 (not the 54 originally reported) in Qana, Lebanon? We cannot, and should not, adopt their perverted morality, but we should recognize the imbalance for what it is.

Unless we learn to see our enemies for who they are, we cannot hope to win this war. We must stop treating our own government as the enemy. We have to quit worrying whether the rest of the world will love us when we act to protect ourselves. We have to give up the illusion that if we just retreat from the world or abandon Israel the Islamist fanatics will leave us alone.

We must recognize that it took most of a century to defeat communism and it may take much longer to vanquish Islamofascism. Our best hope for victory may well be that radical Islam, like the Soviet Union, will begin to collapse from within.

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060817-091451-8363r.htm[/QUOTE]

Bottom line, only the West can defeat the West. The US and Uk, AU are looking for freedom. Many of the rest are looking for Dhimmitude. Some seem willing to convert to Sharia.
 

Bullypulpit

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
5,849
Reaction score
382
Points
48
Location
Columbus, OH
Yes, when Chimpy McPresident said of Osama bin Laden...

<blockquote>I don't know where he is. I -- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. - White House Press Conference, 03/13/2002</blockquote>

America's resolve to win the so-called "war on terror" was lost.

When American troops were committed to an illegal war of agression against a soveriegn power, rather than securing Afghanistan against a resurgence by America's real enemies, by this same president, America's resolve was lost.

When Chimpy squadered the good will of the rest of the world towards America after 9/11 through his wreckless, feckless policies, America's resolve was lost.

When, five years after that tragic day, our borders, ports, nuclear facilities and petro/chem facilities are no more secure than they were on 9/10/01, America's resolve was lost.

Ms. Chavez has it wrong. Americans now understand the war in Iraq for the folly that is was, is, and shall always be. American's now understand that this president, his administration and the GOP have done nothing but use the threat of another terrorist attack, and the fear it engenders as a bludgeon, to secure their grasp on power.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top