When Presidents Were Real Men

Imagine a President today standing on the edge of a 3,000 ft cliff with no guard rail. Or getting shot in the chest while giving a speech then finishing the speech. Ike, JFK, Reagan, Bush's all fit the bill too.

View attachment 86297

Yeah, fuck Hillary, she's not a real man.
Taking heavy enemy fire while coming into a hot LZ, Hillary is the men of men.

Well lets not forget- Trump and his own personal Vietnam- of having casual sex and avoiding getting STD's......
 
I think all the presidents have been glamorized. Though, a few were truly great men at least in some respects.
No matter how hard the media tried to make him a man, the effort turned futile.
View attachment 86329 View attachment 86330 View attachment 86331

So you don't think a 'real man' puts up a curtain rod?

image-jpeg.86330


A real man supports his family- and is faithful to his wife.
Teddy Roosevelt and Barack Obama both fit that bill.

JFK, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump don't fit that bill.
 
I think all the presidents have been glamorized. Though, a few were truly great men at least in some respects.
No matter how hard the media tried to make him a man, the effort turned futile.
View attachment 86329 View attachment 86330 View attachment 86331

So you don't think a 'real man' puts up a curtain rod?

image-jpeg.86330


A real man supports his family- and is faithful to his wife.
Teddy Roosevelt and Barack Obama both fit that bill.

JFK, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump don't fit that bill.
image.jpeg
 
I think all the presidents have been glamorized. Though, a few were truly great men at least in some respects.
No matter how hard the media tried to make him a man, the effort turned futile.
View attachment 86329 View attachment 86330 View attachment 86331

So you don't think a 'real man' puts up a curtain rod?

image-jpeg.86330


A real man supports his family- and is faithful to his wife.
Teddy Roosevelt and Barack Obama both fit that bill.

JFK, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump don't fit that bill.





So, you agree that fdr doesn't either?
 
I think all the presidents have been glamorized. Though, a few were truly great men at least in some respects.
No matter how hard the media tried to make him a man, the effort turned futile.
View attachment 86329 View attachment 86330 View attachment 86331

So you don't think a 'real man' puts up a curtain rod?

image-jpeg.86330


A real man supports his family- and is faithful to his wife.
Teddy Roosevelt and Barack Obama both fit that bill.

JFK, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump don't fit that bill.





So, you agree that fdr doesn't either?

Well FDR certainly wasn't up there hanging curtain rods.

Yes- I would agree that FDR, JFK, Clinton and Trump all fit that bill.

Real men don't cheat on their wives.

Now that doesn't mean that they couldn't be good Presidents. But real men don't cheat on their wives, take care of their families- and yes- even hang curtains.
 
I think all the presidents have been glamorized. Though, a few were truly great men at least in some respects.
No matter how hard the media tried to make him a man, the effort turned futile.
View attachment 86329 View attachment 86330 View attachment 86331

So you don't think a 'real man' puts up a curtain rod?

image-jpeg.86330


A real man supports his family- and is faithful to his wife.
Teddy Roosevelt and Barack Obama both fit that bill.

JFK, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump don't fit that bill.





So, you agree that fdr doesn't either?

Well FDR certainly wasn't up there hanging curtain rods.

Yes- I would agree that FDR, JFK, Clinton and Trump all fit that bill.

Real men don't cheat on their wives.

Now that doesn't mean that they couldn't be good Presidents. But real men don't cheat on their wives, take care of their families- and yes- even hang curtains.



fdr cheated on his wife constantly.
 
I think all the presidents have been glamorized. Though, a few were truly great men at least in some respects.
No matter how hard the media tried to make him a man, the effort turned futile.
View attachment 86329 View attachment 86330 View attachment 86331

So you don't think a 'real man' puts up a curtain rod?

image-jpeg.86330


A real man supports his family- and is faithful to his wife.
Teddy Roosevelt and Barack Obama both fit that bill.

JFK, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump don't fit that bill.





So, you agree that fdr doesn't either?

Well FDR certainly wasn't up there hanging curtain rods.

Yes- I would agree that FDR, JFK, Clinton and Trump all fit that bill.

Real men don't cheat on their wives.

Now that doesn't mean that they couldn't be good Presidents. But real men don't cheat on their wives, take care of their families- and yes- even hang curtains.



fdr cheated on his wife constantly.

Hyperbole- FDR did cheat on his wife. Repeatedly- but not constantly.
JFK also cheated on his wife repeatedly- as did Clinton. Eisenhower cheated on his wife- but not while President. Trump cheated on his wives- though how often I don't know

Like I said- I don't consider anyone who cheats on his wife(therefore also their kids) to be a 'real man'

But they can be good Presidents.

Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter were both faithful to their wives.
 
If one were serious he or she could probably find some sort of scandal in the white house for every president. In fact there is a book or books with that theme already in print.
 
That guy who got shot in the chest and continued giving the speech, wound up running the table with primary victories. Won most of them easily. Dude from New York whose critics called him an 'egomaniac'.

He took those primary votes into the convention expecting to win but the establishment snubbed him and nominated the conservative guy from Ohio.

Shot-in-the-chest guy went down the street, started his own party and ran anyway. Came in second, pushing the Republican to third and siphoning off enough votes that Woodrow Wlson won the White House with less than 42% of the popular vote.

Oh yeah the election also featured a popular Socialist and a guy with big hair.

True story.
but who was the guy who got shot in the chest?

Teddy Roosevelt.

The year was 1912.
I thought he WAS president.

He was, prior to that. He left office in 1909 to what he thought was his successor, Taft. But Taft went too conservative for his tastes, so TR challenged him for the nomination in '12 -- which is when he was shot (and, it's true, continued his speech).

LaFollette actually won the first couple of primaries before TR overtook him and then went on to sweep almost all the rest. Taft, the incumbent, won one state, barely. But the Party ignored the primary results as that was the time it wanted to establish a path to the right, which Taft would deliver and Roosevelt would not. So they both ran in the general election, and Wilson was left to benefit from it.

We have a strange electoral system -- the more candidates who run, the easier it is for any one of them to win with a minority of the vote.

That guy who got shot in the chest and continued giving the speech, wound up running the table with primary victories. Won most of them easily. Dude from New York whose critics called him an 'egomaniac'.

He took those primary votes into the convention expecting to win but the establishment snubbed him and nominated the conservative guy from Ohio.

Shot-in-the-chest guy went down the street, started his own party and ran anyway. Came in second, pushing the Republican to third and siphoning off enough votes that Woodrow Wlson won the White House with less than 42% of the popular vote.

Oh yeah the election also featured a popular Socialist and a guy with big hair.

True story.
but who was the guy who got shot in the chest?

Teddy Roosevelt.

The year was 1912.
I thought he WAS president.

He was, prior to that. He left office in 1909 to what he thought was his successor, Taft. But Taft went too conservative for his tastes, so TR challenged him for the nomination in '12 -- which is when he was shot (and, it's true, continued his speech).

LaFollette actually won the first couple of primaries before TR overtook him and then went on to sweep almost all the rest. Taft, the incumbent, won one state, barely. But the Party ignored the primary results as that was the time it wanted to establish a path to the right, which Taft would deliver and Roosevelt would not. So they both ran in the general election, and Wilson was left to benefit from it.

We have a strange electoral system -- the more candidates who run, the easier it is for any one of them to win with a minority of the vote.


Wrong, Teddy Roosevelt was financed by the banking oligarchs to run against Taft in order to pull votes away from so Wilson (the choice of the bankers) could win because he agreed in advance to sign over the control of the nation's money supply to them. The Bull Moose Party was financed by the big banks and it accomplished it's goal. Taft was against a central bank just like most of our founding fathers.


Shows who's pushing the votes.
 
Teddy Roosevelt.

The year was 1912.
I thought he WAS president.

He was, prior to that. He left office in 1909 to what he thought was his successor, Taft. But Taft went too conservative for his tastes, so TR challenged him for the nomination in '12 -- which is when he was shot (and, it's true, continued his speech).

LaFollette actually won the first couple of primaries before TR overtook him and then went on to sweep almost all the rest. Taft, the incumbent, won one state, barely. But the Party ignored the primary results as that was the time it wanted to establish a path to the right, which Taft would deliver and Roosevelt would not. So they both ran in the general election, and Wilson was left to benefit from it.

We have a strange electoral system -- the more candidates who run, the easier it is for any one of them to win with a minority of the vote.

Teddy Roosevelt.

The year was 1912.
I thought he WAS president.

He was, prior to that. He left office in 1909 to what he thought was his successor, Taft. But Taft went too conservative for his tastes, so TR challenged him for the nomination in '12 -- which is when he was shot (and, it's true, continued his speech).

LaFollette actually won the first couple of primaries before TR overtook him and then went on to sweep almost all the rest. Taft, the incumbent, won one state, barely. But the Party ignored the primary results as that was the time it wanted to establish a path to the right, which Taft would deliver and Roosevelt would not. So they both ran in the general election, and Wilson was left to benefit from it.

We have a strange electoral system -- the more candidates who run, the easier it is for any one of them to win with a minority of the vote.


Wrong, Teddy Roosevelt was financed by the banking oligarchs to run against Taft in order to pull votes away from so Wilson (the choice of the bankers) could win because he agreed in advance to sign over the control of the nation's money supply to them. The Bull Moose Party was financed by the big banks and it accomplished it's goal. Taft was against a central bank just like most of our founding fathers.

I'm sure if a limb falls off a fucking tree you think it's a conspiracy by the Illuminati combined with played-backwards messages on Beatles records too. :rolleyes:


I'm sure that I know more than you and it seems to irk you for some reason. I'm not trying to "one -up" anyone. I am simply trying to get people to wake up...nothing more or less. Read the book "Creature From Jekyll Island"...you can get it for free by downloading it on -line. That's not my only source but it's a very detailed account of the unconstitutional passing of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.


mental illness, paranoia and ideas of references... been there....
 
I know that life is not all about $$$, but why is it that since Mr. Obama became president that the debt of the Nation rose in more Trillions during his terms than in any other president's terms? And with all those $$$ spent, what substantial things are being shown for the purchases those monies bought? So maybe some may have foggy eyes to him because of all of the debt debt debt that people have to keep shouldering as if their own private debts are not heavy enough.
 

Forum List

Back
Top