When Our Government Allowed to Raid an Attorney’s Office

[Camp]

If ordered to fire on US citizens, I think most of the military would mutiny.
Washington and the Pentagon have VERY low credibility these days.

Also, the fact that most service men and women come from Texas and Alabama is a modest indicator on how it would likely go.

Nonsense. Texas comes in second, but Alabama is way down on the list.

 

[jc456]

"suspected" crime. And yeah that had to be disclosed in the application for a warrant. I don't know about the FBI, but warrants don't always tell the searchee what the suspected crime is. But it should be obvious. In this case they were after any records dealing with payoffs Cohen made to people accusing Trump of behaving badly

It could go much deeper than that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

 

[Siete]

Yes, the identified the crime to the judge that signed the warrant.

Provide the list and detail how each was illegal, otherwise it is not so...according to your logic


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

"suspected" crime. And yeah that had to be disclosed in the application for a warrant. I don't know about the FBI, but warrants don't always tell the searchee what the suspected crime is. But it should be obvious. In this case they were after any records dealing with payoffs Cohen made to people accusing Trump of behaving badly

It could go much deeper than that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

prove there wasnt a crime ... i'll wait

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Clearly, you're excited at the possibility of having an opportunity to kill your fellow Americans. Only a truy damaged mind would think of doing so over Trump. That's actually way dumber and more morally questionable than fighting to preserve slavery.

Me? No! You're think of Jake and Nat. I don't believe a large scale war is even necessary.

You're right about one thing. It would never be a large scale war. As soon as a few dozen of you dopes assembled, you'd be droned to bits.

You're as sick as your goose stepping friend Jake. Droned to bits, you mean by the FBI Gestapo?

By our military, fool. Who do you imagine you'd be fighting in your civil war?

Like I said, you're a sick ****

Tell us some more about your civil war, fool.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

By our military, fool. Who do you imagine you'd be fighting in your civil war?

Not to get into a bunch of zombie apocalypse hypotheticals and whatnot, but you seem to assume the military would be on your side. That is a bold assumption.

Not really bold at all. Realistic. No one's supporting a war for Trump.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It could go much deeper than that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Clearly, you're excited at the possibility of having an opportunity to kill your fellow Americans. Only a truy damaged mind would think of doing so over Trump. That's actually way dumber and more morally questionable than fighting to preserve slavery.

Me? No! You're think of Jake and Nat. I don't believe a large scale war is even necessary.

You're right about one thing. It would never be a large scale war. As soon as a few dozen of you dopes assembled, you'd be droned to bits.

You're as sick as your goose stepping friend Jake. Droned to bits, you mean by the FBI Gestapo?

By our military, fool. Who do you imagine you'd be fighting in your civil war?

If ordered to fire on US citizens, I think most of the military would mutiny.
Washington and the Pentagon have VERY low credibility these days.

Yep, that's what happened the last time.

 

[jc456]

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

yep that is exactly what I am saying. You win for once in your life.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

yep that is exactly what I am saying. You win for once in your life.

Prove it, dope.

 

[jc456]

"suspected" crime. And yeah that had to be disclosed in the application for a warrant. I don't know about the FBI, but warrants don't always tell the searchee what the suspected crime is. But it should be obvious. In this case they were after any records dealing with payoffs Cohen made to people accusing Trump of behaving badly

It could go much deeper than that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

prove there wasnt a crime ... i'll wait

you can't provide one. there.

 

[jc456]

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

yep that is exactly what I am saying. You win for once in your life.

Prove it, dope.

prove what? let me see the request. I'm good let's see it. Why do they need to keep it secret?

 

[Siete]

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

you dont honestly think that idiot knows what it takes to get a warrant do you ?

 

[jc456]

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

you dont honestly think that idiot knows what it takes to get a warrant do you ?

you don't that's for sure. you can't name the crime.

 

[J.E.D]

due process is the law. and I'm still waiting for the crime.

Unless you’re Cohen’s lawyer, you’re on the investigative team, you’re in the states attorneys office that brought the evidence to a judge, or you’re the judge who signed the warrant, you’re not privy to that information.

Dumb ass

 

[jc456]

due process is the law. and I'm still waiting for the crime.

Unless you’re Cohen’s lawyer, you’re on the investigative team, you’re in the states attorneys office that brought the evidence to a judge, or you’re the judge who signed the warrant, you’re not privy to that information.

Dumb ass

why, what's the secret?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It could go much deeper than that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

I know that a judge would be disbarred for issuing a warrant without being given probable cause.

I know that it is not a requirement for the Govt to make a public announcement of what the crime on the warrant is.

So I am stuck choosing to believe the judge followed the rule of law or I can agree with a Trump zealot that would defend Trump if he took the original copy of the Declaration of Independence and used it to wipe his ass after a day of eating McDonalds

I will go with the former till actual evidence shows otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[J.E.D]

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

you dont honestly think that idiot knows what it takes to get a warrant do you ?

you don't that's for sure. you can't name the crime.

So, because some anonymous person on the internet can’t “name the crime”, then the raid is unconstitutional?

 

[jc456]

again, with throw the attorney client in the water with you. state the crime or stfu.

I do not have to state the crime. I am not the investigator


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

so you know of no crime. so until that is established, then a warrant is not to be signed.

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

I know that a judge would be disbarred for issuing a warrant without being given probable cause.

I know that it is not a requirement for the Govt to make a public announcement of what the crime on the warrant is.

So I am stuck choosing to believe the judge followed the rule of law or I can agree with a Trump zealot that would defend Trump if he took the original copy of the Declaration of Independence and used it to wipe his ass after a day of eating McDonalds

I will go with the former till actual evidence shows otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

yeah and the DOJ is supposed to turn over all documents to congress when they ask for them. and yet, that isn't happening. I trust no one there sorry just that they are proving the deep state with this lack of compliance to the congress request. so I do not trust that a crime was used for the warrant. i have history on my side. the Dossier.

 

[jc456]

Wait, so you think because you and I were not given a copy of the warrant and told the crime that the warrant does not list one?

Do you hold that same view for the thousands of warrants issued every day all around the country? That with each of them you should personally be informed of the crime?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

you know, I hate when people like you that got nothing think you got the entire workbook. You have no idea of anything here, and you just admitted it. so you don't know that they provided a crime. Do you?

They had to to get a warrant, dope.

You're asserting a conspiracy wherin the judge signed off without just cause.
Prove that.

you dont honestly think that idiot knows what it takes to get a warrant do you ?

you don't that's for sure. you can't name the crime.

So, because some anonymous person on the internet can’t “name the crime”, then the raid is unconstitutional?

no because the FBI hasn't told us what the crime was is what makes it unconstitutional. thanks for asking me though.

 

[g5000]

I find it confounding that a dipshit thinks an attorney's office being searched is dangerous when in fact it is criminal lawyers who are a much, much greater hazard to our way of life.