When Is Impeaching A President Warranted?

[Papageorgio]

If impeachment were warranted for blow jobs Kennedy wouldn't have made it past his first month.

Lying about it to Congress....now that counted. I am surprised you hadn't heard about that but being in kindergarten at the time the details might have made sense to you.

It seem like using public office to arm-twist another nation to fire a prosecutor to save the ass of one's felonious offspring might be a good starting point for a genuine impeachment.

Didn't Trump lie to Congress?

Did he testify before Congress?

 

[Rigby5]

It seem like using public office to arm-twist another nation to fire a prosecutor to save the ass of one's felonious offspring might be a good starting point for a genuine impeachment.

It would be if that were what had happened. First off, Hunter Biden is not and has never been a felon, nor has he been accused of any crimes by ANYONE other than Donald Trump.

Secondly, the prosecutor wasn't fired because of Hunter Biden, he was fired at the request of NATO, the IMF, the EU and the Obama Administration, and the US Senate - Mitch McConnell being the majority leader. Biden was the messenger, not the instigator.

So if you're suggesting that Biden be impeached for these "crimes", think again.

Not at all true.
Hunter Biden clearly was being the bag man for illegal kickbacks of US aid to the Ukraine.
Russia already proved it, and Shokin was going to prosecute until Joe Biden illegal forced is termination.

NATO, IMF, EU, Obama, etc., do NOT have any authority or standing to ask for the termination of a foreign inspector general, and it was clear the Ukraine has already been found guilty of stealing oil and gas from Russia at the International Court in the Hague, so Russia has been proven to be in the right.

If Hunter Biden was not a felon, then why was he paid millions to do nothing, with no experience, and not once even going to the Ukraine?

 

[Papageorgio]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

One of the things that I heard at the time of the Clinton Impeachment was that Republicans were pissed that Nixon was driven from office. Angry, humiliated, and wanting revenge for Nixon, and for Iran-Contra which they saw as a Democratic attempt to tarnish St. Ronnie, they were determined to take down a Democratic President.

Added to which Clinton's numbers were so much better than Reagan's - better job creation, lower unemployment, even with higher taxes, and he raised the minimum wage, balanced the budget. Clinton was an incredibly popular President and it made Republicans crazy. They told lies about the Clintons. Robert Mercer had a smear book written and Republicans started investigating.

It started as an investigation of Whitewater, and Hillary's beef futures, but eventually took up every rumour the Republicans could dig up (Anita Broaddrick), or invent (Vince Foster's death). Six and a half years and $100,000,000 later, all they had was a lie about a blow job. Republicans had also spent about $400,000 in legal fees for Paula Jones case at the same time, in addition to her new wardrobe. Starr charged some Clinton clients and business associates in Whitewater but there was no evidence the Clintons were involved.

I wasn't really following politics at the time, but I thought the actions of the Republican Party were the most egriously political witchhunt I have ever seen, and completely unprincipled.

The Arkansas state bar thought it was serious enough to disbar him. He lied under oath, he obstructed justice and trampled over Paula Jones civil rights. During his testimony instead of lying his response should have been, its not any of your business.

 

[Dragonlady]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

You mean where a president takes trips to pedophile ilsand on the Loilita Express and then comes back and sexually harasses a young intern on the presidential desk? Gee wouldn't that get most CEOs fired?

Actually it wouldn't even get him admonished. The President didn't not go to Epstein's Island while in office. Not once. And Monica was a legal adult, in a consensual relationship with Bill Clinton, who she knew was married. He didn't "sexually harass" her or anyone else.

CEO's never get fired for sexually harassing interns. The girl is removed and paid off if she becomes a "problem". You don't live in the real world if you think otherwise.

Monica wasn't sexually harassed. She was a political groupie, who told friends she was "packing up her kneepads and going to Washington" after she graduated. She revelled in her part as "Presidential Mistress", right up until Republicans outed the relationship in the media, and turned her into a national laughingstock, forcing her to testfy against Bill Clinton.

So don't pretend that Bill Clinton was a predator here, or that the Republicans didn't abuse this girl and treat her far worse than Bill Clinton ever did. Monica nearly committed suicide over what Ken Starr did to her.

 

[Dragonlady]

It seem like using public office to arm-twist another nation to fire a prosecutor to save the ass of one's felonious offspring might be a good starting point for a genuine impeachment.

It would be if that were what had happened. First off, Hunter Biden is not and has never been a felon, nor has he been accused of any crimes by ANYONE other than Donald Trump.

Secondly, the prosecutor wasn't fired because of Hunter Biden, he was fired at the request of NATO, the IMF, the EU and the Obama Administration, and the US Senate - Mitch McConnell being the majority leader. Biden was the messenger, not the instigator.

So if you're suggesting that Biden be impeached for these "crimes", think again.

Not at all true.
Hunter Biden clearly was being the bag man for illegal kickbacks of US aid to the Ukraine.
Russia already proved it, and Shokin was going to prosecute until Joe Biden illegal forced is termination.

NATO, IMF, EU, Obama, etc., do NOT have any authority or standing to ask for the termination of a foreign inspector general, and it was clear the Ukraine has already been found guilty of stealing oil and gas from Russia at the International Court in the Hague, so Russia has been proven to be in the right.

If Hunter Biden was not a felon, then why was he paid millions to do nothing, with no experience, and not once even going to the Ukraine?

Yeah right. Another Russian liar is outed.

 

[Mindful]

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath...it's called perjury. Not for a blow job.

And look how they ignored that fact. Twisting the narrative.

 

[BertramN]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

One of the things that I heard at the time of the Clinton Impeachment was that Republicans were pissed that Nixon was driven from office. Angry, humiliated, and wanting revenge for Nixon, and for Iran-Contra which they saw as a Democratic attempt to tarnish St. Ronnie, they were determined to take down a Democratic President.

Added to which Clinton's numbers were so much better than Reagan's - better job creation, lower unemployment, even with higher taxes, and he raised the minimum wage, balanced the budget. Clinton was an incredibly popular President and it made Republicans crazy. They told lies about the Clintons. Robert Mercer had a smear book written and Republicans started investigating.

It started as an investigation of Whitewater, and Hillary's beef futures, but eventually took up every rumour the Republicans could dig up (Anita Broaddrick), or invent (Vince Foster's death). Six and a half years and $100,000,000 later, all they had was a lie about a blow job. Republicans had also spent about $400,000 in legal fees for Paula Jones case at the same time, in addition to her new wardrobe. Starr charged some Clinton clients and business associates in Whitewater but there was no evidence the Clintons were involved.

I wasn't really following politics at the time, but I thought the actions of the Republican Party were the most egriously political witchhunt I have ever seen, and completely unprincipled.

But, regardless of the expense to taxpayers, lack of evidence, and the time wasted, the Republicans "got him". (Perjury to Congress about a consensual blow job is a heinous crime to the RWNJs.)

Dubya lying to Congress to start two needless wars, that's totally acceptable to the RWNJs. (They'll justify their acceptance by telling everyone, Dubya wasn't testifying under oath, so it was OK for him to lie.)

The twice impeached president trump lying to everyone about everything, that makes the congressional Republicans and the RWNJs willing to destroy the United States' democracy and install the cheeto-in-chief as their führer .

.

 

[MadDog]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

How can I have a real discussion with a lying piece of shit?

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath...it's called perjury. Not for a blow job.

But back to the original question...Impeachment is warranted when a president abuses his power to force pervert men wearing dresses into the little girls bathrooms! Or arms terrorists...or gives billions to the largest state sponser of terrorism...

It depends on what your definition of the word “is” is.

 

[Aletheia4u]

These politicians are trying their best to remove Pres. Trump from power in his last seven days. That it shows that they are very nervous about something. Extremely nervous. And they are going after anyone that believes in this Q phenomenon. But this Q supposedly be a fictitious characters. But Santa is fictitious?
And Like I've been saying, Pres. Trump knew that the Bush's and the rest of these career politicians are very corrupted. That you can judge them by what they've produced, that it shows who they are. But he had elected them to his administration.
Like Kim Clement prophesied about. That these people will die by their own sword. That he prophesied that they will be the paradigm of Haman. That he created the gallows to execute God's people, like the Deep state created certain programs like the Patriot act and cancellation of the Smith/ Mundt act and other things like Fema camps and Gitmo to punish God's people with. That I believe that Pres. Trump is using their own creation to bring down the Deep state.
And Pres. Trump dated a Black woman in the past, that she said that he doesn't like a lot of people. That it shows that he have been dealing with the public on a personal basis. He didn't lived a sheltered life. That he dealt with the public face to face. But not having his employees to handle the matters.
Even Al Sharpton stated that he dealt with many backstabbers in the financial area. And so that makes him aware of deceitfulness.
And he knows how to put on a show since he was one of the characters of the WWE. And so he knows how to play along with things. He has a great poker face.
And so I believe that Steve is not lying about him and others from all 17 intelligence agencies is apart of a counter coup to take down the Deep state.
And the 17th letter in the alphabet is Q. And Q sounds like coup.

Is This Dr. Steve Pieczenik's Last Appearance on Infowars?

Dr. Steve Pieczenik triples down on his confidence in exposing the fraudulent Presidential Election of 2020 and bets Alex Jones that if he is right he wants to join the Infowars roster.

cantcensortruth.com

 

[Lesh]

It seem like using public office to arm-twist another nation to fire a prosecutor to save the ass of one's felonious offspring might be a good starting point for a genuine impeachment.

It would be if that were what had happened. First off, Hunter Biden is not and has never been a felon, nor has he been accused of any crimes by ANYONE other than Donald Trump.

Secondly, the prosecutor wasn't fired because of Hunter Biden, he was fired at the request of NATO, the IMF, the EU and the Obama Administration, and the US Senate - Mitch McConnell being the majority leader. Biden was the messenger, not the instigator.

So if you're suggesting that Biden be impeached for these "crimes", think again.

Not at all true.
Hunter Biden clearly was being the bag man for illegal kickbacks of US aid to the Ukraine.
Russia already proved it, and Shokin was going to prosecute until Joe Biden illegal forced is termination.

NATO, IMF, EU, Obama, etc., do NOT have any authority or standing to ask for the termination of a foreign inspector general, and it was clear the Ukraine has already been found guilty of stealing oil and gas from Russia at the International Court in the Hague, so Russia has been proven to be in the right.

If Hunter Biden was not a felon, then why was he paid millions to do nothing, with no experience, and not once even going to the Ukraine?

Yeah right. Another Russian liar is outed.

And not even a good one

 

[Lesh]

When Is Impeaching A President Warranted?

If not after inciting insurrection then never

 

[Claudette]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

It wasn't about the blow job dummy. He lied. Do some research idiot.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

When actual crimes are committed of course. Clinton lied to Congress. Nevermind his sex life, the fact he lied to Congress is a federal crime.

So, following that reasoning, it was warranted for the lie he told. Not his sexual escapades with young interns.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Incitement of insurrection to violently attack the U.S. Capitol to overthrow a legally certified presidential election.

Trump never did that, but if im wrong you will provide a quote, but you wont because, you are a weak debater.

You ask too much of him/her.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

How can we have a real discussion when your op is a lie?

 

[Lesh]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

When actual crimes are committed of course. Clinton lied to Congress. Nevermind his sex life, the fact he lied to Congress is a federal crime.

So, following that reasoning, it was warranted for the lie he told. Not his sexual escapades with young interns.

He lied about a BLOW JOB

A question that should never have been asked

 

[Wyatt earp]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

When actual crimes are committed of course. Clinton lied to Congress. Nevermind his sex life, the fact he lied to Congress is a federal crime.

So, following that reasoning, it was warranted for the lie he told. Not his sexual escapades with young interns.

He lied about a BLOW JOB

A question that should never have been asked

No one asked him if he got a blow job

 

[TemplarKormac]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

When actual crimes are committed of course. Clinton lied to Congress. Nevermind his sex life, the fact he lied to Congress is a federal crime.

So, following that reasoning, it was warranted for the lie he told. Not his sexual escapades with young interns.

He lied about a BLOW JOB

A question that should never have been asked

Regardless, he perjured congress. The law's the law.

 

[CowboyTed]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

You mean where a president takes trips to pedophile ilsand on the Loilita Express and then comes back and sexually harasses a young intern on the presidential desk? Gee wouldn't that get most CEOs fired?

Actually it wouldn't even get him admonished. The President didn't not go to Epstein's Island while in office. Not once. And Monica was a legal adult, in a consensual relationship with Bill Clinton, who she knew was married. He didn't "sexually harass" her or anyone else.

CEO's never get fired for sexually harassing interns. The girl is removed and paid off if she becomes a "problem". You don't live in the real world if you think otherwise.

Monica wasn't sexually harassed. She was a political groupie, who told friends she was "packing up her kneepads and going to Washington" after she graduated. She revelled in her part as "Presidential Mistress", right up until Republicans outed the relationship in the media, and turned her into a national laughingstock, forcing her to testfy against Bill Clinton.

So don't pretend that Bill Clinton was a predator here, or that the Republicans didn't abuse this girl and treat her far worse than Bill Clinton ever did. Monica nearly committed suicide over what Ken Starr did to her.

My big question about Clinton lying under oath. Why was the question allowed to be asked?

There must be a question of relevance concerning the investigation... The investigation had no guard rails...

Compare that to Trump, he managed to go these investigation and not testify...

Clinton lied and deserved to be impeached, the mitigating circumstances was that the question shouldn't have been asked. Monica had to have mother and herself threatened with jail if she didn't testify...

 

[B. Kidd]

Dimms have now weaponized the impeachment process.