Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The routers and the admin passwords for the machines.
Why do you tell such transparent lies?
www.washingtonexaminer.com
Latest on the Arizona audit. Republican shares data of the audit to verify that information is correct. Unfortunately the data show that election results were accurate. He was looking for validation from another source.
Now he has been barred from the audit by the republican in charge of the audit.
Information about the audit that favored the perception that the election results were tainted has been leak since the beginning. The guy leading the audit has been the most vocal and leaks information at will. Yet Republicans do not say anything about it. Well in fairness they have been leaking information also.
Now one of their own who has been involved with the audit shares the data to get another opinion about the conclusion from the data. It favors that the election results was correct.
The republicans quickly prevent the guy from participating in the current audit. He is not allowed in the building. I guess they hope that this silences him. Yet if you have a democracy why would you silence someone.
One would think that the audit should be open and information shared to the people. Yet the Arizona republican have shown by their action that if something goes against the results then they should go into block and ban mode. They are part of the state government. People have a right to know. Transparency should mean something. Yet they seem to be nervous that the direction of the audit is going in the wrong direction. It will be shown to be a waste of taxpayers money and whomever was foolish enough to send money to support it.
Other states who are looking to do this kind of audit should be watching closely. Do they really want to be part of this which will end badly for them. At the very least they should use a reputable auditor who is not vocal about preconceived opinions about election fraud.
Well I guess since many republicans support the preconceived conclusion then there should be no political backlash. Just another conspiracy that bites the dust but will live on in people's mind.
When is an audit not an audit. Well when the audit cannot be verify to be correct by a neutral 3rd party. When its only purpose is to rubberstamp pre existing beliefs at the cost of becoming the DEEP STATE.
yeah , yeah another thread on the Arizona audit. Hey but it has a new twist.
can't argue with thatOh.....Oh.....Oh....I know.
When it is a fucking shame put up by deluded RWNJ.
Arizona Senate issues audit subpoena for Maricopa County routers
The Republican-led Arizona Senate served a new subpoena to Maricopa County officials seeking routers for its audit of the 2020 election.
simply turn over the routers. there is zero personal info on the routers so anyone running to that, STFU before you begin. routers simply route into. IP# in, IP# out and base info.
however, since these were "not connected" to the internet, then the logs should be empty for this timeframe. but we know they were not.
meanwhile, someone going HA HA YOU FOOL in this forum, well their posts are allowed. however, if you dare to question the results, same topic is moved to the conspiracy forum.
speaks loudly of the bias here.
I posted 3 links read them.
Because they knew this request would be refused, as it compromises the personal data of many people, including law enforcement. They make the request knowing it will be refused, so that they can accuse someone of hiding something. Because they have literally ZERO evidence. All they have is theater.So far this audit is in Trouble that probably why in a last gasp for air they are saying we want to see the router records.
When you have to turn somersaults to make a false statement^^^^^-3,981 Voted Despite Being Registered AFTER the October 15th Deadline
-11,326 Voted Who Were NOT on the Voter Rolls November 7th, but Somehow Appeared on December 4th
information from the Arizona hearing has been debunked.
Here what a republican had to say
Jack Sellers, a Republican who chairs the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, released a statement accusing the firm of “incompetence” and saying county officials have “given you everything qualified auditors would need to do this job.”
Sellers said that “uncertified contractors” at the Senate hearing “asked a lot of open-ended questions, portraying as suspicious what is actually normal and well known to people who work in elections. In some cases, they dropped bombshell numbers that are simply not accurate.” Cyber Ninjas isn’t accredited by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Its CEO has also pushed election fraud claims on social media.
The telling thing is that they been at it a few months and still want access to the servers. Yet why would they need the servers if they have the above information. Does the above stuff they found show fraud.
Yet it seems it doesn't and now they want to dig deeper. Smacks of desperation. They found nothing and everything they found has been explained.
-11,326 Voted Who Were NOT on the Voter Rolls November 7th, but Somehow Appeared on December 4th
Maricopa County officials said that individuals who voted using provisional ballots and whose registration information wasn’t added to the voter rolls until after the necessary steps were taken to verify their eligibility to vote in the general election.
“These go through a rigorous verification process to make sure that the provisional ballots cast are only counted if the voter is eligible to vote in the election,” county officials wrote in a Twitter thread. “This happens after Election Day. Only eligible voters are added to the voter rolls.”
So it appears that voters names can be added to the roll in specific circumstances. They are verified for eligibility and if pass then the vote is counted and name added after election day.
A process that happens yet this what CN found. that could possibly indicated fraud. Yet all the republican websites just pick up the claim and yell fraud.
This ties into the 2nd point
-3,981 Voted Despite Being Registered AFTER the October 15th Deadline
So that is the process for provisional votes.
provisional votes are not counted if they are not registered. Yet the reason they are not registered is because the state removed their names from the voter roll for various reason such as not having voted in the past few elections. Yet people still believe they have registered.
Yet here is the kicker, the votes are not counted this election but they names once verified are then registered as a voter and are set to go for the next election.
Simple explanation but republican websites are alive with this information concluding voter fraud.
This is the information that CN provided to republicans yet they cry that the county did not cooperate and they just concluded that it was fraud.
So far this audit is in Trouble that probably why in a last gasp for air they are saying we want to see the router records.
When you have to turn somersaults to make a false statement^^^^^
When you have to turn somersaults to make a false statement^^^^^
www.theguardian.com
www.cyberninjas.com
