When is an audit not an audit

No they don't. They have their "results". Which they took back to Montana for secret "analysis".....
And the audit overseer just let the cat out of the bag...hope, it can be a terrible double edged sword.
The OP already posted a Newsweek link and I posted 3 links to debunk it. You're a little late on that one junior.
 

President Donald Trump supporters and American patriots nationwide are emboldened after an Arizona state Senate hearing on the Maricopa County election audit proved massive fraud.​


During the Arizona Senate hearing held yesterday on the ongoing Maricopa County forensic audit, one bombshell after another was revealed.
Pesky little discrepancies were discovered, minuscule irregularities that Democrats would rather not be talked about. Like the fact that over 74,000 more mail-in ballots were received and counted than were mailed out. Democrats: Big Deal!


-3,981 Voted Despite Being Registered AFTER the October 15th Deadline​

-11,326 Voted Who Were NOT on the Voter Rolls November 7th, but Somehow Appeared on December 4th​

-18,000 Voted, Then Were Removed from the Voter Rolls After the Election​

The margin of victory for Joe Biden in the State of Arizona was just 10,457 votes.
Still you seem to believe that what they found was valid. Yet it was just a hearing where the auditors report what they THINK they found.

It is hardly proof that it actually happen but hey if it make you sleep soundly at night. Go for it.

There has been no chance for rebuttal and no review by election officials to explain what they thing they say really matters or is accurate at all.

The auditors have no experience in doing voter audits. So this is a learning thing for them and once election official check the stats there will be rebuttals.

No one know what they are reviewing or where they get this information or how they interpret the data.

So wait until someone can review the auditors results and validate that they were correct.

A audit is wishful thinking. It has to be verified. A public hearing airing the results found by inexperience auditors has to be reviewed for correctness

example the auditors claim 74,000-plus ballot gap between the county's list of mail-in ballots received and its list of mail-in ballots sent out

Yet it clear the auditors made a mistake

The ballot list he was talking about included not only mail in ballots but also ballots cast early and in person.

People who receive mail in ballots have the option of mailing it in or dropping it off at polling places even before the last day of the election.

Simple mistake yet he pointed to it as suspicious.

Simple amateur mistake

but that what you get when you use an amateur. Expecting that he can do a better job that does who do this year after year.


You point to this -

-18,000 Voted, Then Were Removed from the Voter Rolls After the Election​

Logan revealed that around 18,000 people voted in the 2020 election in the county but were taken off of voter rolls “soon after the election.” “There could be a good, logical explanation for that,” said Logan. “But it seems like a large number to me to, after the election, be removed.”

The auditor is not saying that its fraud, he just saying he founds something but doesn't know what it means

Yet right wing sites no what it means

Still for a laymen it could be something simple as a vote was submitted and appears to invalid. Then it is purged from the databases. It would mean that the votes were discounted and not used in the total votes for a candidate. He is not saying that they were counted. He just saying votes were submitted and later purged.

Seems to be that what happens during elections. The votes are checked. Any irregularities would void the vote. Then they may even be removed from the voter rolls. So they did there job but it looks suspicious according to the auditor.

Then the person has to re-register if it was a mistake.
 
Arizona recently this month

After looking through more than three million ballots from the 2020 election, 182 cases turned up that were confusing enough that they were referred for further review. Four of these cases have led to actual charges of voter fraud. None of them involve someone voting more than once—though several of the cases involve people who tried to vote more than once and were stopped.

So they confirmed 4 cases of voter fraud and the rest will be reviewed as they don't know what happen. Still this is not a number that cost Trump the election in GA.
 
The OP already posted a Newsweek link and I posted 3 links to debunk it. You're a little late on that one junior.
You posted three alt-right links, none of which have the slightest credibility..fact wise. They are sites designed to keep the weak minded full with pablum...so it stays fresh in their minds and their wallets stay open. :)
 
You posted three alt-right links, none of which have the slightest credibility..fact wise. They are sites designed to keep the weak minded full with pablum...so it stays fresh in their minds and their wallets stay open.
3 conservative links vs one far left (Newsweek) link whose credibility is currently in the dumper.
 

President Donald Trump supporters and American patriots nationwide are emboldened after an Arizona state Senate hearing on the Maricopa County election audit proved massive fraud.​


During the Arizona Senate hearing held yesterday on the ongoing Maricopa County forensic audit, one bombshell after another was revealed.
Pesky little discrepancies were discovered, minuscule irregularities that Democrats would rather not be talked about. Like the fact that over 74,000 more mail-in ballots were received and counted than were mailed out. Democrats: Big Deal!


-3,981 Voted Despite Being Registered AFTER the October 15th Deadline​

-11,326 Voted Who Were NOT on the Voter Rolls November 7th, but Somehow Appeared on December 4th​

-18,000 Voted, Then Were Removed from the Voter Rolls After the Election​

The margin of victory for Joe Biden in the State of Arizona was just 10,457 votes.
1627167920501.png
 
Latest on the Arizona audit. Republican shares data of the audit to verify that information is correct. Unfortunately the data show that election results were accurate. He was looking for validation from another source.

Now he has been barred from the audit by the republican in charge of the audit.

Information about the audit that favored the perception that the election results were tainted has been leak since the beginning. The guy leading the audit has been the most vocal and leaks information at will. Yet Republicans do not say anything about it. Well in fairness they have been leaking information also.

Now one of their own who has been involved with the audit shares the data to get another opinion about the conclusion from the data. It favors that the election results was correct.

The republicans quickly prevent the guy from participating in the current audit. He is not allowed in the building. I guess they hope that this silences him. Yet if you have a democracy why would you silence someone.

One would think that the audit should be open and information shared to the people. Yet the Arizona republican have shown by their action that if something goes against the results then they should go into block and ban mode. They are part of the state government. People have a right to know. Transparency should mean something. Yet they seem to be nervous that the direction of the audit is going in the wrong direction. It will be shown to be a waste of taxpayers money and whomever was foolish enough to send money to support it.

Other states who are looking to do this kind of audit should be watching closely. Do they really want to be part of this which will end badly for them. At the very least they should use a reputable auditor who is not vocal about preconceived opinions about election fraud.

Well I guess since many republicans support the preconceived conclusion then there should be no political backlash. Just another conspiracy that bites the dust but will live on in people's mind.

When is an audit not an audit. Well when the audit cannot be verify to be correct by a neutral 3rd party. When its only purpose is to rubberstamp pre existing beliefs at the cost of becoming the DEEP STATE.

yeah , yeah another thread on the Arizona audit. Hey but it has a new twist.

When is an audit not an audit?
When the auditors come in seeking a predetermined outcome.
 
It is obvious by now that Cyber Ninjas have nothing to show
Obviously. This is why the Arizona Senate did not compile and release a report on their findings and evidence, and instead allowed the dumbfucks to sit and make unevidenced claims on television. They're not even trying to hide the con anymore. Why should they? their lobotomized target audience doesn't care. They are in on it.
 
The routers and the admin passwords for the machines.

Why do you tell such transparent lies?
Haha, look at you poor, gullible cultists, grasping for straws.... Desperately looking for reasons to present as reasons you have believed something for 8 months. Obvious, embarrassing intellectual fraud.
 

Forum List

Back
Top