Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,307
- 2,136
- 210
Latest on the Arizona audit. Republican shares data of the audit to verify that information is correct. Unfortunately the data show that election results were accurate. He was looking for validation from another source.
Now he has been barred from the audit by the republican in charge of the audit.
Information about the audit that favored the perception that the election results were tainted has been leak since the beginning. The guy leading the audit has been the most vocal and leaks information at will. Yet Republicans do not say anything about it. Well in fairness they have been leaking information also.
Now one of their own who has been involved with the audit shares the data to get another opinion about the conclusion from the data. It favors that the election results was correct.
The republicans quickly prevent the guy from participating in the current audit. He is not allowed in the building. I guess they hope that this silences him. Yet if you have a democracy why would you silence someone.
One would think that the audit should be open and information shared to the people. Yet the Arizona republican have shown by their action that if something goes against the results then they should go into block and ban mode. They are part of the state government. People have a right to know. Transparency should mean something. Yet they seem to be nervous that the direction of the audit is going in the wrong direction. It will be shown to be a waste of taxpayers money and whomever was foolish enough to send money to support it.
Other states who are looking to do this kind of audit should be watching closely. Do they really want to be part of this which will end badly for them. At the very least they should use a reputable auditor who is not vocal about preconceived opinions about election fraud.
Well I guess since many republicans support the preconceived conclusion then there should be no political backlash. Just another conspiracy that bites the dust but will live on in people's mind.
When is an audit not an audit. Well when the audit cannot be verify to be correct by a neutral 3rd party. When its only purpose is to rubberstamp pre existing beliefs at the cost of becoming the DEEP STATE.
yeah , yeah another thread on the Arizona audit. Hey but it has a new twist.
Now he has been barred from the audit by the republican in charge of the audit.
Information about the audit that favored the perception that the election results were tainted has been leak since the beginning. The guy leading the audit has been the most vocal and leaks information at will. Yet Republicans do not say anything about it. Well in fairness they have been leaking information also.
Now one of their own who has been involved with the audit shares the data to get another opinion about the conclusion from the data. It favors that the election results was correct.
The republicans quickly prevent the guy from participating in the current audit. He is not allowed in the building. I guess they hope that this silences him. Yet if you have a democracy why would you silence someone.
One would think that the audit should be open and information shared to the people. Yet the Arizona republican have shown by their action that if something goes against the results then they should go into block and ban mode. They are part of the state government. People have a right to know. Transparency should mean something. Yet they seem to be nervous that the direction of the audit is going in the wrong direction. It will be shown to be a waste of taxpayers money and whomever was foolish enough to send money to support it.
Other states who are looking to do this kind of audit should be watching closely. Do they really want to be part of this which will end badly for them. At the very least they should use a reputable auditor who is not vocal about preconceived opinions about election fraud.
Well I guess since many republicans support the preconceived conclusion then there should be no political backlash. Just another conspiracy that bites the dust but will live on in people's mind.
When is an audit not an audit. Well when the audit cannot be verify to be correct by a neutral 3rd party. When its only purpose is to rubberstamp pre existing beliefs at the cost of becoming the DEEP STATE.
yeah , yeah another thread on the Arizona audit. Hey but it has a new twist.
Last edited:
