Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be honest, your guess is as good as mine.Using that same logic OP, why is Trump so invested in keeping it under wraps?
Nope. You just can’t consider Joe ran on policies.Democrats could have but didn't. The election was the biggest opening they could have hoped for to release information like this.
If there were damning information in those files, you would have been sure that the Left would have saved it for the October surprise.
No. He didn't.Nope. You just can’t consider Joe ran on policies.
Joe released no dirt. This is all on Trump.No. He didn't.
Don't spout delusions.
We leftists told you exactly how we think. That's expected. We're liberals, so we state the truth clearly and directly, without evasions and sleaze.No. He didn't.
Don't spout delusions.
Fantasize all you wish.Joe released no dirt. This is all on Trump.
That's a lie on its face.We're liberals, so we state the truth clearly and directly, without evasions and sleaze.
It’s one of two things: Trump is playing a deep game, feigning weakness and insecurity like in “Shogun” where the play is so thorough his deputy commits seppuku, or, Trump is letting the pedos and their bankers continue to run eventsSimple question. If there had been any damning information about Trump in the Epstein files, don't you think that when the Democrats were in power, they would have released it? Of course! It was an election year, and they could have easily torpedoed his campaign with it. So, why not? If there was something so scandalous in those files about Trump, why didn't Democrats release it when they had unfettered access to the files during Biden's administration? They had plenty of chances.
The behavior doesn't match the narrative. It will continue not to, unless and until the files are released in full. I invite the leftists to stop acting like they know what's in the files. Just because his name appears in the files doesn't automatically imply any wrongdoing on Trump. That's not how any of this works. You give the benefit of the doubt until contrary evidence is given.
Simple question. If there had been any damning information about Trump in the Epstein files, don't you think that when the Democrats were in power, they would have released it? Of course! It was an election year, and they could have easily torpedoed his campaign with it. So, why not? If there was something so scandalous in those files about Trump, why didn't Democrats release it when they had unfettered access to the files during Biden's administration? They had plenty of chances.
The behavior doesn't match the narrative. It will continue not to, unless and until the files are released in full. I invite the leftists to stop acting like they know what's in the files. Just because his name appears in the files doesn't automatically imply any wrongdoing on Trump. That's not how any of this works. You give the benefit of the doubt until contrary evidence is given.
We leftists told you exactly how we think. That's expected. We're liberals, so we state the truth clearly and directly, without evasions and sleaze.
Instead of accepting that simple truth, you threw a tantrum. Bravo.
This isn't a debate. The simple explanation is that Democrats don't politicize the justice system.
Well..I'm on record as not thinking that any list even exists---I've always thought that the Epstein thing was conspiracy theory looking for a home.
1. If Trump was free and clear of anything to do with Epstein, he'd release the list. Not just the indictment information.
2. There are high profile democrats on the list too. So they couldn't release it. For the same reasons Trump can't.
This is easy stuff to figure out. Lying pedo's protecting lying pedo's.
There is no list, so no one is hiding anything. Why are you so certain a list ever existed?Democrats are on the list too. Both Republicans and Dems are hiding this.
Of course it does.To be honest, your guess is as good as mine.
What this does not do is make an inference on his actions or supposed dealings with Epstein.
Being on the list doesn't mean that person is guilty of a crime. Epstein has more than just a list. I want to see the surveillance videos on his island compound. That's should give us a hint who may be guilty of a crime.
First, the media said ICE deported an 82 year old man. That turned out to be 100% fake news. You can look it up. I have absolutely no reason to believe anything the media tell us.
![]()
White House hits back at reports Trump named in Epstein files
It came as a US judge denied a justice department's bid to unseal Florida court files on Epstein.www.yahoo.com
Being on the list doesn't mean that person is guilty of a crime. Epstein has more than just a list. I want to see the surveillance videos on his island compound. That's should give us a hint who may be guilty of a crime.
First, the media said ICE deported an 82 year old man. That turned out to be 100% fake news. You can look it up. I have absolutely no reason to believe anything the media tell us.
![]()
White House hits back at reports Trump named in Epstein files
It came as a US judge denied a justice department's bid to unseal Florida court files on Epstein.www.yahoo.com
When there is nothing on your mind but to assume his guilt, of course it does, yes.Of course it does.
There’s literally no other reason he’d be trying to block the release of the information.
There is no list, so no one is hiding anything. Why are you so certain a list ever existed?