What's the upside to accepting a US President threatening Blackmail

The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.

You do know that their are 2 parties right? So again, what is the upside if this is accepted from a President? And what happen's when it's aimed at someone you like? Will you see how it's not beneficial then?
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
Dream on
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
Dream on
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.

You do know that their are 2 parties right? So again, what is the upside if this is accepted from a President? And what happen's when it's aimed at someone you like? Will you see how it's not beneficial then?
Kinda like Obama blackmailed public schools withholding federal funds if boys couldn't use girls bathrooms?
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.

You do know that their are 2 parties right? So again, what is the upside if this is accepted from a President? And what happen's when it's aimed at someone you like? Will you see how it's not beneficial then?

miketx is too stupid and too dishonest (very likely both) to give a damn about a reasonable post as the one posted by CC.
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
Dream on
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
Dream on
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
Dream on
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman

Why would anyone with half a brain suggest if you took a state out of the national vote, one candidate would win? The national vote (popular vote) is one where every vote in every state counts towards the total.

Do you know what a moron you look like when you regurgitate this rightwing talking point?
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
Dream on
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman

Why would anyone with half a brain suggest if you took a state out of the national vote, one candidate would win? The national vote (popular vote) is one where every vote in every state counts towards the total.

Do you know what a moron you look like when you regurg
 
No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

I had a clear impression from the reaction to the vote that many of you people had no clue whatsoever about the Electoral College, especially among your Millennial supporters. It was a big surprise.

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

You just contradicted yourself. The Electoral College is constitutionally mandated. It is no fluke.
 
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman

Why would anyone with half a brain suggest if you took a state out of the national vote, one candidate would win? The national vote (popular vote) is one where every vote in every state counts towards the total.

Do you know what a moron you look like when you regurgitate this rightwing talking point?
If you take California out of the equation the rest of the country wanted Trump to win the popular vote. And by the way you apparently don't realize the electoral college always determines the president.
 
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman

Why would anyone with half a brain suggest if you took a state out of the national vote, one candidate would win? The national vote (popular vote) is one where every vote in every state counts towards the total.

Do you know what a moron you look like when you regurgitate this rightwing talking point?
If you take California out of the equation the rest of the country wanted Trump to win the popular vote. And by the way you apparently don't realize the electoral college always determines the president.
 
No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

I had a clear impression from the reaction to the vote that many of you people had no clue whatsoever about the Electoral College, especially among your Millennial supporters. It was a big surprise.

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

You just contradicted yourself. The Electoral College is constitutionally mandated. It is no fluke.
Hey pay attention!

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way. Which makes how he won the ec, a fluke in the system.

Pointing out a flaw or a fluke in the system, is not suggesting the system is not constitutionally mandated?

Calling all Straw Men!!! aaronleland has been replaced by Billy_Kinetta
 
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
Dream on
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman

Thanks so much for sharing your own special reality, it is always so ... special.
 
On citizens?

Isn't this what you guys feared about government having too much power?

What happens when the threats go toward someone you do like?

Interesting, isn't it. Apparently, trump is above the law.
The Clintons have always been above the law
Why must you always attempt to deflect?

You do not deny Trump acts like he is above the law. What you do is suggest it's okay.

And what is it exactly that Trump has done that's illegal?
 
worth a grin
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.

We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.

But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?

Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
:itsok:
Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman

Why would anyone with half a brain suggest if you took a state out of the national vote, one candidate would win? The national vote (popular vote) is one where every vote in every state counts towards the total.

Do you know what a moron you look like when you regurgitate this rightwing talking point?
If you take California out of the equation the rest of the country wanted Trump to win the popular vote. And by the way you apparently don't realize the electoral college always determines the president.

election-2016-county-map.png

:itsok:
 
If you take California out of the equation the rest of the country wanted Trump to win the popular vote. And by the way you apparently don't realize the electoral college always determines the president.

election-2016-county-map.png

:itsok:

If you take California out of the equation, you do not have the popular vote


:rofl:
 
If you take California out of the equation the rest of the country wanted Trump to win the popular vote. And by the way you apparently don't realize the electoral college always determines the president.

election-2016-county-map.png

:itsok:

If you take California out of the equation, you do not have the popular vote


:rofl:
 

Forum List

Back
Top