Whats going on with Clay Higgins ?

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
57,965
Reaction score
26,707
Points
2,300
Location
Y Cae Ras
This is bizzarre. Only 1 rep voted against releasing the epstein files.Clay Higgins.
I have never heard of him. But he is probably from one of those shit kicking southern states.
Its a perverse vote for paedos.
Is Ckay just an oddball or is it likely that he is in the files himself ?
I think he should be investigated by Ms Bondis dept of "justice".


 
This is bizzarre. Only 1 rep voted against releasing the epstein files.Clay Higgins.
I have never heard of him. But he is probably from one of those shit kicking southern states.
Its a perverse vote for paedos.
Is Ckay just an oddball or is it likely that he is in the files himself ?
I think he should be investigated by Ms Bondis dept of "justice".


The objection is about privacy. As in, for example, measures taken to not reveal kids' names.

He is for the bill, but wants it amended. Hardly uncommon for any bill.

It won't matter anyway. It's not like criminals keep a who's who of pedos and detail their criminal activity.
 
Clay votes the way every Democrat voted…and it is sus.

😂

Think about how ******* stupid that is.
 
The objection is about privacy. As in, for example, measures taken to not reveal kids' names.

He is for the bill, but wants it amended. Hardly uncommon for any bill.

It won't matter anyway. It's not like criminals keep a who's who of pedos and detail their criminal activity.
What amendmnts did he put forward to protect victims ?
 
This is bizzarre. Only 1 rep voted against releasing the epstein files.Clay Higgins.
I have never heard of him. But he is probably from one of those shit kicking southern states.
Its a perverse vote for paedos.
Is Ckay just an oddball or is it likely that he is in the files himself ?
I think he should be investigated by Ms Bondis dept of "justice".



Good Lord, and just because the man voted in line with his principles, instead of some 'all or nothing' expectation seasoned generously by your degree of depravity and political nonsense, does not require that you turn what he indicated into the same old shit show.

Instead of just running here with tabloid style garbage, and a kindergarten approach, is it too much to ask for you to actually try and understand what the man was really doing? You don't even have to agree with him, but any disagreement you may have doesn't automatically make him the worst thing your screwed up mind can come up with.
 
Good Lord, and just because the man voted in line with his principles, instead of some 'all or nothing' expectation seasoned generously by your degree of depravity and political nonsense, does not require that you turn what he indicated into the same old shit show.

Instead of just running here with tabloid style garbage, and a kindergarten approach, is it too much to ask for you to actually try and understand what the man was really doing? You don't even have to agree with him, but any disagreement you may have doesn't automatically make him the worst thing your screwed up mind can come up with.
Yup he voted to protect paedos. Itsn ot like he voted to impeach trump. That would need investigating.
 
15th post
Higgins did the right thing by voting no.
 
Orange Man is gonna Veto it.

Watch and see...
It's veto proof. He can't. Too many voted to release it....

So, it is likely why Trump went from the files being a Hoax hoax democratic Hoax....

A hoax to Trump demanding NOW... that the DOJ open investigations in to Clinton and Larry Summers for their alleged crimes....DOJ can not release the files when there is an OFFICIAL open Investigation...

That's his next, preplanned trick....imo....we'll see how long it will take to get around that one...
 
Back
Top Bottom