Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 19,638
- 35,712
- 2,430
When did this happen?
While you've been sleeping and posting propaganda against Trump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When did this happen?
^paraphrased^....during the Carter presidency that image symbolized our foreign policy.our embassy is being overrun and they're using helos to evacuate the building.
It was built as a fortress in a lost cause; it will become someone else's fortress. Most likely our perceived enemy's.^paraphrased^....during the Carter presidency that image symbolized our foreign policy.
Non sequiturIt was built as a fortress in a lost cause; it will become someone else's fortress. Most likely our perceived enemy's.
Not sure what the point of this is but if they're only "perceived enemies" then it's no big dealIt was built as a fortress in a lost cause; it will become someone else's fortress. Most likely our perceived enemy's.
All enemies are perceived as such, until they are not.Not sure what the point of this is but if they're only "perceived enemies" then it's no big deal
I had that fortune cookie onceAll enemies are perceived as such, until they are not.
Translation:
We did what the US wanted, based on false info given to us by the known liars in our Intelligence Communities.
Close to a million people were killed and nobody will demand we be charged with war crimes.
The "Rules Based Order" means we don't have to follow any rule
Translation:
We did what the US wanted, based on false info given to us by the known liars in our Intelligence Communities.
Close to a million people were killed and nobody will demand we be charged with war crimes.
The "Rules Based Order" means we don't have to follow any rule
Look at the other side, Saddam Hussein murdered between 250,000 and 290,000
during his reign of terror from 1988 to 1991. Most during the Anfal genocide in 1988. Beging his regime with that one single horrific act ensured that he would be feared by everyone and the artificial country, that never should have been in the first place, would remain intact. Life is never perfect, not with humans involved. Sometimes there are no good solutions. Even today, we want to believe there will be a different outcome for the artificial, disunified state.
Iraq had it's boundaries drawn up by the English and French. The country includes 3 different warring ethnic groups which never should have been thrown together. The only thing that did was to create continuous disunity and warfare among the groups. That's never going to change. At least not for hundreds of years. The cost is to high for it's continued existence. And no I haven't been there for ages. Nothing has changed.Artificial country? Have you ever been to Iraq?
That's the truth, however you may have to spell it out to Surada.Iraq had it's boundaries drawn up by the English and French. The country includes 3 different warring ethnic groups which never should have been thrown together. The only thing that did was to create continuous disunity and warfare among the groups. That's never going to change. At least not for hundreds of years. The cost is to high for it's continued existence. And no I haven't been there for ages. Nothing has changed.
Surada is a reasonable man, I am confident he will acknowledge the situation for what it is.Tats the truth, however you may have to spell it out to Surada.
Britain and the Middle East from 1914 to the Present | Encyclopedia.com
**********![]()
Why border lines drawn with a ruler in WW1 still rock the Middle East
Writer Tarek Osman traces many of the current problems in the Middle East to the secret Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916www.bbc.com
In Rwanda in the 1990s, 10 times as many people were killed in a couple of years. Why didn't the U.S. and NATO intervene?Look at the other side, Saddam Hussein murdered between 250,000 and 290,000
~~~~~~In Rwanda in the 1990s, 10 times as many people were killed in a couple of years. Why didn't the U.S. and NATO intervene?
Rwanda isn't at a strategic crossroads, not all atrocities are equal. China murdered 30 million during their revolution. No one was overly concerned about that, look at all the deaths in russia with their regime changes which has crippled the Russian people's capacity to function normally to this dayIn Rwanda in the 1990s, 10 times as many people were killed in a couple of years. Why didn't the U.S. and NATO intervene?
I gotta see proof of that claim. Were you even alive in 1988? In 1988 I was listening to "Pour Some Sugar on me" and flirting successfully with a friend's hot, tall cousin with the curly brunette hair.Look at the other side, Saddam Hussein murdered between 250,000 and 290,000
during his reign of terror from 1988 to 1991. Most during the Anfal genocide in 1988. Beging his regime with that one single horrific act ensured that he would be feared by everyone and the artificial country, that never should have been in the first place, would remain intact. Life is never perfect, not with humans involved. Sometimes there are no good solutions. Even today, we want to believe there will be a different outcome for the artificial, disunified state.