What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[night_son]

Those against abortion don't know these many woman who want one and never will. they don't know their circumstances and don't care to know. they only want to control what they do. This decision should be between the woman and her doctor and NO ONE ELSE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>PERIOD!!!

You men out there, would you be okay with the government telling you what medical procedure you could have, or what medication you could take? This is what many of you are advocating for the women of this country, and don't give me this shit about the sanctity of life, especially when your only concern for that "precious life" is until it clears the birth canal.

I have seen many of you telling her to keep her legs closed. Do you whack off every night instead of wanting to have sex with a woman because she chose to do what you told her to do? Or, do you try to have sex with every woman you've ever dated and to hell with that closed legs bullshit?

finally, men can buy condoms at every drug store and grocery store in this country, so why don't you put on one to prevent her from getting pregnant? Oh I know, because it just doesn't feel good! Birth control is a woman's responsibility. Well boys, if you force women to have babies they don't want, then dig deep into your wallets because you will be paying for those "precious babies" for the next 18 years!

Circumstance, of the individual, does not replace tens of thousands of years of the biological cycle of our species. You are arguing against the very definition of human reproductive responsibility; trying to replace that primeval responsibility (of motherhood) with personal choice. Can a human female choose not to become a mother? She can. Abstain. Self-control. Can she choose not to be a woman? No, biologically, she can not--same as a male human being must accept responsibility for being biologically, a man.

Once pre-birth motherhood has been entered into, and according to eons of human biological and instinctual imperative, a woman's species primacy is defending her unborn child developing in the womb, and hopefully, for the following eighteen years, at least. Just as a pre-birth father's species imperative is providing for the mother-to-be, defending her and, after birth, continuing to provide for and defend his new family. That is the cycle of human life since time out of mind. No style, no fashion, no excuses for blaming self biological sexual identity or societal cultural trends can ever change that.

 

[Weatherman2020]

No matter the topic, the Left always side with death.

 

[JBvM]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

If the operative phrase is Unborn Children then I suggest you think about that

Unborn. So they are not yet born or really children, since children have to exist outside of a womb. You can't feed them, hold them, take them away - wait you can take them away, by violating every single right of a woman

 

[Moonglow]

The GOP is always about smaller, less intrusive govt. but not of the uterus..

Overturning Roe v Wade would SHRINK the government, imbecile.

I am sure it wouldn't...

 

[Moonglow]

No matter the topic, the Left always side with death.

So you are anti-capital punishment and are a conscientious objector?

 

[Weatherman2020]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

If the operative phrase is Unborn Children then I suggest you think about that

Unborn. So they are not yet born or really children, since children have to exist outside of a womb. You can't feed them, hold them, take them away - wait you can take them away, by violating every single right of a woman

Lie.
Many states you kill the unborn its murder and you go to prison.

 

[Weatherman2020]

No matter the topic, the Left always side with death.

So you are anti-capital punishment and are a conscientious objector?

Only a moonbat can equate a baby with a 1st degree murderer, congrats.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The left are fine with bank robbers getting more prison time than the average murderer.

 

[night_son]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

If the operative phrase is Unborn Children then I suggest you think about that

Unborn. So they are not yet born or really children, since children have to exist outside of a womb. You can't feed them, hold them, take them away - wait you can take them away, by violating every single right of a woman

Of course the mother-to-be is feeding the unborn child developing her womb with nutrients from her own caloric intake and reserves, and as abortionists have proven, the unborn child can be taken away from her, held, and its divided remains marketed. No different than the killer of a pregnant woman who takes trophies.

 

[Borillar]

No matter the topic, the Left always side with death.

So you are anti-capital punishment and are a conscientious objector?

Only a moonbat can equate a baby with a 1st degree murderer, congrats.

You're the one claiming the left always sides with death. Yet you're the one who is pro death penalty and pro war.

 

[JBvM]

Lie.
Many states you kill the unborn its murder and you go to prison.

that has to do with evolving life in a woman's body. you are a bit confused

 

[JBvM]

Of course the mother-to-be is feeding the unborn child developing her womb with nutrients from her own caloric intake and reserves, and as abortionists have proven, the unborn child can be taken away from her, held, and its divided remains marketed. No different than the killer of a pregnant woman who takes trophies.

actually as different as it can get

your sickness is inhuman

 

[Moonglow]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

If the operative phrase is Unborn Children then I suggest you think about that

Unborn. So they are not yet born or really children, since children have to exist outside of a womb. You can't feed them, hold them, take them away - wait you can take them away, by violating every single right of a woman

Lie.
Many states you kill the unborn its murder and you go to prison.

Not when it's an abortion.

 

[Borillar]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Most abortions are black children, that's why the left say we must keep abortion mills in operation.

Go out and adopt a couple then.

Dumbass.

Thirty-Six Couples Wait for Every One Baby Who is Adopted | LifeNews.com

Better go get in line then.

Dumbass.

Why not just go and make your own babies if you can find a woman willing to sleep with you, and leave other people's decisions to them?

 

[JBvM]

I guess you people believe an egg is a chicken

 

[Weatherman2020]

Lie.
Many states you kill the unborn its murder and you go to prison.

that has to do with evolving life in a woman's body. you are a bit confused

There are children having dinner now who were born before the legal abortion age.

You are declared dead when your heart stops.
Abortion stops a beating heart.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I guess you people believe an egg is a chicken

Go break a spotted owl egg on YouTube and let us know how many years in prison you get.

 

[night_son]

No matter the topic, the Left always side with death.

So you are anti-capital punishment and are a conscientious objector?

Logic for the challenged:

Convicted criminal
-He kills someone. Consequence of killing: execution. He is held to personal responsibility.

Aborted unborn Child:
-Has committed no crime. Consequence of mother-to-be's desire for abortion: death. The mother is not held responsible for her termination of a life.

Expectant Mother who aborts:
-Gets pregnant. Consequence of her action: pregnancy; carry and give birth to child. Society transfers mother's responsibility for pregnancy to unborn child.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Most abortions are black children, that's why the left say we must keep abortion mills in operation.

Go out and adopt a couple then.

Dumbass.

Thirty-Six Couples Wait for Every One Baby Who is Adopted | LifeNews.com

Better go get in line then.

Dumbass.

Why not just go and make your own babies if you can find a woman willing to sleep with you, and leave other people's decisions to them?

You really get off murdering babies, don't you.

 

[Moonglow]

No matter the topic, the Left always side with death.

So you are anti-capital punishment and are a conscientious objector?

Logic for the challenged:

Convicted criminal
-He kills someone. Consequence of killing: execution. He is held to personal responsibility.

Aborted unborn Child:
-Has committed no crime. Consequence of mother-to-be's desire for abortion: death. The mother is not held responsible for her termination of a life.

Expectant Mother who aborts:
-Gets pregnant. Consequence of her action: pregnancy; carry and give birth to child. Society transfers mother's responsibility for pregnancy to unborn child.

Life is a bitch