What would a socialist America look like?

No they do not. The federal doctrines and state laws most certainly do not support your contention that unemployment compensation should be expanded to become welfare. Nor do they support the contention that tax dollars should be used to support people who have the means to support themselves.
Yes, they do. You are simply being frivolous at the expense of the Poor.

What laws or doctrines agree with you?
A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Any denial or disparagement is an Infringement.

Please point out any post I made that denies or disparages the legal concept of employment at will. I haven't.

No, you are simply dodging what I have said and refusing to stay on topic.

Yes, employment is At Will. But that does not mean unemployment compensation is paid if you quit or are fired for cause.
that is an Infringement.

No it is not. It is an accepted rule or law. If you quit the job, you have shown you did not want work. If you are fired for cause, it is obvious you did not want the job and refused to follow the rules (firings for cause often involve theft, harrassment or some serious violation).

You don't get paid for those.
 
You ignorant ass. Raising minimum wage increases inflation and increases unemployment.

The globalists deliberately do that and make idiots like you think raising minimum wage helps communities.

Minimum wage employees are not supposed look at those jobs as fucking careers.

More seduction of the ignorant. Meaning the BLAAAACKS.

You morons.
is it any wonder, nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or politics.
It is no wonder that you don't get anything. You a white liberal female?

Commiefornia is doing just great, if you are a rich liberal you stupid fucking moron.

Inflation is going through the roof and businesses are closing as a result of the minimum wage increases you stupid fucking moron.

Even certain actors (left wing idiots) are seeing what minimum wage increases have done to their famous old theater.

Actors’ Equity To Require Minimum Wage At LA’s 99-Seat Theaters, But Smaller Stages Get A Break


That, of course not hyped by the marxist globalist media.

Bet you never heard of it you fucking ignorant moron.

You are a fucking ignorant idiot.
higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Higher paid labor also creates higher expenses for production. This causes increases in costs. Which are passed on to the consumer.
yes, higher paid labor can afford it better while paying more in taxes and creating more in demand.

If the increase is eaten by the higher prices?

Higher wages also increase the demand for automation. Which has done away with more good paying jobs than any other single cause.
 
So Daniel, lets try my question again.

Why do you think the gov't should pay out tax money to individuals without determining if they can support themselves?
 
Yes, they do. You are simply being frivolous at the expense of the Poor.

What laws or doctrines agree with you?
A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Any denial or disparagement is an Infringement.

Please point out any post I made that denies or disparages the legal concept of employment at will. I haven't.

No, you are simply dodging what I have said and refusing to stay on topic.

Yes, employment is At Will. But that does not mean unemployment compensation is paid if you quit or are fired for cause.
that is an Infringement.

No it is not. It is an accepted rule or law. If you quit the job, you have shown you did not want work. If you are fired for cause, it is obvious you did not want the job and refused to follow the rules (firings for cause often involve theft, harrassment or some serious violation).

You don't get paid for those.
You are simply being frivolous at the Expense of the Poor.
 
is it any wonder, nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or politics.
It is no wonder that you don't get anything. You a white liberal female?

Commiefornia is doing just great, if you are a rich liberal you stupid fucking moron.

Inflation is going through the roof and businesses are closing as a result of the minimum wage increases you stupid fucking moron.

Even certain actors (left wing idiots) are seeing what minimum wage increases have done to their famous old theater.

Actors’ Equity To Require Minimum Wage At LA’s 99-Seat Theaters, But Smaller Stages Get A Break


That, of course not hyped by the marxist globalist media.

Bet you never heard of it you fucking ignorant moron.

You are a fucking ignorant idiot.
higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Higher paid labor also creates higher expenses for production. This causes increases in costs. Which are passed on to the consumer.
yes, higher paid labor can afford it better while paying more in taxes and creating more in demand.

If the increase is eaten by the higher prices?

Higher wages also increase the demand for automation. Which has done away with more good paying jobs than any other single cause.
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment that covers it.
 
No they do not. The federal doctrines and state laws most certainly do not support your contention that unemployment compensation should be expanded to become welfare. Nor do they support the contention that tax dollars should be used to support people who have the means to support themselves.
Yes, they do. You are simply being frivolous at the expense of the Poor.

What laws or doctrines agree with you?
A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Any denial or disparagement is an Infringement.

Please point out any post I made that denies or disparages the legal concept of employment at will. I haven't.

No, you are simply dodging what I have said and refusing to stay on topic.

Yes, employment is At Will. But that does not mean unemployment compensation is paid if you quit or are fired for cause.
that is an Infringement.

So, if an employee is caught stealing or assaulting a fellow employee, you would have him paid from additional payroll taxes?
 
It is no wonder that you don't get anything. You a white liberal female?

Commiefornia is doing just great, if you are a rich liberal you stupid fucking moron.

Inflation is going through the roof and businesses are closing as a result of the minimum wage increases you stupid fucking moron.

Even certain actors (left wing idiots) are seeing what minimum wage increases have done to their famous old theater.

Actors’ Equity To Require Minimum Wage At LA’s 99-Seat Theaters, But Smaller Stages Get A Break


That, of course not hyped by the marxist globalist media.

Bet you never heard of it you fucking ignorant moron.

You are a fucking ignorant idiot.
higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Higher paid labor also creates higher expenses for production. This causes increases in costs. Which are passed on to the consumer.
yes, higher paid labor can afford it better while paying more in taxes and creating more in demand.

If the increase is eaten by the higher prices?

Higher wages also increase the demand for automation. Which has done away with more good paying jobs than any other single cause.
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment that covers it.

And the additional cost will make investing in automation more cost effective and efficient. And so the position vanishes completely.
 
So Daniel, lets try my question again.

Why do you think the gov't should pay out tax money to individuals without determining if they can support themselves?
equal protection of the law.

Equal protection of the law? That is ridiculous.

If a person has the means to support themselves, why should tax payers be forced to provide additional support? That is not even close to equal protection of the law. No more so than requiring a hospital to provide the same amount of care for a small cut and a major heart attack.
 
What laws or doctrines agree with you?
A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Any denial or disparagement is an Infringement.

Please point out any post I made that denies or disparages the legal concept of employment at will. I haven't.

No, you are simply dodging what I have said and refusing to stay on topic.

Yes, employment is At Will. But that does not mean unemployment compensation is paid if you quit or are fired for cause.
that is an Infringement.

No it is not. It is an accepted rule or law. If you quit the job, you have shown you did not want work. If you are fired for cause, it is obvious you did not want the job and refused to follow the rules (firings for cause often involve theft, harrassment or some serious violation).

You don't get paid for those.
You are simply being frivolous at the Expense of the Poor.

Not at all. I am simply conserving the assets of the unemployment compensation for those who are unemployed through no fault of their own and who need those assets to survive until they find other work.
 
higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Higher paid labor also creates higher expenses for production. This causes increases in costs. Which are passed on to the consumer.
yes, higher paid labor can afford it better while paying more in taxes and creating more in demand.

If the increase is eaten by the higher prices?

Higher wages also increase the demand for automation. Which has done away with more good paying jobs than any other single cause.
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment that covers it.

And the additional cost will make investing in automation more cost effective and efficient. And so the position vanishes completely.
no, it doesn't. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.
 
A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Any denial or disparagement is an Infringement.

Please point out any post I made that denies or disparages the legal concept of employment at will. I haven't.

No, you are simply dodging what I have said and refusing to stay on topic.

Yes, employment is At Will. But that does not mean unemployment compensation is paid if you quit or are fired for cause.
that is an Infringement.

No it is not. It is an accepted rule or law. If you quit the job, you have shown you did not want work. If you are fired for cause, it is obvious you did not want the job and refused to follow the rules (firings for cause often involve theft, harrassment or some serious violation).

You don't get paid for those.
You are simply being frivolous at the Expense of the Poor.

Not at all. I am simply conserving the assets of the unemployment compensation for those who are unemployed through no fault of their own and who need those assets to survive until they find other work.
The law is employment at the will of either party. Why do you advocate being illegal to the law or complain about less fortunate illegals?
 
Higher paid labor also creates higher expenses for production. This causes increases in costs. Which are passed on to the consumer.
yes, higher paid labor can afford it better while paying more in taxes and creating more in demand.

If the increase is eaten by the higher prices?

Higher wages also increase the demand for automation. Which has done away with more good paying jobs than any other single cause.
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment that covers it.

And the additional cost will make investing in automation more cost effective and efficient. And so the position vanishes completely.
no, it doesn't. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It still increases the cost of payroll. Automation takes a large investment and has much lower costs in the long run.
 
Please point out any post I made that denies or disparages the legal concept of employment at will. I haven't.

No, you are simply dodging what I have said and refusing to stay on topic.

Yes, employment is At Will. But that does not mean unemployment compensation is paid if you quit or are fired for cause.
that is an Infringement.

No it is not. It is an accepted rule or law. If you quit the job, you have shown you did not want work. If you are fired for cause, it is obvious you did not want the job and refused to follow the rules (firings for cause often involve theft, harrassment or some serious violation).

You don't get paid for those.
You are simply being frivolous at the Expense of the Poor.

Not at all. I am simply conserving the assets of the unemployment compensation for those who are unemployed through no fault of their own and who need those assets to survive until they find other work.
The law is employment at the will of either party. Why do you advocate being illegal to the law or complain about less fortunate illegals?

Yes, you keep saying that. And you keep lying about my advocating being illegal or complaining about less fortunate illegals. I have done neither. So stop lying (or story-telling).

The will of both parties is important. When you exercise your will to quit, you leave behind the job AND the paycheck. You are not forced to continue to work. And when you exercise your will to break the rules (stealing, harassment, ect ect) you lose the job and the paycheck.

Now, why do you think you should get tax money if you can support yourself? Why does your greed and laziness outweigh the right of people to keep the money they earned?
 
yes, higher paid labor can afford it better while paying more in taxes and creating more in demand.

If the increase is eaten by the higher prices?

Higher wages also increase the demand for automation. Which has done away with more good paying jobs than any other single cause.
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment that covers it.

And the additional cost will make investing in automation more cost effective and efficient. And so the position vanishes completely.
no, it doesn't. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It still increases the cost of payroll. Automation takes a large investment and has much lower costs in the long run.
employment is at will.
 
Seems like the word "socialism" has lost a lot of its fear just during my lifetime. At one time a socialist nation would certainly change into a communist nation in a matter of weeks. I wonder if our Social Security program changed any of that fear?
 
Seems like the word "socialism" has lost a lot of its fear just during my lifetime. At one time a socialist nation would certainly change into a communist nation in a matter of weeks. I wonder if our Social Security program changed any of that fear?
As I have been saying and Wikipedia agrees. Socialism used to be defined as USSR, now it's more like France Scandinavia Australia.
 
Seems like the word "socialism" has lost a lot of its fear just during my lifetime. At one time a socialist nation would certainly change into a communist nation in a matter of weeks. I wonder if our Social Security program changed any of that fear?
As I have been saying and Wikipedia agrees. Socialism used to be defined as USSR, now it's more like France Scandinavia Australia.
But in the brainwashed Cold War dinosaur GOP, it hasn't changed
 
If the increase is eaten by the higher prices?

Higher wages also increase the demand for automation. Which has done away with more good paying jobs than any other single cause.
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment that covers it.

And the additional cost will make investing in automation more cost effective and efficient. And so the position vanishes completely.
no, it doesn't. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It still increases the cost of payroll. Automation takes a large investment and has much lower costs in the long run.
employment is at will.

Jeez dude, are you that ignorant? I have not argued once that employment is not at will. But there are consequences to quitting a job. Just as there are consequences to stealing or breaking whatever rule you broke to be fired.

And there is no federal doctrine or state law that says someone with assets to support themselves should be given support from tax dollars.

Please answer my question. What is wrong with a means test prior to receiving tax dollars to support you?
 
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment that covers it.

And the additional cost will make investing in automation more cost effective and efficient. And so the position vanishes completely.
no, it doesn't. higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

It still increases the cost of payroll. Automation takes a large investment and has much lower costs in the long run.
employment is at will.

Jeez dude, are you that ignorant? I have not argued once that employment is not at will. But there are consequences to quitting a job. Just as there are consequences to stealing or breaking whatever rule you broke to be fired.

And there is no federal doctrine or state law that says someone with assets to support themselves should be given support from tax dollars.

Please answer my question. What is wrong with a means test prior to receiving tax dollars to support you?
i am not the one appealing to ignorance of the law or being frivolous at the expense of the Poor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top