What We Believe, Part 1

I'm curious Carla_Danger what you find amusing about the video ?



She's stupid, and not just the sort of stupid that works at Taco Bell and can't get a drive thru order right, but the sort of stupid who gets beat up by her "boyfriend", calls police and attacks them when they take away her "boyfriend".

The sort of tool that will not watch this video and argue about the substance, but will ridicule it while getting butthurt over the fact that such "hate speech" is allowed by her beloved government to invade her safe space.

She's actually a level of Weapons Grade Stupid. She wouldn't still steal our oxygen if child proof lids stopped her from eating a bottle of children's aspirin because you know her parents were too stupid to keep it out of her reach.


 
I'm curious Carla_Danger what you find amusing about the video ?



She's stupid, and not just the sort of stupid that works at Taco Bell and can't get a drive thru order right, but the sort of stupid who gets beat up by her "boyfriend", calls police and attacks them when they take away her "boyfriend".

The sort of tool that will not watch this video and argue about the substance, but will ridicule it while getting butthurt over the fact that such "hate speech" is allowed by her beloved government to invade her safe space.

She's actually a level of Weapons Grade Stupid. She wouldn't still steal our oxygen if child proof lids stopped her from eating a bottle of children's aspirin because you know her parents were too stupid to keep it out of her reach.

"Weapons Grade Stupid" priceless.
 
Only 1:36 in, and he already has shown he isn't a real conservative.

"In the state of nature, every man hath an equal right by honest means to acquire property, and to enjoy it; in general, to pursue his own happiness, and none can consistently controul or interrupt him in the pursuit. But, so turbulent are the passions of some, and so selfish the feelings of others, that in such a state, there being no social compact, the weak cannot always be protected from the violence of the strong, nor the honest and unsuspecting from the arts and intrigues of the selfish and cunning. Hence it is easy to conceive, that men, naturally formed for society, were inclined to enter into mutual compact for the better security of their natural rights. In this state of society, the unalienable rights of nature are held sacred:--And each member is entitled to an equal share of all the social rights. No man can of right become possessed of a greater share: If any one usurps it, he so far becomes a tyrant; and when he can obtain sufficient strength, the people will feel the rod of a tyrant. Or, if this exclusive privilege can be supposed to be held in virtue of compact, it argues a very capital defect; and the people, when more enlightened, will alter their compact, and extinguish the very idea."
-- Samuel Adams; to the Legislature of Massachusetts (Jan. 17, 1794)

"Self-interest, or rather self-love, or egoism, has been more plausibly substituted as the basis of morality. But I consider our relations with others as constituting the boundaries of morality. With ourselves we stand on the ground of identity, not of relation, which last, requiring two subjects, excludes self-love confined to a single one. To ourselves, in strict language, we can owe no duties, obligation requiring also two parties. Self-love, therefore, is no part of morality. Indeed it is exactly its counterpart. It is the sole antagonist of virtue, leading us constantly by our propensities to self-gratification in violation of our moral duties to others."
-- Thomas Jefferson; from letter to Thomas Law (June 13, 1814)
 

Forum List

Back
Top