What Trump needs to ask all Americans Thursday night.

[Toddsterpatriot]

But they are, so if you live in New York you should push the legislature to change that law.

The judge can't.

They were specified.

They just didn't have to agree on which one it was because Trump was not charged with those crimes.

But they are, so if you live in New York you should push the legislature to change that law.

Or a higher court will reverse because of the many errors.

They were specified.

Were they?

They just didn't have to agree on which one it was

Yeah, that sounds like a very big reversible error.

because Trump was not charged with those crimes.

That too.

 

[jc456]

They just didn't have to agree on which one it was because Trump was not charged with those crimes.

so if he wasn't charged with a crime, how does one find one guilty of nothing?

 

[Catsnmeters]

doesn't answer post 308

Sure it does.

Do you think predicate crimes are unique?

They are used extensively in law.

You should read up on it.

 

[Catsnmeters]

that's not a felony only a misdemeanor and it was past statute of limitations. oops

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

BTW, you can post that fking falsifying shit until your teeth fall out, doesn't change it as a misdemeanor.

It says class E felony in the law. ROFL.

 

[Catsnmeters]

so if he wasn't charged with a crime, how does one find one guilty of nothing?

He was charged with falsifying business records in the first degree and subsequently found guilty of it.

That isn't nothing.

 

[jc456]

Sure it does.

Do you think predicate crimes are unique?

They are used extensively in law.

You should read up on it.

And you can grow corn on asphalt

 

[jc456]

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.


It says class E felony in the law. ROFL.

Misdemeanor

 

[jc456]

He was charged with falsifying business records in the first degree and subsequently found guilty of it.

That isn't nothing.

Misdemeanor

 

[Catsnmeters]

And you can grow corn on asphalt

I can't explain all this to you in such a short time but I will point you in the right direction to get you started.

Here is one of the precedents used to validate the use of predicate crimes.

People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21 | Casetext Search + Citator

Read People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

casetext.com

We also reject defendant's contention that a separate crime automatically becomes a material element of falsifying business records in the first degree whenever the People rely on the "intent to conceal" prong of that statute on the theory that concealment, as opposed to an intent to commit another crime or aid in the commission thereof, presupposes a prior completed crime. Read as a whole, it is clear that falsifying business records in the second degree is elevated to a first-degree offense on the basis of an enhanced intent requirement — "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof" — not any additional actus reus element.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Misdemeanor

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in the law?

It states it's a felony.

 

[jc456]

I can't explain all this to you in such a short time but I will point you in the right direction to get you started.

Here is one of the precedents used to validate the use of predicate crimes.

People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21 | Casetext Search + Citator

Read People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

casetext.com

We also reject defendant's contention that a separate crime automatically becomes a material element of falsifying business records in the first degree whenever the People rely on the "intent to conceal" prong of that statute on the theory that concealment, as opposed to an intent to commit another crime or aid in the commission thereof, presupposes a prior completed crime. Read as a whole, it is clear that falsifying business records in the second degree is elevated to a first-degree offense on the basis of an enhanced intent requirement — "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof" — not any additional actus reus element.

Dude, it was unprecedented

 

[jc456]

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in the law?

It states it's a felony.

Except the Yale lawyer told you it’s not

 

[Catsnmeters]

Dude, it was unprecedented

Dude, that is the precedent.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Except the Yale lawyer told you it’s not

The Yale lawyer that didn't even know what the charges were? Lol.

 

[jc456]

Dude, that is the precedent.

See, conman can con some but not all and you failed

 

[jc456]

The Yale lawyer that didn't even know what the charges were? Lol.

Like you don’t, or anyone including the jury

 

[Catsnmeters]

See, conman can con some but not all and you failed

Ahh, so the precedent is a con. Lol.

Wow. The right wing media and paid shills have a done a number on you.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Like you don’t, or anyone including the jury

I already showed the the charges.

This is what it's like to debate you...

In this scene I am playing the part of Elaine and you are Kramer.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DwcFZIj96LwY&ved=2ahUKEwi2kO3a3veGAxWCFTQIHbKVCR4Qo7QBegQIDBAG&usg=AOvVaw088mFrkfrGn6w3NUCPQ9ZH

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.


It says class E felony in the law. ROFL.

When was his intention to commit another crime proven?

 

[Catsnmeters]

When was his intention to commit another crime proven?

Here.

https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/People-v-DonaldTrump2-15-24Decision.pdf

Where is the link that shows juries have to agree on the predicate crimes.