What The F**k Has Obama Done So Far

[LoneLaugher]

At last, a handy device to answer the burning question and list his endless failures.

What the **** has Obama done so far

Crazy how one party can vote down everything someone tries to do.

Then says that person is the root cause of everything wrong with this Country.

Then ask it's followers, "What did Obama do"

Great Stance Right Wing.

(I don't want to make fun of you fools but you have to get smarter than this idiocracy)

Click on the link, genius. Learn who is who around here b

 

[idb]

At last, a handy device to answer the burning question and list his endless failures.

What the **** has Obama done so far

Crazy how one party can vote down everything someone tries to do.

Then says that person is the root cause of everything wrong with this Country.

Then ask it's followers, "What did Obama do"

Great Stance Right Wing.

(I don't want to make fun of you fools but you have to get smarter than this idiocracy)

Omigaaaawwwd, right?
That is, like, sooo true!

 

[protectionist]

Crazy how one party can vote down everything someone tries to do.

Then says that person is the root cause of everything wrong with this Country.

Then ask it's followers, "What did Obama do"

Great Stance Right Wing.

(I don't want to make fun of you fools but you have to get smarter than this idiocracy)

Voting bad things down is just as important as voting for god things. Sometimes more important.

 

[protectionist]

Sure I did, is it there to depress or impress?

HA HA HA! Well said. Some of the stuff mentioned in the link are good things, but also are what is EXPECTED of a president to do, if he is doing his job, as he is paid to do. Some of it is downright bad stuff.

 

[Snouter]

I clicked on the link and managed to get through 5 or 6 "accomplishments" and they were all Obamacare related as if Obamacare was a success.

 

[Mac1958]

Whether one likes it or not, under his administration America has clearly begun the "fundamental change" he so boldly promised.

Seems to me that's one helluva lot.
.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Whether one likes it or not, under his administration America has clearly begun the "fundamental change" he so boldly promised.

Seems to me that's one helluva lot.
.

So what were the big changes?

 

[Mac1958]

Whether one likes it or not, under his administration America has clearly begun the "fundamental change" he so boldly promised. Seems to me that's one helluva lot..

So what were the big changes?

You haven't noticed massive changes at the very fundamental levels of our society and culture?

• "You didn't build that", "You didn't earn that" - The growing opinion that people who are successful got there less through hard work and sacrifice than by what others did for them along the way
• Bernie Sanders- and Elizabeth Warren-inspired disdain for our economic and banking systems
• The new boldness of the American Left to not only discuss socialism at all levels, but aggressively defend and advocate for it
• Gay rights victories
• Transgender advances, and a seemingly infinite number of personal gender identity designations - the very core of human existence
  
• The rapidly increasing intolerance for freedom of expression, particularly on college campuses but also at employers
• Ever-increasing reliance on and priority for "identity" on any number of different levels

That's just off the top of my head. All of the above have clearly accelerated during Obama's administration. These are not just laws - a law can be changed or repealed overnight - these are fundamental changes within our culture and society.

You don't see these?
.

 

[FJO]

On the plus side, He has fixed it so no other black man will be elected president for at least 150 years.

That just about jives with :LBJ's prediction about the blacks (he used a more offensive word) voting Democrat for the next 200 years, fifty+ years ago.

It took and always will take a majority of misguided whites to elect a black person to be president. Or anything.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Whether one likes it or not, under his administration America has clearly begun the "fundamental change" he so boldly promised. Seems to me that's one helluva lot..

So what were the big changes?

You haven't noticed massive changes at the very fundamental levels of our society and culture?

• "You didn't build that", "You didn't earn that" - The growing opinion that people who are successful got there less through hard work and sacrifice than by what others did for them along the way
• Bernie Sanders- and Elizabeth Warren-inspired disdain for our economic and banking systems
• The new boldness of the American Left to not only discuss socialism at all levels, but aggressively defend and advocate for it
• Gay rights victories
• Transgender advances, and a seemingly infinite number of personal gender identity designations - the very core of human existence
  
• The rapidly increasing intolerance for freedom of expression, particularly on college campuses but also at employers
• Ever-increasing reliance on and priority for "identity" on any number of different levels

That's just off the top of my head. All of the above have clearly accelerated during Obama's administration. These are not just laws - a law can be changed or repealed overnight - these are fundamental changes within our culture and society.

You don't see these?
.

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

 

[Mac1958]

Whether one likes it or not, under his administration America has clearly begun the "fundamental change" he so boldly promised. Seems to me that's one helluva lot..

So what were the big changes?

You haven't noticed massive changes at the very fundamental levels of our society and culture?

• "You didn't build that", "You didn't earn that" - The growing opinion that people who are successful got there less through hard work and sacrifice than by what others did for them along the way
• Bernie Sanders- and Elizabeth Warren-inspired disdain for our economic and banking systems
• The new boldness of the American Left to not only discuss socialism at all levels, but aggressively defend and advocate for it
• Gay rights victories
• Transgender advances, and a seemingly infinite number of personal gender identity designations - the very core of human existence
  
• The rapidly increasing intolerance for freedom of expression, particularly on college campuses but also at employers
• Ever-increasing reliance on and priority for "identity" on any number of different levels

That's just off the top of my head. All of the above have clearly accelerated during Obama's administration. These are not just laws - a law can be changed or repealed overnight - these are fundamental changes within our culture and society.

You don't see these?
.

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Whether one likes it or not, under his administration America has clearly begun the "fundamental change" he so boldly promised. Seems to me that's one helluva lot..

So what were the big changes?

You haven't noticed massive changes at the very fundamental levels of our society and culture?

• "You didn't build that", "You didn't earn that" - The growing opinion that people who are successful got there less through hard work and sacrifice than by what others did for them along the way
• Bernie Sanders- and Elizabeth Warren-inspired disdain for our economic and banking systems
• The new boldness of the American Left to not only discuss socialism at all levels, but aggressively defend and advocate for it
• Gay rights victories
• Transgender advances, and a seemingly infinite number of personal gender identity designations - the very core of human existence
  
• The rapidly increasing intolerance for freedom of expression, particularly on college campuses but also at employers
• Ever-increasing reliance on and priority for "identity" on any number of different levels

That's just off the top of my head. All of the above have clearly accelerated during Obama's administration. These are not just laws - a law can be changed or repealed overnight - these are fundamental changes within our culture and society.

You don't see these?
.

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

I agree that a president can promote change in society to an extant. I think you are giving Obama way too much credit though. You know society moves on despite the president, many could care less who is president. I guess you are saying Obama is the most powerful president ever or something.

 

[Mac1958]

Whether one likes it or not, under his administration America has clearly begun the "fundamental change" he so boldly promised. Seems to me that's one helluva lot..

So what were the big changes?

You haven't noticed massive changes at the very fundamental levels of our society and culture?

• "You didn't build that", "You didn't earn that" - The growing opinion that people who are successful got there less through hard work and sacrifice than by what others did for them along the way
• Bernie Sanders- and Elizabeth Warren-inspired disdain for our economic and banking systems
• The new boldness of the American Left to not only discuss socialism at all levels, but aggressively defend and advocate for it
• Gay rights victories
• Transgender advances, and a seemingly infinite number of personal gender identity designations - the very core of human existence
  
• The rapidly increasing intolerance for freedom of expression, particularly on college campuses but also at employers
• Ever-increasing reliance on and priority for "identity" on any number of different levels

That's just off the top of my head. All of the above have clearly accelerated during Obama's administration. These are not just laws - a law can be changed or repealed overnight - these are fundamental changes within our culture and society.

You don't see these?
.

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

I agree that a president can promote change in society to an extant. I think you are giving Obama way too much credit though. You know society moves on despite the president, many could care less who is president. I guess you are saying Obama is the most powerful president ever or something.

It appears I can't get you to actually read my posts. I said:

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.

In other words, he probably has something to do with the changes, a President can set a tone. I came nowhere near saying "Obama is the most powerful president ever or something". Reagan set the tone in the 80's, for example.

The fact remains that Obama promised "fundamental change", and that's precisely what we're seeing. If you think it's just a coincidence, great.
.
.

 

[WheelieAddict]

So what were the big changes?

You haven't noticed massive changes at the very fundamental levels of our society and culture?

• "You didn't build that", "You didn't earn that" - The growing opinion that people who are successful got there less through hard work and sacrifice than by what others did for them along the way
• Bernie Sanders- and Elizabeth Warren-inspired disdain for our economic and banking systems
• The new boldness of the American Left to not only discuss socialism at all levels, but aggressively defend and advocate for it
• Gay rights victories
• Transgender advances, and a seemingly infinite number of personal gender identity designations - the very core of human existence
  
• The rapidly increasing intolerance for freedom of expression, particularly on college campuses but also at employers
• Ever-increasing reliance on and priority for "identity" on any number of different levels

That's just off the top of my head. All of the above have clearly accelerated during Obama's administration. These are not just laws - a law can be changed or repealed overnight - these are fundamental changes within our culture and society.

You don't see these?
.

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

I agree that a president can promote change in society to an extant. I think you are giving Obama way too much credit though. You know society moves on despite the president, many could care less who is president. I guess you are saying Obama is the most powerful president ever or something.

It appears I can't get you to actually read my posts. I said:

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.

In other words, he probably has something to do with the changes, a President can set a tone. I came nowhere near saying "Obama is the most powerful president ever or something". Reagan set the tone in the 80's, for example.

The fact remains that Obama promised "fundamental change", and that's precisely what we're seeing. If you think it's just a coincidence, great.
.
.

Well you don't get to waffle with bs. If you say Obama is responsible for a fundamental change in society then he is one of the most powerful presidents ever.

Or do you mean there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it.

Pick one.

 

[easyt65]

Unlike with Hillary, you can actually find a few things on google.

 

[Mac1958]

You haven't noticed massive changes at the very fundamental levels of our society and culture?

• "You didn't build that", "You didn't earn that" - The growing opinion that people who are successful got there less through hard work and sacrifice than by what others did for them along the way
• Bernie Sanders- and Elizabeth Warren-inspired disdain for our economic and banking systems
• The new boldness of the American Left to not only discuss socialism at all levels, but aggressively defend and advocate for it
• Gay rights victories
• Transgender advances, and a seemingly infinite number of personal gender identity designations - the very core of human existence
  
• The rapidly increasing intolerance for freedom of expression, particularly on college campuses but also at employers
• Ever-increasing reliance on and priority for "identity" on any number of different levels

That's just off the top of my head. All of the above have clearly accelerated during Obama's administration. These are not just laws - a law can be changed or repealed overnight - these are fundamental changes within our culture and society.

You don't see these?
.

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

I agree that a president can promote change in society to an extant. I think you are giving Obama way too much credit though. You know society moves on despite the president, many could care less who is president. I guess you are saying Obama is the most powerful president ever or something.

It appears I can't get you to actually read my posts. I said:

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.

In other words, he probably has something to do with the changes, a President can set a tone. I came nowhere near saying "Obama is the most powerful president ever or something". Reagan set the tone in the 80's, for example.

The fact remains that Obama promised "fundamental change", and that's precisely what we're seeing. If you think it's just a coincidence, great.
.
.

Well you don't get to waffle with bs. If you say Obama is responsible for a fundamental change in society then he is one of the most powerful presidents ever.

Or do you mean there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it.

Pick one.

Based on your simplistic, binary question, I would answer "there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it".
.

 

[WheelieAddict]

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

I agree that a president can promote change in society to an extant. I think you are giving Obama way too much credit though. You know society moves on despite the president, many could care less who is president. I guess you are saying Obama is the most powerful president ever or something.

It appears I can't get you to actually read my posts. I said:

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.

In other words, he probably has something to do with the changes, a President can set a tone. I came nowhere near saying "Obama is the most powerful president ever or something". Reagan set the tone in the 80's, for example.

The fact remains that Obama promised "fundamental change", and that's precisely what we're seeing. If you think it's just a coincidence, great.
.
.

Well you don't get to waffle with bs. If you say Obama is responsible for a fundamental change in society then he is one of the most powerful presidents ever.

Or do you mean there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it.

Pick one.

Based on your simplistic, binary question, I would answer "there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it".
.

So Obama isn't the cause then correct?

 

[Seawytch]

What laws did Obama decree to make these possible; and how is Obama himself responsible for "changes". I don't think you are wrong if you could be more specific we could nail it down and that would help though.

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

I agree that a president can promote change in society to an extant. I think you are giving Obama way too much credit though. You know society moves on despite the president, many could care less who is president. I guess you are saying Obama is the most powerful president ever or something.

It appears I can't get you to actually read my posts. I said:

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.

In other words, he probably has something to do with the changes, a President can set a tone. I came nowhere near saying "Obama is the most powerful president ever or something". Reagan set the tone in the 80's, for example.

The fact remains that Obama promised "fundamental change", and that's precisely what we're seeing. If you think it's just a coincidence, great.
.
.

Well you don't get to waffle with bs. If you say Obama is responsible for a fundamental change in society then he is one of the most powerful presidents ever.

Or do you mean there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it.

Pick one.

Based on your simplistic, binary question, I would answer "there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it".
.

So when you said "under his administration" you didn't mean that?

 

[Mac1958]

As I said, this is not about laws. This is about culture and society. That's where the change is taking place.

Obama can't "decree". But I just listed off examples of attitudes that are clearly changing in our country.

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.
.

I agree that a president can promote change in society to an extant. I think you are giving Obama way too much credit though. You know society moves on despite the president, many could care less who is president. I guess you are saying Obama is the most powerful president ever or something.

It appears I can't get you to actually read my posts. I said:

Is he necessarily "responsible"? Indirectly, at least. A President can certainly promote an environment of change.

Are the changes above just coincidental to the timing of his administration? I guess that's possible, but I don't think so.

In other words, he probably has something to do with the changes, a President can set a tone. I came nowhere near saying "Obama is the most powerful president ever or something". Reagan set the tone in the 80's, for example.

The fact remains that Obama promised "fundamental change", and that's precisely what we're seeing. If you think it's just a coincidence, great.
.
.

Well you don't get to waffle with bs. If you say Obama is responsible for a fundamental change in society then he is one of the most powerful presidents ever.

Or do you mean there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it.

Pick one.

Based on your simplistic, binary question, I would answer "there has been a fundamental change in society and Obama was part of it".
.

So Obama isn't the cause then correct?

Good gawd, make a freaking point.

I just answered your question. I have said the President sets the tone. So in that way, he was a significant part of it.

Make a point. Or don't. This is tedious.
.

 

[francoHFW]

Greatest social reform since FDR, averted 2nd GOP Great Depression, 80 months straight of growth w/o GOP bubble/bust.scandal AGAIN, respect of world again,reform of college loans/pot laws/gay laws etc etc despite mindless GOP obstruction/fear mongering/propaganda/lies.

Of course, you'll never hear anything positive on the bs GOP propaganda/hate machine...