LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,231
- 2,250
gotta love frady cat deniars who cant give evidence that stand up to the facts and evidence and run off when challenged to refute them as you so well demonstrated.
What really happened on 9/11 ?
- Thread starter Moonglow
- Start date
gotta love frady cat deniars who cant give evidence that stand up to the facts and evidence and run off when challenged to refute them as you so well demonstrated.
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,231
- 2,250
yeah those terrorists are the people in the Bush administration.Better question is where have YOU been?
eots
no fly list
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TZ3xRKSnP4]Project For The New American Century-PNAC exposed (full movie) - YouTube[/ame]
Moonglow
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #24
Well it does seem strange that many things go unanswered.
I am not saying that our govt. did it, but it does leave questions in ones mind asto what really happened, and why the buildings collapsed so fast when the buildings had the reputation as being one of these best built.
I am not saying that our govt. did it, but it does leave questions in ones mind asto what really happened, and why the buildings collapsed so fast when the buildings had the reputation as being one of these best built.
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,231
- 2,250
Dont forget to include that the designers of the towers built them in mind to be able to take hits from MULTIPLE airliners and they would remain standing.a fact the trolls like Ghook one of the biggest of them all,always ignore.
whats really funny though is they ignore the facts that no building in the history of mankind had ever collapased due to fire and that when buildings do come down due to fire,they dont collapse at free fall speed,they come down gradually over a period of time and the entire structure doesnt collapse either..
this one troll made me laugh so hard recently on a 9/11 thread.I brought that fact up and he showed me a pic of an INFERIOR building collapsing due to fire but all he did was help prove my case for me because it only PARTIALLY fell.the entire stutcture did not collapse,the structure itself remainded standing.
the user name he went by was I can see the light but he should call himself I CANT SEE THE LIGHT.He was a miserable failure while he was here.the smoking gun on 9/11 that it was an inside job that bombs brought the towers down is bld 7.they cant get around that fact no matter how hard they try and thats because bld 7 was a couple of blocks away from the towers and there were other buildings much closer to the towers including next door neighbors of theirs that were hit by much worse debris than bld 7 was and had far more extensive fires than bld 7 did yet all of those buildings structures remained standing.Trolls like Ghook ignore that little fact EVERY SINGLE TIME.Barry Jenning testimony is something the trolls ignore everytime as well.you might want to watch this if you havent heard his testimony he gave before they killed him off for telling the truth about bombs in the towers.
whats interesting is 9/11 follows the same pattern of the kennedy assassination.witnesses who give conflicting versions of events different than the governments dying in very mysterious deaths.
the proof is in the pudding that it was an inside job.All you got to do is watch this short five minute video.someone would have to be on drugs to still believe the official version after that.
none of the trolls ever even attempt to debunk it because they cant.Its undebunkable.http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...911-conspiracy-theory-in-under-5-minutes.html
something that should be added to that video that the trolls always ignore as well is that the towers and bld 7 were the only buildings that fell that day due to fires and they were all three owned by Larry Silverstein yet none of the other buildings hit by much worse debris with worse fires collapsed that day.
the 9/11 apologists just chunk it up to a concidence of course.you got to love the logic of the coincidence theorists.theres so many bizarre coincidences in 9/11 it amazes me how they are such fools the way the concidence theorists defend them to no end.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Banned
- #26
The size of hole was for a missile not for a Boeing.
THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter
Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.
asile.org
THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter
Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.
asile.org
Rozman
Gold Member
Until someone comes up with some proof that something different happened.
I'm going with what actually happened....
Thank you.
I'm going with what actually happened....
Thank you.
Wyld Kard
Platinum Member
What happened on 9/11 with regards to the WTC Towers? They were brought down with "mini-nukes".
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Cancer at Ground Zero: Toxins Versus Radiation, and Nuking
To recap, a recent study showed 4 cases of multiple myeloma cancer in young ground zero workers. Since multiple myeloma normally occurs in old people, four cases out of this specific population of ground zero workers is a very high rate, not explainable by random chance.
There are really only two plausible explanations for these cases of cancer:
1) toxic chemicals, such as benzene, produced by the burning debris/rubble pile
2) radiation from radionuclides leftover from the nuking of the WTC towers
The critical point here is that cancer is almost certainly due to radiation for the following logic:
a) people have been exposed to toxins such as benzene before, but don't develop cancer for ten to twenty years.
b) the ground zero workers developed these cancers in three to four years.
c) radiation can induce cancer in a short period of time.
Now one could argue that the toxin level at Ground Zero was so extreme that it caused cancer much more rapidly than normal. However, this really doesn't hold up for the following reasons:
i) high levels of toxins getting into someone's system are more likely to cause immediate acute systemic illness-- that should have been noted for these cancer victims if it occurred
ii) there must be many other cases of people being exposed to high levels of aerosol carcinogens, yet there is no clear connection of these toxins and rapid cancer development
iii) people who worked at ground zero for any extended period wore protective breathing equipment, which would have limited toxin exposure but would have done nothing for radiation exposure
Importantly, multiple myeloma is NOT the only suspicious cancer showing up in Ground Zero workers-- there is also
thyroid cancer, which is strongly linked to radiation exposure. There are also many blood cancers showing up in the workers.
Finally, note that even the toxins ultimately can be explained by the nuking. First, the power of the nuclear demolition fragmented and fried interior contents of the towers-- leading to immediate toxin production. Second, the China Syndrome of unextinguishable fires in the WTC rubble is due to the nukes-- and was also the source of toxin production.
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Cancer at Ground Zero: Toxins Versus Radiation, and Nuking
To recap, a recent study showed 4 cases of multiple myeloma cancer in young ground zero workers. Since multiple myeloma normally occurs in old people, four cases out of this specific population of ground zero workers is a very high rate, not explainable by random chance.
There are really only two plausible explanations for these cases of cancer:
1) toxic chemicals, such as benzene, produced by the burning debris/rubble pile
2) radiation from radionuclides leftover from the nuking of the WTC towers
The critical point here is that cancer is almost certainly due to radiation for the following logic:
a) people have been exposed to toxins such as benzene before, but don't develop cancer for ten to twenty years.
b) the ground zero workers developed these cancers in three to four years.
c) radiation can induce cancer in a short period of time.
Now one could argue that the toxin level at Ground Zero was so extreme that it caused cancer much more rapidly than normal. However, this really doesn't hold up for the following reasons:
i) high levels of toxins getting into someone's system are more likely to cause immediate acute systemic illness-- that should have been noted for these cancer victims if it occurred
ii) there must be many other cases of people being exposed to high levels of aerosol carcinogens, yet there is no clear connection of these toxins and rapid cancer development
iii) people who worked at ground zero for any extended period wore protective breathing equipment, which would have limited toxin exposure but would have done nothing for radiation exposure
Importantly, multiple myeloma is NOT the only suspicious cancer showing up in Ground Zero workers-- there is also
thyroid cancer, which is strongly linked to radiation exposure. There are also many blood cancers showing up in the workers.
Finally, note that even the toxins ultimately can be explained by the nuking. First, the power of the nuclear demolition fragmented and fried interior contents of the towers-- leading to immediate toxin production. Second, the China Syndrome of unextinguishable fires in the WTC rubble is due to the nukes-- and was also the source of toxin production.
Rat in the Hat
Gold Member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 21,949
- 6,021
- 198
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0]Billy Madison - Ultimate Insult (Academic Decathlon) - YouTube[/ame]
ERGO
Bursting Bubbles
- Feb 24, 2012
- 354
- 42
- 16
The "official account" of the Pentagon attack is a fantasy!
No identifiable Boeing 757-223 parts were ever found. There were two 6 ton Pratt & Whitney engines that were never found. no seats, no luggage, no landing gear...
Unfortunately, many people in America are unaware that the Washington, D.C. area has Raytheon "Basic Point Defense" missile battery armament embedded on several building rooftops there, using Sea Sparrow air defense missiles, much in the same fashion that Moscow has a system that NATO code named Yo Yo that maintains radar surveillance and provides protection to the Kremlin and other high value targets from military incursions. There is a system, known as "Identification Friend or Foe" aka I.F.F., which uses a special MODE 4A feature that only military aircraft use, whereupon special encryption. Additionally, a mission specific MODEX aka SEDSCAF number for each plane is assigned and if it does not meet the PLAN OF THE DAY for the area, IT STILL IS NOT GOING TO PASS MODE 4A MUSTER. It would be shot down. No "if"s, no "and"s and no "but"s!
The proper MODEX / SEDSCAF NUMBER is what enables an aircraft them to penetrate prohibited or military restricted airspace such as that which surrounds both the White House and the Pentagon, as well as a number of military installations around the globe.
The reason I mention this is that there are several echelons of protection which allegedly all summarily failed us on Sept. 11th., 2001, and allowed an unidentified plane hurtling towards Washington, D.C.s protected airspace, long after the First targets in New York had already been seriously damaged.
So, on September 11, 2001, what took place was a plane that was not a scheduled air carrier flight, per the Bureau of Transportation Statistics or BTS database, departed Dulles International from a departure gate that does not match the coordinates transmitted by FDR data stored in the CPM provided by the N.T.S.B., flight data recorder records, on that non-scheduled American Airlines flight, aka FLT 77 per the governments submission, where this flight allegedly left Dulles with a hijacker on board who was capable of flying a very sophisticated and complex airplane that even the average pilot in the F.A.A. pilot registry could probably not really fly with such precision.
What was more alarming that day is that during the 3 minute hijacking interval, neither the cockpit door opened (reported via the Digital Flight Data Acquisition Unit or DFDAU as it is known as) and the autopilot did not disengage.
The precision turn executed and the immediate orientation onto the course to the Pentagon is kind of indicative of a professional pilot and not a hijacker being at the controls, because the crew who flew that plane knew precisely where the plane was when they turned directly onto a course which would then take them directly into the target, which that morning was the Pentagon. Given the fact that it is quite impossible for these freshly in the cockpit hijackers to know where the plane was when they took it over, and furthermore, to know the exact on course heading back to the Washington, D.C. area to attack the Pentagon, is again quite telling of who really was still at the controls of this plane.
This full article full of factual info can be read at:
JAMES FETZER: The "official account" of the Pentagon attack is a fantasy
Real Pilots Speak Out on September 11th Lies 911
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc3EZMuerWY]Real Pilots Speak Out on September 11th Lies 911 - YouTube[/ame]
No identifiable Boeing 757-223 parts were ever found. There were two 6 ton Pratt & Whitney engines that were never found. no seats, no luggage, no landing gear...
Unfortunately, many people in America are unaware that the Washington, D.C. area has Raytheon "Basic Point Defense" missile battery armament embedded on several building rooftops there, using Sea Sparrow air defense missiles, much in the same fashion that Moscow has a system that NATO code named Yo Yo that maintains radar surveillance and provides protection to the Kremlin and other high value targets from military incursions. There is a system, known as "Identification Friend or Foe" aka I.F.F., which uses a special MODE 4A feature that only military aircraft use, whereupon special encryption. Additionally, a mission specific MODEX aka SEDSCAF number for each plane is assigned and if it does not meet the PLAN OF THE DAY for the area, IT STILL IS NOT GOING TO PASS MODE 4A MUSTER. It would be shot down. No "if"s, no "and"s and no "but"s!
The proper MODEX / SEDSCAF NUMBER is what enables an aircraft them to penetrate prohibited or military restricted airspace such as that which surrounds both the White House and the Pentagon, as well as a number of military installations around the globe.
The reason I mention this is that there are several echelons of protection which allegedly all summarily failed us on Sept. 11th., 2001, and allowed an unidentified plane hurtling towards Washington, D.C.s protected airspace, long after the First targets in New York had already been seriously damaged.
So, on September 11, 2001, what took place was a plane that was not a scheduled air carrier flight, per the Bureau of Transportation Statistics or BTS database, departed Dulles International from a departure gate that does not match the coordinates transmitted by FDR data stored in the CPM provided by the N.T.S.B., flight data recorder records, on that non-scheduled American Airlines flight, aka FLT 77 per the governments submission, where this flight allegedly left Dulles with a hijacker on board who was capable of flying a very sophisticated and complex airplane that even the average pilot in the F.A.A. pilot registry could probably not really fly with such precision.
What was more alarming that day is that during the 3 minute hijacking interval, neither the cockpit door opened (reported via the Digital Flight Data Acquisition Unit or DFDAU as it is known as) and the autopilot did not disengage.
The precision turn executed and the immediate orientation onto the course to the Pentagon is kind of indicative of a professional pilot and not a hijacker being at the controls, because the crew who flew that plane knew precisely where the plane was when they turned directly onto a course which would then take them directly into the target, which that morning was the Pentagon. Given the fact that it is quite impossible for these freshly in the cockpit hijackers to know where the plane was when they took it over, and furthermore, to know the exact on course heading back to the Washington, D.C. area to attack the Pentagon, is again quite telling of who really was still at the controls of this plane.
This full article full of factual info can be read at:
JAMES FETZER: The "official account" of the Pentagon attack is a fantasy
Real Pilots Speak Out on September 11th Lies 911
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc3EZMuerWY]Real Pilots Speak Out on September 11th Lies 911 - YouTube[/ame]
ERGO
Bursting Bubbles
- Feb 24, 2012
- 354
- 42
- 16
The supposed 9/11 hijackers of flight 77 did something puzzling for a crew of neophyte hijackers. On their way down thru Flight Level 180, or 18 thousand feet, they magically, without having listened to the ATIS or automated terminal information service, broadcast from Dulles International Airport that morning, these guys somehow knew the barometric pressure reported on that automated broadcast though no controller passed that information to them, and they set that in the Kollsman window on BOTH of the cockpit altimiters simultaneously.
Machine precision out of hijackers turning two knobs at the same time in perfect, instantaneous fashion, is extremely unlikely for these guys, yet that was exactly what took place when both the hijacker and his co-hijacker buddy, who must have gotten VERY lucky to pick those barometric pressure numbers for DCA that morning out of their asses, because they had no way of knowing them otherwise as no radio in the cockpit was tuned to the ATIS frequency, as that is recorded in the FDR data and not reflected in the data the N.T.S.B. released from that planes Flight Data Recorder.
The supposed hijackers ,again, did something quite unusual. They were able to penetrate that highly protected airspace without the proper MODE 4A military I.F.F. response, and no communications with ATC of any kind, no clearance issued of any kind, and they flew a nice leisurely 330 degree turn after passing right past the White House, the more desirable high value target, than their intended Pentagon target could ever dream to be. After they completed the turn, they managed to accelerate the aircraft well beyond 150 knots faster than it could ever possibly fly at that altitude, even full throttle. They did this without touching the rudder pedals for even one moment after their hijacking of the plane several minutes earlier, too! Needless to say, to perform a coordinated turn as the N.T.S.B. flight data recorder data shows, they would have had to use rudder inputs, but they never touched the aircraft rudders once during their entire time in the cockpit after they slid under the crack below the cockpit door to gain entry. Was this because neither of them had legs? They walked onto the plane and did not require
wheelchairs, so is it not a little strange or odd they never ever once touched the rudder pedals in that plane?
After careful analysis of the flight data recorder stuff provided to us by the N.T.S.B., in their recreation, we see the fact the rudders and the yoke were not moved nor did the autopilot disengage while the crew fought for their very lives in that cockpit. And, at no other time did the rudders ever get so much as a passing foot kick. At the very least, these guys would have probably inadvertently tested them a bit with their feet, yet they never touched them. And to do the nice 330 degree turn into the building, they would have absolutely NEEDED TO USE THE RUDDER to carry this out in what is called COORDINATED FLIGHT without slipping or skidding the plane in three dimensional space that morning.
source link:9/11: The Official Account of the Pentagon Attack is a Fantasy
911 Pentagon Flight Recorder Fraud Revealed - Dennis Cimino
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQenbm-aaEc]911 Pentagon Flight Recorder Fraud Revealed - Dennis Cimino (mirror) - YouTube[/ame]
Machine precision out of hijackers turning two knobs at the same time in perfect, instantaneous fashion, is extremely unlikely for these guys, yet that was exactly what took place when both the hijacker and his co-hijacker buddy, who must have gotten VERY lucky to pick those barometric pressure numbers for DCA that morning out of their asses, because they had no way of knowing them otherwise as no radio in the cockpit was tuned to the ATIS frequency, as that is recorded in the FDR data and not reflected in the data the N.T.S.B. released from that planes Flight Data Recorder.
The supposed hijackers ,again, did something quite unusual. They were able to penetrate that highly protected airspace without the proper MODE 4A military I.F.F. response, and no communications with ATC of any kind, no clearance issued of any kind, and they flew a nice leisurely 330 degree turn after passing right past the White House, the more desirable high value target, than their intended Pentagon target could ever dream to be. After they completed the turn, they managed to accelerate the aircraft well beyond 150 knots faster than it could ever possibly fly at that altitude, even full throttle. They did this without touching the rudder pedals for even one moment after their hijacking of the plane several minutes earlier, too! Needless to say, to perform a coordinated turn as the N.T.S.B. flight data recorder data shows, they would have had to use rudder inputs, but they never touched the aircraft rudders once during their entire time in the cockpit after they slid under the crack below the cockpit door to gain entry. Was this because neither of them had legs? They walked onto the plane and did not require
wheelchairs, so is it not a little strange or odd they never ever once touched the rudder pedals in that plane?
After careful analysis of the flight data recorder stuff provided to us by the N.T.S.B., in their recreation, we see the fact the rudders and the yoke were not moved nor did the autopilot disengage while the crew fought for their very lives in that cockpit. And, at no other time did the rudders ever get so much as a passing foot kick. At the very least, these guys would have probably inadvertently tested them a bit with their feet, yet they never touched them. And to do the nice 330 degree turn into the building, they would have absolutely NEEDED TO USE THE RUDDER to carry this out in what is called COORDINATED FLIGHT without slipping or skidding the plane in three dimensional space that morning.
source link:9/11: The Official Account of the Pentagon Attack is a Fantasy
911 Pentagon Flight Recorder Fraud Revealed - Dennis Cimino
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQenbm-aaEc]911 Pentagon Flight Recorder Fraud Revealed - Dennis Cimino (mirror) - YouTube[/ame]
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,231
- 2,250
Dawgshit just got his ass handed to him on a platter like he constantly does everyday.He can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey troll he is.
these are facts dawgshit cant answer or get around.
http://www.rmbowman.com/ssn/Secrecy.htm
these are facts dawgshit cant answer or get around.
http://www.rmbowman.com/ssn/Secrecy.htm
Last edited:
Wyld Kard
Platinum Member
What happened...
<snip>
Wyld Kard
Platinum Member
35 Reasons Micro-Nukes Were Utilized to Demolish the WTC Cores on 9/11
Editors Note: Micro-Nukes were likely used at the base core in conduction with nano-thermite and C4. Multiple demolitions were used.
Here are the reasons:
1.Heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
2.Inability to quench ground zero heat with water
3.Red hot/molten steel at ground zero
4.Missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
5.Spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation
6.Washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination
7.Extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel
8.Extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
9.Extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
10.Disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
11.Disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris
12.Disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris
13.Several floor fragments fused together in meteorite object
14.Bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction
15.Multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
16.Large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
17.Small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
18.Fission-nuke technology well-established
19.Low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome
20.EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning)
21.Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
22.Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
23.High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
24.Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
25.Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro
26.Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps
27.Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface
28.Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath
29.Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs
30.Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
31.Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
32.Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
33.Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test
34.Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
35.Extremely compacted ground zero debris
Editors Note: Micro-Nukes were likely used at the base core in conduction with nano-thermite and C4. Multiple demolitions were used.
Here are the reasons:
1.Heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
2.Inability to quench ground zero heat with water
3.Red hot/molten steel at ground zero
4.Missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
5.Spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation
6.Washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination
7.Extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel
8.Extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
9.Extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
10.Disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
11.Disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris
12.Disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris
13.Several floor fragments fused together in meteorite object
14.Bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction
15.Multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
16.Large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
17.Small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
18.Fission-nuke technology well-established
19.Low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome
20.EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning)
21.Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
22.Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
23.High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
24.Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
25.Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro
26.Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps
27.Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface
28.Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath
29.Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs
30.Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
31.Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
32.Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
33.Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test
34.Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
35.Extremely compacted ground zero debris
Wyld Kard
Platinum Member
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM3bHgTBxGo]911: Craters M-Nukes left in the WTC site - YouTube[/ame]
Wyld Kard
Platinum Member
Samuel Danner, an experienced pilot from Maryland, says he witnessed the attack on the Pentagon from less than 500 feet. Danner said the aircraft in question was not a Boeing 757 but a very quiet-flying drone-like aircraft without any cockpit or fuselage windows. Private investigators believe the Pentagon was hit by a DU - weaponized remote controlled Global Hawk. Radiation levels were 10 times over normal around the Pentagon. No bodies of passengers were found at the scene.
Global Hawks are extremly light weight about 4 tons and more than 50% is carbon fiber and resin. That would explain why there was less than 2 tons of scrap!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1aBFbyN7xY]9/11 CONSPIRACY: Did the Global Hawk drones use Uranium? - YouTube[/ame]
Global Hawks are extremly light weight about 4 tons and more than 50% is carbon fiber and resin. That would explain why there was less than 2 tons of scrap!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1aBFbyN7xY]9/11 CONSPIRACY: Did the Global Hawk drones use Uranium? - YouTube[/ame]
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Cultural aproporiation vs Cultural Integration: thoughts and opinions?- Started by Mortimer
- Replies: 0
-
-
Food you have never tried but wonder if you might have missed something- Started by Tommy Tainant
- Replies: 0
-
