Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 28,183
- 20,546
- 2,415
Sorry, no Nobels allowed in prison.He needs another Nobel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, no Nobels allowed in prison.He needs another Nobel.
That is a solid fact.Trump had a chance to make a case to go after Obama 8 years ago.
Now all Trump is doing is trying to distract from the Epstein file sword of Damocles.
First, it’s Obama.If these actions happen when Osama was President Trump can't do anything per Supreme Court.
I'm not sure. Undermining our elections, working to throw an election and to undermine a president running for office using the power of the government to criminalize a person so that you could install a puppet who you controlled for an unofficial (and illegal) third term, sounds like treason to me.
I think we need to throw the book at Obumma then let him prove, lawyer, and fight his way out of it.
If Trump doesn't cause Obumma to spend at least 500 million dollars defending himself, he has failed his job.
Trump says they have Barack dead to rights with his signature on documents. Looks like the Trump DOJ could be going all in whole hog on a Barack Obama prosecution for treason, along with many other individuals, but Trump has essentially named Obama as the principle target and ring leader.
Question is: assuming Obama is found guilty of sedition, treason, or collusion to upset and steal an election, what should the punishment be? Pick 1-2 choices.
Presidential duties don't include subversion of the Constitution.Good thing Trump got the USSC to rule that any acts done within the constitutional authority of the president is covered by presidential immunity.

The Supreme Court held that under the constitutional structure of separated powers, a former president is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken within his “conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.” Moreover, he is also entitled to presumptive immunity for all other official acts, because not all official acts fall within the “conclusive and preclusive authority” of the president. In such instances, the burden falls upon the government to prove that criminal prohibition of such acts “would pose no dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”First, it’s Obama.
Second, you’re mistaken. If Obama’s criminal actions were outside the bounds of his Presidential duties, they aren’t covered by the SCOTUS ruling. Indeed, those acts would be in their face excluded. Read the decision.
You mean like Trump using the Justice Department for fraudulent purposes?First, it’s Obama.
Second, you’re mistaken. If Obama’s criminal actions were outside the bounds of his Presidential duties
When? In between his two impeachments or while he was busy firing Comey for being a louse? Or maybe while the G. Floyd riots and Covid were all going on.Trump had a chance to make a case to go after Obama 8 years ago.
Too funny! Distract from stuff the other party had for ages that they never used against Trump because there is nothing in it???Now all Trump is doing is trying to distract from the Epstein file sword of Damocles.
Making that bullshit claim isn’t a fact. Learn the difference, you idiot.You mean like Trump using the Justice Department for fraudulent purposes?
No. That’s not what he did, dumbass. And whether Russia actually did anything to assist Trump was a simpleton allegations not a fact.Obama ordered an investigation into election interference by Russia, which did in fact occur.
He didn’t commit any crimes, you retard.Not even in the same ballpark as Trump's actual crimes.
Not a try. Just discussing a topic with which you are unfamiliar or against which you are hostile: reality and truth.Nice try.
Yeah sure. That’s the Dim and libturds claim. But it’s nonsense. As you know.This is Trump trying to distract your cult from the Epstein scandal.
Again, you making that claim and it being true are worlds apart.He can't even manage to come up with anything fresh! Same old, stale bullshit that didn't fly the first time around.
No. It’s beyond honest doubt that he’s not the desperate one. But we know who is: shitbags like ex-President Obumbler and his fellow co-conspirators.He's desperate. Obviously.
I'm not voting purely because this poll strikes me more as a fantasy
Life in prison.
Walk and chew gum at the same time.When? In between his two impeachments or while he was busy firing Comey for being a louse? Or maybe while the G. Floyd riots and Covid were all going on.
Until then, Trump is just trying to distract from the Epstein issue.Like you always say, maybe the constitution is just out of date and needs updated?
All three. At once.Life in prison is a polling choice! Why don't you select it above?
I'll meet you halfway:
- Life in prison for Obumma
- At Alligator Alcatraz
- With alligator and python meat three times a day as meals.
The one Pam Bondi lied overWhat Epstein issue is that?