The latest numbers are dramatically higher than those in the Institute of Medicine's 1999 report,To Err is Human: Building A Safer Health System,
which estimated that up to 98,000 people a year die because of hospital mistakes.
Hospital medical errors now the third leading cause of death in the U.S.
NOT DOCTORS you idiot!
READ CAREFULLY!
And not all Malpractice suits are against Doctors, they are against hospitals, usually.
What you guys want is to take away the people who are killed and maimed by the medical industry to be able to get compensation for their losses.
Even though there is no evidence that will improve health care (It will probably make it worse) or bring down costs (Texas did exactly what you suggest and costs INCREASED).
Once again your OPINION is totally whacked and WRONG as I can confidently say because YOU spout off something you made up and obviously unlike me you never
use links to substantiate your unsupported opinion.
You said not all suits are against doctors and now you are say mostly against hospitals?
So when the doctors tell you they are practicing defensive medicine you think they are trying to protect hospitals???
Why Settle?
Over 90% of medical malpractice cases settle out of court, and for good reason. Neither side wants to go to court, because it is expensive and time-consuming. Generally, only those cases where neither side can agree on a settlement amount will go to trial, and even then it is usually a last option.
Settlement Amounts vs. Jury Awards
The average out of court settlement for a medical malpractice lawsuit is just over $425,000, while the average jury award is now over $1 Million. So why not go to trial every time?The fact is that medical malpractice litigation is very expensive, time consuming and not guaranteed.
If an attorney passes on a settlement offer only to find that a detail in the case may jeopardize its success, then both that attorney and their client loses.
Length and Process of a Medical Malpractice Suit | Lawfirms.com
$500,000 Awarded to Patient for Doctor's Defamatory Remarks During Surgery
Washington, DC: An unidentified patient in Virginia has been awarded $500,000 by a jury hearing his
medical malpractice lawsuit which claims his anesthesiologist made defamatory comments while he was under sedation for a colonoscopy. The award includes $200,000 in punitive damages.
The unidentified plaintiff, referred to as DB, had left his smart phone on record so he could ensure he got his doctor’s post surgical instructions, according to the
Washington Post. However, during the procedure his trousers were placed under him, which resulted in the inadvertent recording, court papers indicate.
When DB listened to the recording on his way home from the surgery, he discovered Dr. Tiffany Ingham mocking and disparaging him. Among the comments was a referral to a rash on the plaintiff’s penis, which Ingham incorrectly suggested indicated syphilis and tuberculosis. (The jury awarded $50,000 in compensatory damages for defamation for the doctor’s remarks about each of these diseases, and another $200,000 for overall medical malpractice.) Ingham also allegedly said she was going to note in the man’s chart that he had hemorrhoids, which he didn’t.
DB also sued a gastroenterologist, Soloman Shah, who, while present for the procedure, did not directly participate in most of the commentary by Ingham. That portion of the case was dismissed.
$500,000 Awarded to Patient for Doctor's Defamatory Remarks During Surgery
With this kind of legal activities NOW is there any wonder $850 billion a year in wasted duplicate defensive medicine practices are paid?