What Noem said that caused Padilla to ask a question.

I'll the same Democrat mofos complaining about Bobert and Greene lacking decorum while Obama was speaking are the same ones making excuse for this POS senator.
The situations are not in any way comparable. These endless deflections away from the security agent's excessive, uncalled for use of force in dealing with a US senator are not aging well.
 
"We are staying here to liberate [LA] from the socialists and the burdensome leadership this governor and mayor have placed on this country and this city."

YOu guys know that's the very definition of a coup, right?

Why is no one talking about this?

 
So, when the people you elect fail to protect you from crime and in fact, they support the crimes being committed against you, then when another authority steps in and stops the criminal activity, they have, in fact, liberated you from your own stupidity.
 
"We are staying here to liberate [LA] from the socialists and the burdensome leadership this governor and mayor have placed on this country and this city."

YOu guys know that's the very definition of a coup, right?

Why is no one talking about this?


This won’t go well for you, Simp.:auiqs.jpg:
 
Why is no one talking about this?
 
The Overton window has been pushed to the far right in America for decades now OP.

The frog doesn't know it's being cooked.
How? In the 90s, even the Democrats were against illegal immigration. Now, the Dems actively support mass amnesty while the GOP gives lip service to border security while still hiring illegals. That's much further left than it used to be.

In the 00s, everyone knew what a woman was. A guy pretending to be a woman was rightfully seen as mentally ill. Today, you can get fired for stating the obvious truth on that.

Socially, we've swung far left on most social issues. The West overall has. With any luck, there might be some shifting back to the right now, but since the left still maintains control of academia and most of the media, it's slow going.
 
"We are staying here to liberate [LA] from the socialists and the burdensome leadership this governor and mayor have placed on this country and this city."

YOu guys know that's the very definition of a coup, right?

Why is no one talking about this?



I was shocked by her comments and have said so repeatedly in my posts. All of which are dubbed "Fake News", by the **** bois and Cultists here.

Of course the Cult is so busy celebrating Trump's ongoing insurrection and the march to a fascist dicatorship, they keep forgetting that it hasn't happened yet, and it's not looking good for Trump at this point.

Today's murder of Democrats in Minnesota is certainly starting Trump's birthday off with a bang. Shit's about to get real, and once this thing gets started, people will turn on Trump so fast it will make you head spin.
 
It won't go well for anyone.

How do we get you to understand that fascism is bad?
It's not fascism. You love to use that word though. I do kind of wish Trump took the opposite approach, however. Let LA burn. The best thing that could happen to the US is if we ousted California and let them be their own country. Given the debt and social problems they have, they are a net drain on the US. Also, California leaving the US would make the Electoral College vote far more favorable for the GOP.
 
Noem makes sense. Why isn't the media questioning what the hell Padilla was on when he acted like a fool? Was he drunk?
 
I was shocked by her comments and have said so repeatedly in my posts. All of which are dubbed "Fake News", by the **** bois and Cultists here.

Of course the Cult is so busy celebrating Trump's ongoing insurrection and the march to a fascist dicatorship, they keep forgetting that it hasn't happened yet, and it's not looking good for Trump at this point.

Today's murder of Democrats in Minnesota is certainly starting Trump's birthday off with a bang. Shit's about to get real, and once this thing gets started, people will turn on Trump so fast it will make you head spin.
Prove your claims, liar.

GO!
 
15th post
How? In the 90s, even the Democrats were against illegal immigration. Now, the Dems actively support mass amnesty while the GOP gives lip service to border security while still hiring illegals. That's much further left than it used to be.

In the 00s, everyone knew what a woman was. A guy pretending to be a woman was rightfully seen as mentally ill. Today, you can get fired for stating the obvious truth on that.

Socially, we've swung far left on most social issues. The West overall has. With any luck, there might be some shifting back to the right now, but since the left still maintains control of academia and most of the media, it's slow going.

Dems are NOT supporting illegal immigration, but they are being realistic in their solutions, while Republicans like the status quo and refuse to change it.

You cannot deport 10 million people. It's not physically possible, and it's certainly not good economics to do so. You can deport 400,000 people per year - realistically.

Trump's illegal and ill advised attempts to increase that number, have caused widespread chaos throughout the nation and resulted in FEWER deportations than the Democrats did, while blowing the entire ICE budget in just a few month.

Instead of locking up immigrants, Democrats arrest their employers and charge them. The fines levied pay for the investigation and prosecution, and when these companies are under compliance orders, they're monitored by ICE to ensure that they're not hiring illegals. When companies stop hiring, illegal border crossings drop like a stone. Democrats reduce illegal border crossings and the fines collected from employers pays for the border enforcement. WIN/WIN for the nation.

Republicans refuse to prosecute employers so as soon as Republican is in office, Tyson and Koch put out word "now hiring illegals" and they come running. Republicans get to claim Democrats favour "open borders" and they get to make a big show of mass arrests and deportations, but the numbers of undocument workers continue to rise.

Stop blaming Democrats for your problem with illegals. Republicans have refused to change immigration laws since 1987, because this shit is working for them.
 
How? In the 90s, even the Democrats were against illegal immigration. Now, the Dems actively support mass amnesty while the GOP gives lip service to border security while still hiring illegals. That's much further left than it used to be.

In the 00s, everyone knew what a woman was. A guy pretending to be a woman was rightfully seen as mentally ill. Today, you can get fired for stating the obvious truth on that.

Socially, we've swung far left on most social issues. The West overall has. With any luck, there might be some shifting back to the right now, but since the left still maintains control of academia and most of the media, it's slow going.
Ronnie Reagan gave us the biggest amnesty in history yet you people always seem to conveniently ignore this fact.

Stop the nonsense.
 
When K.L. Noem speaks, no one listens.

When Noem speaks it's like a tree falling in the woods.
 
Back
Top Bottom