What Noem said that caused Padilla to ask a question.

When Noem drives past the SPCA the dogs play dead
1749923726790.webp
 
When K.L. Noem speaks, no one listens.

When Noem speaks it's like a tree falling in the woods.

Is it when a drunk senator gets rowdy?

This is how the right's spin evolves. Now that the lies that he didn't identify himself, and that he "attacked" the Secretary or "charged" the podium have been completely debunked, you're going to attempt to claim that the Senator was drunk at an early morning press conference in Los Angeles.

Every time you get caught lying, you come back with another lie. You people seem to think that everyone is as gullible as YOU clearly are.
 

Kristi Noem says the feds are coming to ‘liberate’ Los Angeles​

“We are not going away,” she warned. “We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.”

“I’m Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary. Because the fact of the matter is ...” the senator said before being violently detained. “Hands off!”
When she says “we” are going to “liberate” Los Angeles from the “socialists” and the “burdensome leadership” of the governor and the mayor, is she merely talking about continuing with ICE’s sadistic, haphazard raids in which undocumented immigrants with no criminal records, including women and children, and even legal immigrants and U.S. citizens have been ensnared in the name of protecting the homeland from a fictitious foreign invasion of terrorists and hardened gang members? Or is the secretary speaking more literally and indicating the Trump administration intends to remove — or otherwise render moot — democratically elected state and local officials who oppose the federal government’s brutal incursion into their jurisdictions?


The residents of the LA area can no longer choose their leadership? The regime has decided to liberate them from their elected officials? Justifying it by labeling them "socialists?" You know what that sounds like, right?

Who "asks a question" by rushing the podium and screaming violent threats?
 
Sure. Reagan is definitely overrated overall. I think the last great president we had was Eisenhower. It's been kind of depressing since then.

Eisenhauer made his share of mistakes too. None of these guys gets everything right, but I would say that most of them tried. Nixon would be the big exception.

As a student of history, in the early days of the Roman Republic, Rome was ruled by the elites - the oldest and wealthiest families of Rome. These families owed their wealth and power to the City, and repaid that debt by serving the people of Rome in the Senate, and as taking their turns as Consul. There were two Consuls - one who managed the City of Rome, and the Senate, and the other who lead the Roman army in wars of conquest.

Eventually, men began to seek to be Consuls for the power, as well as the financial opportunities. The notion of service to the City faded, Ultimately, the Republic died. Julius Cesaer was the last true Consul. Upon his assassination, his nephew Augustus became the first Emperor of Rome.

The USA is not Rome. But the parallels are obvious. People are now seeking the presidency for the money and the power, not to serve the people. What is happening now, is that Trump is trying to declare himself Dictator for Life. It's not about serving the people. It's about his money and his power.
 
This is how the right's spin evolves. Now that the lies that he didn't identify himself, and that he "attacked" the Secretary or "charged" the podium have been completely debunked, you're going to attempt to claim that the Senator was drunk at an early morning press conference in Los Angeles.

Every time you get caught lying, you come back with another lie. You people seem to think that everyone is as gullible as YOU clearly are.

Where was it debunked?
 
Back
Top Bottom