Ah, yes, Good Ol' Niemoller.Yes and No.If things get bad enough, the Federal government re-classifies Islam as a Political System rather than a Religion, thereby stripping it of its Constitutional protection.Throughout history, nations have oftentimes ejected religious sects from their country, owing to incompatibility or undesirability or danger - real or perceived.
For example, several Muslim-dominated nations ejected all their Jews, within Living Memory, in the period 1948-1973.
It's what happens when an alien and hostile religious sect starts killing children.
When Constitutionality and Safety are at-odds, Safety usually wins.
We aren't those countries.
And what you are proposing is outright unconstitutional.
All strictly in-line with the Constitution and successive statute.
After that, it's Open Season.
The beneficiaries of your persistent advocacy need to come to the realization that such a thing is possible here.
While there is still time to save their position here.
Otherwise, there will come a time in the not-too-distant future, where your beneficiaries are going to have that smug arrogance wiped off their faces.
Chilling, isn't it?
Chilling, because of the very real prospect of such a thing happening here, if your boys don't get their heads out of their asses, sooner rather than later.
Tick... tick... tick...
I think you are yanking my chain....
I hope-to-Christ that it doesn't come to that.
But in the present climate, it could.
We need look no further than the Populist-Rightist movements in England, France, Germany and the United States, as well as other Western Countries, to see this developing.
The sad truth is, that Islam is, in the main, and in the long term, incompatible with Christendom, including a half-secularized Europe and much of the New World.
An even sadder truth is that there is very little Reciprocity in accommodating Christianity and Judaism, within the lands of Islam.
Why is it OK for them to dominate, and in many cases, repress, Christians and Jews and Buddhists and Sikhs, etc., yet they must be accommodated, outside their lands, within the domains of Christian and Jewish belief?
That is a recipe for Cultural Suicide.
No thank you.
Every time that Islamists blow up groups of little children within the domains of Christendom, they put another nail in the coffin of Islamic accommodation in The West.
How much longer do you think you have, before Christian (secularized, or otherwise) Nations begin crafting modern-day Edicts of Expulsion, and to hell with obstructive law?
Keep blowing-up little children and you're likely to find out, sooner rather than later, by the look of it.
Don't think that's possible?
Ask the poor Japanese-Americans of 1941-1945 --- in extremis, even Americans are capable of setting aside Constitutional concerns, in order to neutralize a perceived threat.
When Constitutionality and Safety at at odds, Safety oftentimes wins.
My earlier narrative merely articulates the Legal Means by which such Edicts and other actions might actually manifest in the Real World, if things get bad enough.
I show you one possible future - entirely realistic, if the beneficiaries of your advocacy don't get themselves under control, and that damned quickly.
Salaam.
It's interesting to see people actually support this kind of extremism.
The taking of innocent people, stripping them of their rights and citizenship, and sending them to live in barbaric countries that they either have never lived in, having grown up as American as you or I, or that they or their ancestors had escaped persecution from.
You advocate something that is every bit as barbaric as what you criticize some of these other countries for.
The beneficiciaries of my advocacy are Americans. American citizens protected under our constitution. I don't care what their religion is or their skin color or their ethnic background.
What you - and others - advocate, I would fight against with every breath. It is wrong, It is unAmerican - and because we made that horrible mistake with the Japanese in the past doesn't mean we should, could or will again.
Niemoller's words are timeless:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Yep.
Nasty business.
Do your pals want a piece of that?:
Doubt it.
There's still probably time for them to get their heads out of their arses.
I doubt they'll manage it, though.
And, bombing after bombing, shooting after shooting, micro-jihad after micro-jihad... eventually, you hit the end of the goodwill and patience of the dominant population.
And then the $hit hits the fan.
At that point, we're looking at a modern-day Edict of Expulsion, with Muslims being forced to leave, rather than Jews.
In extremis, or widespread panic or mortal disgust, the mechanics behind the ejection, and the law, become less important than simply getting rid of the goddamned threat forever.
Like I said earlier... ask the West Coast Japanese-Americans of 1941-1945, to learn if such things are possible here.
And, folks care far less about ignorant, hostile Muzzies than they did the far more civilized and industrious and likable Japanese.
Think about that, too.
And, isn't it amazing, how so many Lefties will defend Islam against their own kind?
Assuming that's what you are... one of "us".
Last edited: