What legal standing does Barr have to NOT release Mueller's report to Congress?

[candycorn]

And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Wait... you're critical of The Obama administration?

Sure.

Not that Obama deserves criticism on this matter

 

[Faun]

When will congressional Democrats start doing their job? All this investigating is preventing them from addressing our border crisis. Monkey see monkey do Democrats are obsessed with Medicare for all, the green energy act and identity and race politics, all of which will be fatal to our country. The bottom line is they hate Trump and will do anything to prevent his reelection. In the meantime, I got $3500 more in my income tax return. How about those crumbs, Nancy? Thank you President Trump. I think I'll buy one of those Trumpy bears and use it to aggravate my liberal friends.

”I got $3500 more in my income tax return.”

What a dumbfucking perspective.

The amount you get back is a reflection of how much of your money the government held onto until you asked for it back, not what rate you pay. Your effective tax rate is what determines if you personally benefited from trump’s tax cuts.

Everything else was exactly the same for both years. Thank you Mr. Trump. You monkey see monkey doers should watch who you call stupid.

Someone who thinks they can measure their effective rate by the size of their refund is completely stupid. Sorry, that’s just how it is, there’s no correlation. And yes, something changed. The tax withholding tables changed. That you don’t know that reveals you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Who said anything about effective rates e beside you? I stated a fact, that's all. I love when inept liberals can't take being wrong. It really highlights their bigotry.

You did when you tried to make it sound like your taxes were reduced by getting a $3500 tefund.

 

[Markle]

There is no legal reason to whitewash and stonewall the Mueller Report.

None. And Congress will call Mueller and Barr to speak publicly and establish that

My highlight above.

Please point out specifically who has said that the Mueller Report should, must, or will be "whitewashed and stonewalled".

 

[Markle]

"THank" Trump for borrowing that money for you......
National Debt Under Trump Rises to $21.7 Trillion


ALSO, who got a lot more of that borrowed money than the moron, Warnose???
“You All Just Got a Lot Richer,” Trump Tells Friends at Mar-a-Lago ..
"You all just got a lot richer," Trump tells friends, referencing tax ...
Trump To Rich People: "You All Just Got A Lot Richer" - YouTube

Amusing. Not a word was said by the far left all during the terms of failed former President Barack Hussein Obama when he doubled our National Debt, reduced the Labor Participation Rate, and, President Obama increased the Gross Debt as a percentage of the GDP. That figure increased from 83% to over 104% when he left.

 

[Markle]

You certainly are. And stupid, to boot. You say very stupid things, and you are in a constant state of agitation.

But.. back to thr topic, crybaby!

Why do you supoose your cult leader said he was cool with releasing the report, but he now isn't? What changed? Did he have a mini stroke?

Please show us your reliable source and working link which supports your allegation that President Donald Trump does not want the Meuller Report released. I've not heard that.

Thank you!

 

[hadit]

I'm sure that will be wrangled out in the courts. The democrats will demand 100% and Barr will demand something less, and the whole thing won't be resolved until mid way through Trump's second term. The bottom line, though, is Barr has more influence than the democrats want, because of Bubba.

If I'm the Democrats, I'm almost as happy to have the political football in the press for the next year or so.

Trump would use it to mercilessly beat the democrats over the head as obsessed, and they would totally fall for it.

He may. I'm not sure mentioning that you were under investigation for 2 years and several of your hires are doing time is the best way to go but you guys seem to not care that he habitually hires felons.

He would simply remind the people that he was investigated thoroughly and that, even though there was no evidence of wrong doing and the report was released, the democrats continue to wail and attempt to take him down.

Hiring multiple felons may be considered “wrong doing” by folks. Paying off porn stars may be considered “wong doing” by some folks. And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Is this really the standard we’re supposed to be reaching for? A president who pays porn stars for sex, hires felons and doesn’t care about the part of the report that confirms the Russians hacked our political machines?

The choice should be made clear by the Democrats.

You would think that, but they don't have clean hands either. And when a multi year investigation by a seasoned prosecutor with virtually unlimited funds and resources fails to uncover illegal activity, further hounding by the usual suspects is rightly seen as overreach.

 

[wamose]

When will congressional Democrats start doing their job? All this investigating is preventing them from addressing our border crisis. Monkey see monkey do Democrats are obsessed with Medicare for all, the green energy act and identity and race politics, all of which will be fatal to our country. The bottom line is they hate Trump and will do anything to prevent his reelection. In the meantime, I got $3500 more in my income tax return. How about those crumbs, Nancy? Thank you President Trump. I think I'll buy one of those Trumpy bears and use it to aggravate my liberal friends.

”I got $3500 more in my income tax return.”

What a dumbfucking perspective.

The amount you get back is a reflection of how much of your money the government held onto until you asked for it back, not what rate you pay. Your effective tax rate is what determines if you personally benefited from trump’s tax cuts.

Everything else was exactly the same for both years. Thank you Mr. Trump. You monkey see monkey doers should watch who you call stupid.

Someone who thinks they can measure their effective rate by the size of their refund is completely stupid. Sorry, that’s just how it is, there’s no correlation. And yes, something changed. The tax withholding tables changed. That you don’t know that reveals you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Who said anything about effective rates e beside you? I stated a fact, that's all. I love when inept liberals can't take being wrong. It really highlights their bigotry.

You did when you tried to make it sound like your taxes were reduced by getting a $3500 tefund.

This post has absolutely nothing to do with my original statement that I got $3500 more because of the Trump tax cut. You need to learn to read and stop listening to those angry little voices in your head.

 

[Lesh]

There is no legal reason to whitewash and stonewall the Mueller Report.

None. And Congress will call Mueller and Barr to speak publicly and establish that

My highlight above.

Please point out specifically who has said that the Mueller Report should, must, or will be "whitewashed and stonewalled".

"I" said it...and Barr is engaging in it

 

[Lesh]

If I'm the Democrats, I'm almost as happy to have the political football in the press for the next year or so.

Trump would use it to mercilessly beat the democrats over the head as obsessed, and they would totally fall for it.

He may. I'm not sure mentioning that you were under investigation for 2 years and several of your hires are doing time is the best way to go but you guys seem to not care that he habitually hires felons.

He would simply remind the people that he was investigated thoroughly and that, even though there was no evidence of wrong doing and the report was released, the democrats continue to wail and attempt to take him down.

Hiring multiple felons may be considered “wrong doing” by folks. Paying off porn stars may be considered “wong doing” by some folks. And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Is this really the standard we’re supposed to be reaching for? A president who pays porn stars for sex, hires felons and doesn’t care about the part of the report that confirms the Russians hacked our political machines?

The choice should be made clear by the Democrats.

You would think that, but they don't have clean hands either. And when a multi year investigation by a seasoned prosecutor with virtually unlimited funds and resources fails to uncover illegal activity, further hounding by the usual suspects is rightly seen as overreach.

In no way did even Barr's first Press release claim that no illegal activity was uncovered. In fact just the opposite.

You did read the "not exonerated" part right

 

[candycorn]

If I'm the Democrats, I'm almost as happy to have the political football in the press for the next year or so.

Trump would use it to mercilessly beat the democrats over the head as obsessed, and they would totally fall for it.

He may. I'm not sure mentioning that you were under investigation for 2 years and several of your hires are doing time is the best way to go but you guys seem to not care that he habitually hires felons.

He would simply remind the people that he was investigated thoroughly and that, even though there was no evidence of wrong doing and the report was released, the democrats continue to wail and attempt to take him down.

Hiring multiple felons may be considered “wrong doing” by folks. Paying off porn stars may be considered “wong doing” by some folks. And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Is this really the standard we’re supposed to be reaching for? A president who pays porn stars for sex, hires felons and doesn’t care about the part of the report that confirms the Russians hacked our political machines?

The choice should be made clear by the Democrats.

You would think that, but they don't have clean hands either. And when a multi year investigation by a seasoned prosecutor with virtually unlimited funds and resources fails to uncover illegal activity, further hounding by the usual suspects is rightly seen as overreach.

So in your book....that it has come out that the President paid off porn stars is a plus?
So in your book....that the President who said he will hire the "best people" hired multiple felons is a plus?
So in your book....that the President who has done nothing to punish Russia for hacking our election apparatus is a plus?

 

[hadit]

Trump would use it to mercilessly beat the democrats over the head as obsessed, and they would totally fall for it.

He may. I'm not sure mentioning that you were under investigation for 2 years and several of your hires are doing time is the best way to go but you guys seem to not care that he habitually hires felons.

He would simply remind the people that he was investigated thoroughly and that, even though there was no evidence of wrong doing and the report was released, the democrats continue to wail and attempt to take him down.

Hiring multiple felons may be considered “wrong doing” by folks. Paying off porn stars may be considered “wong doing” by some folks. And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Is this really the standard we’re supposed to be reaching for? A president who pays porn stars for sex, hires felons and doesn’t care about the part of the report that confirms the Russians hacked our political machines?

The choice should be made clear by the Democrats.

You would think that, but they don't have clean hands either. And when a multi year investigation by a seasoned prosecutor with virtually unlimited funds and resources fails to uncover illegal activity, further hounding by the usual suspects is rightly seen as overreach.

In no way did even Barr's first Press release claim that no illegal activity was uncovered. In fact just the opposite.

You did read the "not exonerated" part right

Keep hope alive.

 

[hadit]

Trump would use it to mercilessly beat the democrats over the head as obsessed, and they would totally fall for it.

He may. I'm not sure mentioning that you were under investigation for 2 years and several of your hires are doing time is the best way to go but you guys seem to not care that he habitually hires felons.

He would simply remind the people that he was investigated thoroughly and that, even though there was no evidence of wrong doing and the report was released, the democrats continue to wail and attempt to take him down.

Hiring multiple felons may be considered “wrong doing” by folks. Paying off porn stars may be considered “wong doing” by some folks. And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Is this really the standard we’re supposed to be reaching for? A president who pays porn stars for sex, hires felons and doesn’t care about the part of the report that confirms the Russians hacked our political machines?

The choice should be made clear by the Democrats.

You would think that, but they don't have clean hands either. And when a multi year investigation by a seasoned prosecutor with virtually unlimited funds and resources fails to uncover illegal activity, further hounding by the usual suspects is rightly seen as overreach.

So in your book....that it has come out that the President paid off porn stars is a plus?
So in your book....that the President who said he will hire the "best people" hired multiple felons is a plus?
So in your book....that the President who has done nothing to punish Russia for hacking our election apparatus is a plus?

A plus? Where did I say that? If you can't find it, feel free to admit you just made it up.

 

[Faun]

”I got $3500 more in my income tax return.”

What a dumbfucking perspective.

The amount you get back is a reflection of how much of your money the government held onto until you asked for it back, not what rate you pay. Your effective tax rate is what determines if you personally benefited from trump’s tax cuts.

Everything else was exactly the same for both years. Thank you Mr. Trump. You monkey see monkey doers should watch who you call stupid.

Someone who thinks they can measure their effective rate by the size of their refund is completely stupid. Sorry, that’s just how it is, there’s no correlation. And yes, something changed. The tax withholding tables changed. That you don’t know that reveals you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Who said anything about effective rates e beside you? I stated a fact, that's all. I love when inept liberals can't take being wrong. It really highlights their bigotry.

You did when you tried to make it sound like your taxes were reduced by getting a $3500 tefund.

This post has absolutely nothing to do with my original statement that I got $3500 more because of the Trump tax cut. You need to learn to read and stop listening to those angry little voices in your head.

LOLOL

You lose when you change your statement as it reveals you’re full of shit. You didn’t say, ”I got $3500 more,” as you now say. What you actually said was, “I got $3500 more in my income tax return.”

And income tax returns do not reflect effective tax rates.

Thanks for playin’

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Who told you he wasn't cool with it being released?..

Trump did, dumbass. Pay attention!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You certainly are. And stupid, to boot. You say very stupid things, and you are in a constant state of agitation.

But.. back to thr topic, crybaby!

Why do you supoose your cult leader said he was cool with releasing the report, but he now isn't? What changed? Did he have a mini stroke?

Please show us your reliable source and working link which supports your allegation that President Donald Trump does not want the Meuller Report released. I've not heard that.

Thank you!

No cultist, you should already know he is panning the report and the release of it. If you don't, then you are a goddamn idiot.

 

[M14 Shooter]

And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Wait... you're critical of The Obama administration?

Sure.
Not that Obama deserves criticism on this matter

He doesn't deserve criticism for allowing the Russians to meddle with the 2016 election?
Why?

 

[Slyhunter]

Trump would use it to mercilessly beat the democrats over the head as obsessed, and they would totally fall for it.

He may. I'm not sure mentioning that you were under investigation for 2 years and several of your hires are doing time is the best way to go but you guys seem to not care that he habitually hires felons.

He would simply remind the people that he was investigated thoroughly and that, even though there was no evidence of wrong doing and the report was released, the democrats continue to wail and attempt to take him down.

Hiring multiple felons may be considered “wrong doing” by folks. Paying off porn stars may be considered “wong doing” by some folks. And if you’re hanging your hat on the Mueller Report, not doing a thing about the Russian hacking of our political apparatus may be considered “wrong doing”.

Is this really the standard we’re supposed to be reaching for? A president who pays porn stars for sex, hires felons and doesn’t care about the part of the report that confirms the Russians hacked our political machines?

The choice should be made clear by the Democrats.

You would think that, but they don't have clean hands either. And when a multi year investigation by a seasoned prosecutor with virtually unlimited funds and resources fails to uncover illegal activity, further hounding by the usual suspects is rightly seen as overreach.

In no way did even Barr's first Press release claim that no illegal activity was uncovered. In fact just the opposite.

You did read the "not exonerated" part right

You haven't been exonerated of being a moron, it doesn't mean you are a moron.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He doesn't deserve criticism for allowing the Russians to meddle with the 2016 election?
Why?

Why would he? What do you suggest.... that we invade Russia? Obama focused on securing our physical voting systems. Same thing anyone would have done... well, except for Trump the Child President, who denies all of those events....

 

[M14 Shooter]

He doesn't deserve criticism for allowing the Russians to meddle with the 2016 election?
Why?

Why would he?.

He knew about it and allowed it to happen...?
Yes, Obama Mishandled Russia's Election Hacking. But So Has Trump
Obama team was warned in 2014 about Russian interference

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He knew about it and allowed it to happen...?

Allowed...what? What would obama have done, by exectutive order? I mean, i think its fair to look back and say, "he ahoild have done this ____" with the benefit of hondsight. But i am curiois as to how obama would have stymied the Russian propaganda campaign, in your estimation.

By the way, those Russian efforts contiue relatively unabated, as we saw in the midterms. So now you have trump, with the benefit of hindsight that obama did not have, "letting"" the russians do this. Boy, that must really piss you off! Or not...