What Kind of Moron Really Thinks This is a "Floors Pancaking" Collapse on 9/11?

[munkle]

Towers 200 feet wide, speeds of those cut beams flying calculated at 80 MPH. But some people really really are not going to see anything but what they want to see.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No evidence of explosives or thermite.

 

[munkle]

No evidence of explosives or thermite.

Exactly right. Because they never looked.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Exactly right. Because they never looked.

How difficult would it be to see hundreds or thousands of demo rigs?

 

[toobfreak]

No evidence of explosives or thermite.

No possibility of installing all of the explosives and stuff that would be needed bring those buildings down in a controlled explosion. Lots of people would have noticed the WTC being closed for days/weeks and walls and stuff all torn apart and stuff moved. OP doesn't realize it but his own video simply goes farther to prove what engineers and builders of the WTC already knew and have been telling us for a quarter century:

Those "puffs" in the video are nothing more than smoke and bits being blown out as each floor above let loose under load and slammed down on the next floor below.

 

[Dragonlady]

Towers 200 feet wide, speeds of those cut beams flying calculated at 80 MPH. But some people really really are not going to see anything but what they want to see.

Why is this in "current events"????

 

[Maxdeath]

They do not build any tower to withstand the weight of a large plane all that fuel plus passengers and suitcases plus all the office equipment. Add to that taking out a number of support columns and the fire not helping. It was amazing that they held up as long as they did.

 

[Dragonlady]

They do not build any tower to withstand the weight of a large plane all that fuel plus passengers and suitcases plus all the office equipment. Add to that taking out a number of support columns and the fire not helping. It was amazing that they held up as long as they did.

Not to mention the extreme heat of the explosions of all of that jet fuel.

 

[toobfreak]

They do not build any tower to withstand the weight of a large plane all that fuel plus passengers and suitcases plus all the office equipment. Add to that taking out a number of support columns and the fire not helping. It was amazing that they held up as long as they did.

In the 1960s when the WTC was designed and built, they never gave any thought to someone deliberately flying a jumbo jet into the WTC. All they considered was the possibility that a small private plane might accidentally hit it on a bad weather day or something.

When those jets hit, their explosion blew off the fire-retardant coating that was supposed to protect the structural steel. The WTC was a novel design: a strong central tower for elevators, plumbing and wiring with a rather flimsy outer shell that could not even support itself.

All that kept the outer shell in place from twisting and collapsing was the interconnecting floors which tied the central column to the outer skin.

 

[ozro]

Blame Trump. He hated his towers having competition.

 

[JusticeHammer]

How difficult would it be to see hundreds or thousands of demo rigs?

Not hard

 

[MarathonMike]

Blame Trump. He hated his towers having competition.

I'm surprised the Democrats haven't used that one!

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

They do not build any tower to withstand the weight of a large plane all that fuel plus passengers and suitcases plus all the office equipment. Add to that taking out a number of support columns and the fire not helping. It was amazing that they held up as long as they did.

Yes, except none of that happened to the third tower, WTC7.

 

[toobfreak]

Yes, except none of that happened to the third tower, WTC7.

Oh dear god, why don't you start reading old threads so people don't need to keep repeating stuff over and over about what happened and why.

 

[Maxdeath]

Yes, except none of that happened to the third tower, WTC7.

Any idea how interconnected all them were?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Oh dear god, why don't you start reading old threads so people don't need to keep repeating stuff over and over about what happened and why.

Why would I waste time reading old posts on THIS message board when most of them were provided by individuals who are unable to support the claims they make.

Wouldn't a more diverse set of professional opinions be more likely to provide a plausible or scientific explanation that THIS message board?

Or maybe I'm being too subtle?

 

[toobfreak]

Why would I waste time reading old posts on THIS message board

Because then you wouldn't need to keep asking questions already long ago answered.

 

[MarathonMike]

Why would I waste time reading old posts on THIS message board when most of them were provided by individuals who are unable to support the claims they make.

Wouldn't a more diverse set of professional opinions be more likely to provide a plausible or scientific explanation that THIS message board?

Or maybe I'm being too subtle?

The bolded sentence above is vague word salad, would you care to try again?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Because then you wouldn't need to keep asking questions already long ago answered.

Where is the question in my response?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Any idea how interconnected all them were?

It's been a long time since I've studied the details of what happened that day but what I do remember is that WTC7 contained offices for some very significant companies & federal government agencies. And that because the case files and evidence were destroyed when the building collapsed, a lot of people/companies escaped consequences for things they were being investigated or were charged with.

And that WTC7 didn't collapse until roughly 6 hours after the initial impact of WTC1.