What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids?

[Vox]

What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids? You mean other than the fact that it's physically impossible? The ***** that bailed should be footing the bill, not the guy.

theoretically - yes.
but practically - what if she was against the children?
how can you prove without any legal document that it was their mutual decision, not just the biological mother?

 

[The T]

Your logic is retarded, like you, I imagine.

his logic is actually pretty straightforward.

do not "help" anybody with your biologic procreation material.

It will haunt you for the next 18 years - financially

Not if you do it legally and not the ACME home legal kit. The father of our children has no legal rights. He relinquished them and my spouse was declared their legal parent by a judge...because you can do that in CA. Can you in KS, home of Fred Phelps?

TELL that to GOD on Judgement day, toots...See where he puts you...

 

[Seawytch]

Funny that this lesbian couple wanted the right to have a family this guy gave them the right and once they broke up the mother of the child goes after the man .. This man should NOT be held accountable for the child support it should be the other woman in who was in the relationship while they BOTH decided to have a child. If you want to have the laws to change to give you the same rights as a every other marriage or relationship then you go after the person you started that family with not some sperm donor you got on craigslist. Off topic who really gets sperm from craigslist at least from a sperm bank you know it is safe sperm not some random guy you put a want ad for.

Get your facts straight. the mother ask for State assistance and the State made her disclose who the biological father was and THEN the STATE not the mother went after him.

Sure. However if the couple had been legally married or the non -birthing woman had legally adopted the child, the case would be without merit.
That should be the law. In cases where an unmarried couple decide to have a child in this manner or adopt, then BOTH should be legal parents. In the case of a same sex couple, both must adopt.

It depends on what state you're in...

http://www.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/parenting_joint-adoption_062013.pdf

 

[Seawytch]

What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids? You mean other than the fact that it's physically impossible? The ***** that bailed should be footing the bill, not the guy.

If they could have been legally married, the state could have gone after her.

 

[Seawytch]

This is an outrageous attempt at a money grab.
The sad part is, even if the father of the child wins the suit, he loses. Loses due to the expense of hiring an attorney to defend himself against this nonsense.
Should the father lose, it will send a chill through the entire network of clinics and professionals in the AI industry.
Couples looking to become parents will struggle to find willing individuals to participate.

He's an idiot that should have gotten the lawyer BEFORE putting his man juice in a syringe.

they all are POOR.
they do not have money for the lawyer.
Neither they have too many brains, BTW.
The situation is idiotic and basically nobody could be held responsible except the mother.
But the other partner wanted the baby first as well. Then just deserted.

Thank you for your support of marriage equality.

 

[thereisnospoon]

More proof that Cons are bigots.

Children who are raised in households with same-sex parents are more likely to lead healthier lives, according to preliminary findings of a new study. Australian researchers at the University of Melbourne found that children of gay parents not only are healthier overall, but also are more likely to get along with the rest of their family unit.

Children With Same-Sex Parents ?Healthier, Less Argumentative,? Australian Study Says

Quick..where is the...never mind. I found it...
Preliminary findings of a study....Oh? Commissioned by whom?
Skippy....anyone with an agenda can pay anyone to perform a study that has a predetermined result....They are PAYING for the result. Not the study.
You have a pro homosexual agenda. So a study done in Aussie land presents a result you like....And with this, you claim heterosexual parents are not adequate..
Brilliant....And how many people do you expect will believe this nonsense?

 

[Seawytch]

What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids? You mean other than the fact that it's physically impossible? The ***** that bailed should be footing the bill, not the guy.

It's as "physically impossible" as it was for Romney's son (who used a surrogate).

Thank you for your support of marriage equality.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Your logic is retarded, like you, I imagine.

his logic is actually pretty straightforward.

do not "help" anybody with your biologic procreation material.

It will haunt you for the next 18 years - financially

Not if you do it legally and not the ACME home legal kit. The father of our children has no legal rights. He relinquished them and my spouse was declared their legal parent by a judge...because you can do that in CA. Can you in KS, home of Fred Phelps?

If qualified, anyone can adopt. Marriage has never been a prerequisite to child bearing.
Don't make this a gay marriage issue.
Look, I realize that many in the militant homosexual community have a huge chip on their shoulder with regard to traditional marriage and two parent households.
Newsflash, the concept is not going anywhere for a foreseeable future.
The way i see it, if two consenting adults want to be a couple in the eyes of the law, let them. However, they don't get to come crying to others when things don't work out quite the way they thought it would.
I cannot see why anyone would want to engage into a pact that fails more than half the time.
They are welcome to it though.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Get your facts straight. the mother ask for State assistance and the State made her disclose who the biological father was and THEN the STATE not the mother went after him.

Sure. However if the couple had been legally married or the non -birthing woman had legally adopted the child, the case would be without merit.
That should be the law. In cases where an unmarried couple decide to have a child in this manner or adopt, then BOTH should be legal parents. In the case of a same sex couple, both must adopt.

It depends on what state you're in...

http://www.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/parenting_joint-adoption_062013.pdf

Yeah..And these three idiots should have considered the consequences of their actions..
Of course adults should not be required to do THAT...NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

 

[thereisnospoon]

What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids? You mean other than the fact that it's physically impossible? The ***** that bailed should be footing the bill, not the guy.

It's as "physically impossible" as it was for Romney's son (who used a surrogate).

Thank you for your support of marriage equality.

Biologically....It takes the male sperm to meet the female egg.
In vitro fertilization and artificial insemination is using modern technology to prove a point.
Marriage equality....be careful what you wish for.....

 

[thereisnospoon]

The couple did not initiate the case of the one I know about, that would be the State. One of the mothers got sick and they broke up as I recall.

As i read the story, the sexuality of the couple is not relevant. However, their 'marital' status is .
Had the couple been legally wed, the case would never have gone this far.
This is why ONLY legally married people should be permitted to go this route.

which route? how can you forbid a woman to get pregnant from AI anywhere else?
her partner, whomever it would be can not be responsible for the child, if that is not their mutual decision - and obviously that can never be proven 100% if there is no legal contract or some kind of certificate for mutual agreement.

I should add, in the absence of marriage, both persons in the couple should be compelled to enter into a legal adoption.

 

[thereisnospoon]

or WHOSE YOUR DADDY?

This is why homosexual couples should not be afforded the right to have children: Kansas judge hears arguments in case of sperm donor sued for child support - U.S. News

This is an outrageous attempt at a money grab.
The sad part is, even if the father of the child wins the suit, he loses. Loses due to the expense of hiring an attorney to defend himself against this nonsense.
Should the father lose, it will send a chill through the entire network of clinics and professionals in the AI industry.
Couples looking to become parents will struggle to find willing individuals to participate.

He's an idiot that should have gotten the lawyer BEFORE putting his man juice in a syringe.

"Man juice"....without that which you so crudely refer, there are no kiddies for you and your 'partner'..
You militant lesbos are a ******* piece of work.
Oh....That cuts both ways. The 'mommy' should have gotten the other 'mommy' to commit to parental responsibility for the life of the child up to age 26( don't forget Obamacare rules) before she pulled out the turkey baster.
Yeah genius. I can go crude as well. Wanna dance, missy?

 

[LittleNipper]

Funny that this lesbian couple wanted the right to have a family this guy gave them the right and once they broke up the mother of the child goes after the man .. This man should NOT be held accountable for the child support it should be the other woman in who was in the relationship while they BOTH decided to have a child. If you want to have the laws to change to give you the same rights as a every other marriage or relationship then you go after the person you started that family with not some sperm donor you got on craigslist. Off topic who really gets sperm from craigslist at least from a sperm bank you know it is safe sperm not some random guy you put a want ad for.

Get your facts straight. the mother ask for State assistance and the State made her disclose who the biological father was and THEN the STATE not the mother went after him.

The lady should have went after her lover. The logical problem is that a woman cannot be a daddy. This is the inherent problem with homosexual "marriage."

 

[LittleNipper]

More proof that Cons are bigots.

Children who are raised in households with same-sex parents are more likely to lead healthier lives, according to preliminary findings of a new study. Australian researchers at the University of Melbourne found that children of gay parents not only are healthier overall, but also are more likely to get along with the rest of their family unit.

Children With Same-Sex Parents ?Healthier, Less Argumentative,? Australian Study Says

What is the criteria of "healthier?" Fatter? Stronger? Better hygiene? The very same problem is presented with "less" argumentative. What is meant? The children are allowed to do anything they wish without having to deal with parental disagreement? The children are not made to do anything they don't want to? Such would not be parental guidance at all.

 

[bianco]

Simple solution...never donate sperm.

"Look after yourself first in this world, son...because nobody else will" - my first boss.

 

[Seawytch]

his logic is actually pretty straightforward.

do not "help" anybody with your biologic procreation material.

It will haunt you for the next 18 years - financially

Not if you do it legally and not the ACME home legal kit. The father of our children has no legal rights. He relinquished them and my spouse was declared their legal parent by a judge...because you can do that in CA. Can you in KS, home of Fred Phelps?

If qualified, anyone can adopt. Marriage has never been a prerequisite to child bearing.
Don't make this a gay marriage issue.

No, they can't. You're just displaying your ignorance. Many states prohibit 2nd parent adoptions by gays and lesbians and many prohibit single adoptions.

 

[Seawytch]

What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids? You mean other than the fact that it's physically impossible? The ***** that bailed should be footing the bill, not the guy.

It's as "physically impossible" as it was for Romney's son (who used a surrogate).

Thank you for your support of marriage equality.

Biologically....It takes the male sperm to meet the female egg.
In vitro fertilization and artificial insemination is using modern technology to prove a point.
Marriage equality....be careful what you wish for.....

Oooh, scary! I've been legally married almost 5 years now. No ill effects...

 

[Seawytch]

This is an outrageous attempt at a money grab.
The sad part is, even if the father of the child wins the suit, he loses. Loses due to the expense of hiring an attorney to defend himself against this nonsense.
Should the father lose, it will send a chill through the entire network of clinics and professionals in the AI industry.
Couples looking to become parents will struggle to find willing individuals to participate.

He's an idiot that should have gotten the lawyer BEFORE putting his man juice in a syringe.

"Man juice"....without that which you so crudely refer, there are no kiddies for you and your 'partner'..
You militant lesbos are a ******* piece of work.
Oh....That cuts both ways. The 'mommy' should have gotten the other 'mommy' to commit to parental responsibility for the life of the child up to age 26( don't forget Obamacare rules) before she pulled out the turkey baster.
Yeah genius. I can go crude as well. Wanna dance, missy?

How could "the 'mommy' should have gotten the other 'mommy' to commit to parental responsibility" if there are no 2nd parent adoptions for same sex couples in their state? Legal marriage could have solved it all...too bad they weren't allowed in their state.

 

[Katzndogz]

What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids? You mean other than the fact that it's physically impossible? The ***** that bailed should be footing the bill, not the guy.

It's as "physically impossible" as it was for Romney's son (who used a surrogate).

Thank you for your support of marriage equality.

Romney's son used a surrogate because of a medical reason. If it were not for that circumstance the couple would have had their own children. Homosexual couples can never create bioligical children no matter how heathy and perfect their reproductive organs are. That's the difference between impossibility and improbability.

 

[Seawytch]

What is wrong with Homosexual couples having kids? You mean other than the fact that it's physically impossible? The ***** that bailed should be footing the bill, not the guy.

It's as "physically impossible" as it was for Romney's son (who used a surrogate).

Thank you for your support of marriage equality.

Romney's son used a surrogate because of a medical reason. If it were not for that circumstance the couple would have had their own children. Homosexual couples can never create bioligical children no matter how heathy and perfect their reproductive organs are. That's the difference between impossibility and improbability.

Gay couples use AI and surrogacy for the same reason hets do...to have kids.

It might not be too long before two women CAN have kids...

Ova-Fusion and the Elimination of the Male