saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
So when the slaves were freed they were given 'special' rights that 'superseded' those who disagreed with them?
Goddam, you've caught Where are my Keys disease.
Slaves were not exhibiting DEVIANT BEHAVIOR Gilligan.
Deviant behavior - as you call it - is constitutional.
No Gilligan, it's not. You 'feel' strongly that it is... but you've no means to sustain your 'feelings', thus such is merely a manifestation of the same mental disorder that presents as sexual deviancy.
You see you demand that such is true, where such is literally and inarguably false.
Where you are able to convince someone else of that drivel, you take the injury to yourself... and transmit it to another, proving that such is destructive.
Where such is transmitted to sufficient members of the culture, this makes it entirely unlikely that the culture will be capable of sustaining itself, and this by virtue of the culture's collective inability to discern the distinction between right and wrong. Thus their collective decisions, are likely to be flawed and where one strings together sufficient numbers of flawed decisions, one destroys their viability.
Such is as true for individuals as it is for the sum of individuals, OKA: The Culture, Society, Civilization.
Homosexual acts between consenting adults are constitutionally protected.
No they aren't.