What is the point in having a Supreme Commander POtUS

If any lawyer in a cubby hole can get in his way or any judge from Podunk can also?
It’s not the American Way
Before virtue signaling snd participation trophies we competed, won and lost and dealt with both. Now everything not from lib land is an international emotional tragedy and Trump must be stopped. You had your chance to stop him You lost, so start acting like grown ups.
So they are supposed to just sit back and watch him take us back to the 1950s.
 
No, the Constitution spells out those powers.
In the light of SCOTUS rulings. Jefferson wanted to make those rulings, John Marshall, the Chief Justice, turned him around and bent him over and had his way with him, and so will this SCOTUS with the President.
 
If any lawyer in a cubby hole can get in his way or any judge from Podunk can also?
It’s not the American Way
Before virtue signaling snd participation trophies we competed, won and lost and dealt with both. Now everything not from lib land is an international emotional tragedy and Trump must be stopped. You had your chance to stop him You lost, so start acting like grown ups.
Awwwwwwwwwwww, come on. After acting like children for all of their lives, you can't really expect them to act like grown ups now.
 
Makes no sense that the highest position in the USA can be thwarted by a one in 10 million judge or lawyer.
Does not make sense, really is not reality and that’s why lib loons embrace this thwarting. Not checks and balances but rather interference.
 
Makes no sense that the highest position in the USA can be thwarted by a one in 10 million judge or lawyer.
Does not make sense, really is not reality and that’s why lib loons embrace this thwarting. Not checks and balances but rather interference.
checks and balances, goober

we don't want a dictator
 
checks and balances, goober

we don't want a dictator
The Judicial Branch doesn't run the country. We don't want a thousand dictators, either. No one in the Judicial Branch is elected. The president is. The president can be voted out. The judges can't.
 
Where in the world did you get the idea the president of the United States is a "Supreme Commander"???

This isn't a fascist state, though Trump is trying to make it so.
That reference has been used throughout the ages.
Your false hysterical session has concluded
 
Look at it this way. None of their crap is going anywhere, none of it will affect Trump,
and all of it is just further wasting more of the Left's time and money
while keeping them from pursuing other things!
That is true, but keep working the social media everybody because it is the only mass audience vehicle we have to get the real skinny out there to offset a still very dishonest MSM/legacy media.

And keep your posts as un-insulting as reasonable and make sure your posts can't be torn apart by their so-called fact checkers.

When the truth is allowed, all the propaganda, lies, virtue signaling, etc. is exposed for what it is. Otherwise they'll reverse as much as they can in the midterms.
 
The Judicial Branch doesn't run the country. We don't want a thousand dictators, either. No one in the Judicial Branch is elected. The president is. The president can be voted out. The judges can't.

Of course it does not. You do not understand the Constitution is your problem. Checks and balances prevents anyone or any institution to be dictatorial. You think the lege and court are controlling the President?
 
Of course it does not. You do not understand the Constitution is your problem. Checks and balances prevents anyone or any institution to be dictatorial. You think the lege and court are controlling the President?

Why didn't it work with Biden? Ignoring SCOTUS rulings and illegally forgiving billions in student debt, in direct violation of the law? What happened to checks and balances for dems?
 
15th post
That reference has been used throughout the ages.
Your false hysterical session has concluded

There is no civilian Supreme Commander. This is the first time I have seen it used as an every day definition for POTUS.
 
Far more than MAGA. It's good the executive backed off on the freeze. That is good politics.

Really? Care to explain BILLIONS in illegally spent funds to forgive debt Biden had ZERO right to do and had been told SPECIFICALLY BY THE SUPREME COURT that it was illegal to do so?
 
Why didn't it work with Biden? Ignoring SCOTUS rulings and illegally forgiving billions in student debt, in direct violation of the law? What happened to checks and balances for dems?
Biden's first attempt was illegal and he was checked by the courts. Didn't your MAGA media tell you this?

His second attempt was legal because he was correcting errors made in the administration of a law enacted in 2008 which was supposed to forgive loans if the recipients completed 10 years of public service.

Most of those who completed that service did not have their loans forgiven because the private company which managed those loans was denying their claims and financially raping them.

There was also a fraudulent organization called The Center for Excellence in Higher Education which ripped off nearly 85,000 students.

Biden fixed that harm.

Now you can tag this post with False News and pretend the lies you've been told are real.
 
Really? Care to explain BILLIONS in illegally spent funds to forgive debt Biden had ZERO right to do and had been told SPECIFICALLY BY THE SUPREME COURT that it was illegal to do so?

^^^ Fallacy of logical equivalency.

We are talking about Trump staying within the law.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom