- Thread starter
- #61
Nothing is inherent. All rights, including those stated in the Constitution, are man-made constructs.nothing semantic about it,,
property rights are inherent and its the governments job to protect it not grant it,, just like other rights stated in the constitution,,
if you have regulations thats not free market thats government controlled capitalism,,, theres a difference,,
I have tried to address each of your points directly,, you have ignored every point I have made and just repeat the same garbage,,
That includes voting, which for most of US history banned women from voting.
I have not ignored them , we simply have a different framework.
For some reason you think property rights are inherent. Why? What's so special about them?
I could equally argue that access to water and food should be inherent rights, even more so. You can leave without any property, but without food and water you are dead.