The adding of "adversity" scores to the SAT begs the larger question of the current purpose of the SAT. If it still is to measure scholastic aptitude for success in college, then why would non-scholastic factors be included? If it is no longer used for this purpose, then why have it at all?
The very fact that these "adversity" scores are to be kept secret reveals a corrupt intention in the first place. Not only do they compromise the premise of individual achievement, they promote false expectations that are less likely to be realized.
Why not dispense with the SAT and institute a lottery system for admission to college? Wouldn't this be the fairest way to provide equal opportunity for all?
The very fact that these "adversity" scores are to be kept secret reveals a corrupt intention in the first place. Not only do they compromise the premise of individual achievement, they promote false expectations that are less likely to be realized.
Why not dispense with the SAT and institute a lottery system for admission to college? Wouldn't this be the fairest way to provide equal opportunity for all?
