jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem most conservatives have is not with mathematics but in algebraic projection.
It is as if they have never plotted a graph and extended it to a point in time on the X axis.
Figure this out;
A) jobs are being destroyed by the robotics revolution.
B) We live in a democratic Republic
C) as enough jobs are destroyed so that more and more Americans feel like they cannot survive in a purely capitalist system any more, what will they do?
Starve or vote for more and more socialism?
We need to manage this trend by getting ahead of it and putting in place workable solutions ahead of time instead of laughing it all off as 'lazy people wanting free shit'.
If you think that is the case, you dont know what the fuck you are talking about.
Long term your point about robotics is valid.
Short term, Germany has twice the rate of manufacturing jobs we have.
They are not technologically backwards Third Worlds who are competing by working on slave wages
and somehow they do it.
How?
IMO, better Trade Policy.
LMAO George Orwell was not a right wing conservative: he was a progressive and liberal. LOL You guys are hilarious.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
Lol, your own charts disprove your point of contention as only 28% of Bernie supporters are unemployed, meaning that the rest of them are employed.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
not sure about that question
however the number one group by far
who donate to his campaign
are from the "not working" group
go figure
Bullshit. What do you think you accomplish be lying to yourself instead of digging up the relevant facts?
Sanders supporters are wealthier, whiter, and more male than Hillary supporters. - Democratic Underground
Sanders supporters are wealthier, whiter, and more male than Hillary supporters.
This is a simple fact, confirmed by polls.
![]()
![]()
your link is supporters
i said those that donate to his campaign
so get your shit together before you go jumping my ass dipshit
![]()
Who gives money to Bernie Sanders?
The problem most conservatives have is not with mathematics but in algebraic projection.
It is as if they have never plotted a graph and extended it to a point in time on the X axis.
Figure this out;
A) jobs are being destroyed by the robotics revolution.
B) We live in a democratic Republic
C) as enough jobs are destroyed so that more and more Americans feel like they cannot survive in a purely capitalist system any more, what will they do?
Starve or vote for more and more socialism?
We need to manage this trend by getting ahead of it and putting in place workable solutions ahead of time instead of laughing it all off as 'lazy people wanting free shit'.
If you think that is the case, you dont know what the fuck you are talking about.
Yep, 72% of Sanders donors had jobs.
Wow, I'm convinced now that the jobless economy we are all heading for can be solved by posting memes of dummies!Bernie Sanders rally in Calif last night.
View attachment 77305
LMAO George Orwell was not a right wing conservative: he was a progressive and liberal. LOL You guys are hilarious.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
There wouldn't be a shortage of jobs if democrats didn't breed like rabbits.
Quality, not quantity.
George Orwell wasn't a Progressive in the sense Progressive is meant today, have you read "Animal Farm"?
"Animal Farm" is a devastating critique of Marxist Utopia ie. Totalitarian Leftism, which is exactly what today's Progressives are, they're Totalitarian Leftist's, illustrated on a daily basis by the fanatical intolerance they exhibit towards anyone who disagrees with either them or The Leftist Agenda.
George Orwell, Eric Blair would be horrified at today's Progressives, just like John F. Kennedy would.
LMAO George Orwell was not a right wing conservative: he was a progressive and liberal. LOL You guys are hilarious.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
You're correct that he was ultra left, not a right winger. But he did write books warning about totalitarian leftism like Animal Farm and 1984. Votto is correct about his saying that. Where did Votto say he was right wing though? I don't see that
LMAO George Orwell was not a right wing conservative: he was a progressive and liberal. LOL You guys are hilarious.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
You're correct that he was ultra left, not a right winger. But he did write books warning about totalitarian leftism like Animal Farm and 1984. Votto is correct about his saying that. Where did Votto say he was right wing though? I don't see that
Great minds and all that, I was writing mentioning "Animal Farm" and Totalitarian Leftism at the same time as you were.
George Orwell wasn't a Progressive in the sense Progressive is meant today, have you read "Animal Farm"?
"Animal Farm" is a devastating critique of Marxist Utopia ie. Totalitarian Leftism, which is exactly what today's Progressives are, they're Totalitarian Leftist's, illustrated on a daily basis by the fanatical intolerance they exhibit towards anyone who disagrees with either them or The Leftist Agenda.
George Orwell, Eric Blair would be horrified at today's Progressives, just like John F. Kennedy would.
You just committed the 'Speaking Facts to a Libtard Fallacy'.
Just to let you know.
There wouldn't be a shortage of jobs if democrats didn't breed like rabbits.
Quality, not quantity.
That is simply not true. Robotics will replace the vast majority of jobs by 2040 in every profession.
So what will be the GOP platform as we transition to a jobless economy? 'Let them eat cake?'
Lol, your own charts disprove your point of contention as only 28% of Bernie supporters are unemployed, meaning that the rest of them are employed.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
not sure about that question
however the number one group by far
who donate to his campaign
are from the "not working" group
go figure
Bullshit. What do you think you accomplish be lying to yourself instead of digging up the relevant facts?
Sanders supporters are wealthier, whiter, and more male than Hillary supporters. - Democratic Underground
Sanders supporters are wealthier, whiter, and more male than Hillary supporters.
This is a simple fact, confirmed by polls.
![]()
![]()
your link is supporters
i said those that donate to his campaign
so get your shit together before you go jumping my ass dipshit
![]()
Who gives money to Bernie Sanders?
And learn how to do attributions some time, mmk?
Lol, your own charts disprove your point of contention as only 28% of Bernie supporters are unemployed, meaning that the rest of them are employed.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
not sure about that question
however the number one group by far
who donate to his campaign
are from the "not working" group
go figure
Bullshit. What do you think you accomplish be lying to yourself instead of digging up the relevant facts?
Sanders supporters are wealthier, whiter, and more male than Hillary supporters. - Democratic Underground
Sanders supporters are wealthier, whiter, and more male than Hillary supporters.
This is a simple fact, confirmed by polls.
![]()
![]()
your link is supporters
i said those that donate to his campaign
so get your shit together before you go jumping my ass dipshit
![]()
Who gives money to Bernie Sanders?
And learn how to do attributions some time, mmk?
Not any more.Actually progressive and liberal are two different animals
There wouldn't be a shortage of jobs if democrats didn't breed like rabbits.
Quality, not quantity.
That is simply not true. Robotics will replace the vast majority of jobs by 2040 in every profession.
So what will be the GOP platform as we transition to a jobless economy? 'Let them eat cake?'
It is true, and you know it.
Not any more.Actually progressive and liberal are two different animals
PEople who self identify as liberals are antiwhite racists, largely and Marxists if they are in leadership poisitons.
The liberal movement is entirely hijacked by Marxists and antiwhite racism.
LMAO George Orwell was not a right wing conservative: he was a progressive and liberal. LOL You guys are hilarious.Math seems hard for Bernie supporters. Hard to believe I know.
Math Is Hard for Sanders Supporters | The American Spectator
Seventy years ago, George Orwell explained why so many bad ideas are unquestioningly accepted and advocated by the left: “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is ‘not done’ to say it.” This is precisely why the Urban Institute (UI) is under attack from Bernie Sanders supporters and other progressives. The left-of-center think tank recently released a study that says the unsayable — Medicare for All is an unaffordable fantasy.
Medicare for All is the single-payer health care system that most progressives support as a replacement for Obamacare. Sanders, the Vermont senator who is ostensibly running against Hillary Clinton for the Democrat presidential nomination, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign. His website assures us that “Bernie’s plan” will save the country $6 trillion over the next ten years, but UI committed the sin of checking the math, and the study’s authors are not feeling the Bern: “[N]ational health expenditures would increase … by 6.6 trillion (16.6 percent) between 2017 and 2026.”
And this is just a drop in the bucket compared to how much it will increase thegovernment’s health spending:
You're correct that he was ultra left, not a right winger. But he did write books warning about totalitarian leftism like Animal Farm and 1984. Votto is correct about his saying that. Where did Votto say he was right wing though? I don't see that
Great minds and all that, I was writing mentioning "Animal Farm" and Totalitarian Leftism at the same time as you were.
Actually progressive and liberal are two different animals