What is our obligation to the poor?

[danielpalos]

that was in the past. now, when capitalism fails, socialism bails them out.

And that is the problem. It shouldn't. Lessons won't be learned until consequences are owned.

why not merely simplify government, so that it bails us out as consistently as Infrastructure.

Because eventually you run out of other people's money.

only lousy capitalists and lousy socialists do that.

using capitalism for all of its worth, means discovering positive ways to multiply our economy.

No. It doesn't. Using capitalism for all of its worth means freedom and liberty and improved standard of living for all.

discovering positive ways to multiply our economy is using capitalism for all of its worth.

 

[ding]

And that is the problem. It shouldn't. Lessons won't be learned until consequences are owned.

why not merely simplify government, so that it bails us out as consistently as Infrastructure.

Because eventually you run out of other people's money.

only lousy capitalists and lousy socialists do that.

using capitalism for all of its worth, means discovering positive ways to multiply our economy.

No. It doesn't. Using capitalism for all of its worth means freedom and liberty and improved standard of living for all.

discovering positive ways to multiply our economy is using capitalism for all of its worth.

The economy doesn't matter if we don't do the right thing, for the right reason and the right way.

 

[danielpalos]

why not merely simplify government, so that it bails us out as consistently as Infrastructure.

Because eventually you run out of other people's money.

only lousy capitalists and lousy socialists do that.

using capitalism for all of its worth, means discovering positive ways to multiply our economy.

No. It doesn't. Using capitalism for all of its worth means freedom and liberty and improved standard of living for all.

discovering positive ways to multiply our economy is using capitalism for all of its worth.

The economy doesn't matter if we don't do the right thing, for the right reason and the right way.

you say that; i but already know, we don't have enough social morals for free, to go around.

 

[ding]

Because eventually you run out of other people's money.

only lousy capitalists and lousy socialists do that.

using capitalism for all of its worth, means discovering positive ways to multiply our economy.

No. It doesn't. Using capitalism for all of its worth means freedom and liberty and improved standard of living for all.

discovering positive ways to multiply our economy is using capitalism for all of its worth.

The economy doesn't matter if we don't do the right thing, for the right reason and the right way.

you say that; i but already know, we don't have enough social morals for free, to go around.

Yeah, don't hold your breath on that, lol. We'll be fine. Don't worry about it.

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists and lousy socialists do that.

using capitalism for all of its worth, means discovering positive ways to multiply our economy.

No. It doesn't. Using capitalism for all of its worth means freedom and liberty and improved standard of living for all.

discovering positive ways to multiply our economy is using capitalism for all of its worth.

The economy doesn't matter if we don't do the right thing, for the right reason and the right way.

you say that; i but already know, we don't have enough social morals for free, to go around.

Yeah, don't hold your breath on that, lol. We'll be fine. Don't worry about it.

yeah, right. i am advocating for being moral enough to bear True Witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

 

[ding]

No. It doesn't. Using capitalism for all of its worth means freedom and liberty and improved standard of living for all.

discovering positive ways to multiply our economy is using capitalism for all of its worth.

The economy doesn't matter if we don't do the right thing, for the right reason and the right way.

you say that; i but already know, we don't have enough social morals for free, to go around.

Yeah, don't hold your breath on that, lol. We'll be fine. Don't worry about it.

yeah, right. i am advocating for being moral enough to bear True Witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

If only there was a way to guarantee that.

 

[danielpalos]

discovering positive ways to multiply our economy is using capitalism for all of its worth.

The economy doesn't matter if we don't do the right thing, for the right reason and the right way.

you say that; i but already know, we don't have enough social morals for free, to go around.

Yeah, don't hold your breath on that, lol. We'll be fine. Don't worry about it.

yeah, right. i am advocating for being moral enough to bear True Witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

If only there was a way to guarantee that.

how about, "harassing the Judicature" until we get faithful execution of the law?

 

[ding]

The economy doesn't matter if we don't do the right thing, for the right reason and the right way.

you say that; i but already know, we don't have enough social morals for free, to go around.

Yeah, don't hold your breath on that, lol. We'll be fine. Don't worry about it.

yeah, right. i am advocating for being moral enough to bear True Witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

If only there was a way to guarantee that.

how about, "harassing the Judicature" until we get faithful execution of the law?

No. I think you should be aiming higher.

 

[danielpalos]

you say that; i but already know, we don't have enough social morals for free, to go around.

Yeah, don't hold your breath on that, lol. We'll be fine. Don't worry about it.

yeah, right. i am advocating for being moral enough to bear True Witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

If only there was a way to guarantee that.

how about, "harassing the Judicature" until we get faithful execution of the law?

No. I think you should be aiming higher.

higher than a Superior Court?

 

[Bonzi]

most of the poor are there because they want to be or just don't want to work for it.....
there are exceptions, but, too many people are using our very generous system -- we are just enabling them to live better for not trying.....

 

[ding]

Yeah, don't hold your breath on that, lol. We'll be fine. Don't worry about it.

yeah, right. i am advocating for being moral enough to bear True Witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

If only there was a way to guarantee that.

how about, "harassing the Judicature" until we get faithful execution of the law?

No. I think you should be aiming higher.

higher than a Superior Court?

Aim higher.

 

[danielpalos]

most of the poor are there because they want to be or just don't want to work for it.....
there are exceptions, but, too many people are using our very generous system -- we are just enabling them to live better for not trying.....

why do you say that? our system is even more generous, for the rich. are we just enabling them to live better, without even trying, like Labor.

 

[danielpalos]

yeah, right. i am advocating for being moral enough to bear True Witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

If only there was a way to guarantee that.

how about, "harassing the Judicature" until we get faithful execution of the law?

No. I think you should be aiming higher.

higher than a Superior Court?

Aim higher.

i don't think it will require, Supreme, intervention.

 

[ding]

If only there was a way to guarantee that.

how about, "harassing the Judicature" until we get faithful execution of the law?

No. I think you should be aiming higher.

higher than a Superior Court?

Aim higher.

i don't think it will require, Supreme, intervention.

Maybe just a supreme leader. Aim higher.

 

[Bonzi]

most of the poor are there because they want to be or just don't want to work for it.....
there are exceptions, but, too many people are using our very generous system -- we are just enabling them to live better for not trying.....

why do you say that? our system is even more generous, for the rich. are we just enabling them to live better, without even trying, like Labor.

the rich get what they want because people cater to them and give them power.
you can live quite well by world standards making $15 an hour.
it's the governments fault for allowing it to get this way. instead of giving handouts, they should be training losers to be winners

 

[danielpalos]

how about, "harassing the Judicature" until we get faithful execution of the law?

No. I think you should be aiming higher.

higher than a Superior Court?

Aim higher.

i don't think it will require, Supreme, intervention.

Maybe just a supreme leader. Aim higher.

nope; just mere, humble and faithful, execution of our own laws.

 

[ding]

No. I think you should be aiming higher.

higher than a Superior Court?

Aim higher.

i don't think it will require, Supreme, intervention.

Maybe just a supreme leader. Aim higher.

nope; just mere, humble and faithful, execution of our own laws.

Gradualism won't work. The sheep always end up recognizing the wolf. You need to aim higher.

 

[danielpalos]

most of the poor are there because they want to be or just don't want to work for it.....
there are exceptions, but, too many people are using our very generous system -- we are just enabling them to live better for not trying.....

why do you say that? our system is even more generous, for the rich. are we just enabling them to live better, without even trying, like Labor.

the rich get what they want because people cater to them and give them power.
you can live quite well by world standards making $15 an hour.
it's the governments fault for allowing it to get this way. instead of giving handouts, they should be training losers to be winners

just an "easy, feel good" policy from the right wing? It sounds like socialism. What ever happened to the laziness of laissez-fair, regarding the poor spending their social benefits without, micromanagement.

 

[danielpalos]

higher than a Superior Court?

Aim higher.

i don't think it will require, Supreme, intervention.

Maybe just a supreme leader. Aim higher.

nope; just mere, humble and faithful, execution of our own laws.

Gradualism won't work. The sheep always end up recognizing the wolf. You need to aim higher.

Yes, it will. it is how we got our Republic.

 

[ding]

Aim higher.

i don't think it will require, Supreme, intervention.

Maybe just a supreme leader. Aim higher.

nope; just mere, humble and faithful, execution of our own laws.

Gradualism won't work. The sheep always end up recognizing the wolf. You need to aim higher.

Yes, it will. it is how we got our Republic.

No. We got our Republic through guns. Aim higher.