What is it about Kamala Harris that is so disconcerting ?

She’s a stone cold racist who is married to a white guy? How does that work?

She’s married to a Jewish guy. Try again.
You’re right... totally not white. She’s a stone cold white hating racist... keep running with that :cuckoo:

Douglas-Emhoff-family-wife-children.jpg
Lemme guess, she has a white friend too?
 
Criminal prosecutors and politicians all seem to have a few things in common. They're usually highly intelligent and have extensive knowledge of the law, they're fairly good speakers and communicators, and they're very good at lying when needed. But they're not always nasty like Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and some of the other House Democrats were acting toward Attorney General Barr in their recent circus stunt on the Hill.

And it certainly doesn't seem to help their cause now that they've pissed him off, given the new investigation they're very much aware of,. ( although he never once showed it ) But back to Kamala --she definitely has the unnerving Clintonesque disingenuous characteristic that their voters seems to cling to, with a neoliberal corporate agenda that renders the Democratic party which is moving left more dysfunctional than ever.

I believe she's CIA too, but that's for another chapter.
I cannot believe the arrogance and utter disrespect she shows toward this man.


harris is more like a small town city counsel person, she's not presidential
 
Angry Black Woman who thinks she has a chance in hell to be President.

Not going to happen.
Why even bring her race into the discussion? Are you trying to provoke?

Because she relies on race to achieve power. Stop trying to gaslight Americans.

Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, Courting Black Support, Pitch Differing Economic Plans

2020 candidates show unity in South Carolina, wooing black voters and easing up on Biden
So because she does it that makes it ok for others to do it? Really, that’s your response?

So any person, or party, who made an appeal to a particular race for votes would be crossing the line right? What about if they established a committee aimed at increasing the turnout of one particular race? Would you have an opinion on that? Would you countenance a response to such actions or advocate a head in the sand approach to such racism?
Or how about gender? How about a man or party which said “we have to get more men voting and more men into positions of power”?
I never said any of that was crossing the line. It’s marketing 101. Target demographics with the most effective messaging. Racism is a completely different thing.
 
Angry Black Woman who thinks she has a chance in hell to be President.

Not going to happen.
Why even bring her race into the discussion? Are you trying to provoke?

Because she relies on race to achieve power. Stop trying to gaslight Americans.

Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, Courting Black Support, Pitch Differing Economic Plans

2020 candidates show unity in South Carolina, wooing black voters and easing up on Biden
So because she does it that makes it ok for others to do it? Really, that’s your response?

So any person, or party, who made an appeal to a particular race for votes would be crossing the line right? What about if they established a committee aimed at increasing the turnout of one particular race? Would you have an opinion on that? Would you countenance a response to such actions or advocate a head in the sand approach to such racism?
Or how about gender? How about a man or party which said “we have to get more men voting and more men into positions of power”?
I never said any of that was crossing the line. It’s marketing 101. Target demographics with the most effective messaging. Racism is a completely different thing.

Ahhhh just marketing. Like a corporation. Could you point out some of her “marketing” aimed at whites similar to the ones aimed at blacks? Or men?
 
Criminal prosecutors and politicians all seem to have a few things in common. They're usually highly intelligent and have extensive knowledge of the law, they're fairly good speakers and communicators, and they're very good at lying when needed. But they're not always nasty like Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and some of the other House Democrats were acting toward Attorney General Barr in their recent circus stunt on the Hill.

And it certainly doesn't seem to help their cause now that they've pissed him off, given the new investigation they're very much aware of,. ( although he never once showed it ) But back to Kamala --she definitely has the unnerving Clintonesque disingenuous characteristic that their voters seems to cling to, with a neoliberal corporate agenda that renders the Democratic party which is moving left more dysfunctional than ever.

I believe she's CIA too, but that's for another chapter.
I cannot believe the arrogance and utter disrespect she shows toward this man.


harris is more like a small town city counsel person, she's not presidential

She should be mayor of a pot growing town like Santa Barbara.
 
She appeals to Trump haters, freeloaders, illegals, race baiters, and criminals. Kinda like Hillary, only you might not throw up if you saw her naked (but I could be wrong).

Doesn't it strike you as preposterous that someone like you - in every respect repulsive, but particularly so once you open your fat mouth - muses about the looks of others?
 
Why even bring her race into the discussion? Are you trying to provoke?

Because she relies on race to achieve power. Stop trying to gaslight Americans.

Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, Courting Black Support, Pitch Differing Economic Plans

2020 candidates show unity in South Carolina, wooing black voters and easing up on Biden
So because she does it that makes it ok for others to do it? Really, that’s your response?

So any person, or party, who made an appeal to a particular race for votes would be crossing the line right? What about if they established a committee aimed at increasing the turnout of one particular race? Would you have an opinion on that? Would you countenance a response to such actions or advocate a head in the sand approach to such racism?
Or how about gender? How about a man or party which said “we have to get more men voting and more men into positions of power”?
I never said any of that was crossing the line. It’s marketing 101. Target demographics with the most effective messaging. Racism is a completely different thing.

Ahhhh just marketing. Like a corporation. Could you point out some of her “marketing” aimed at whites? Or men?
I’m not a fan of Harris. I see her as an opportunist. I see her overplaying the race card as she attacks Biden. I don’t see her discriminating against whites because she feels like blacks are a superior race.

Why are you asking me to defend Harris btw. That has nothing to do with my initial comment that you engaged with.
 
Criminal prosecutors and politicians all seem to have a few things in common. They're usually highly intelligent and have extensive knowledge of the law, they're fairly good speakers and communicators, and they're very good at lying when needed. But they're not always nasty like Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and some of the other House Democrats were acting toward Attorney General Barr in their recent circus stunt on the Hill.

And it certainly doesn't seem to help their cause now that they've pissed him off, given the new investigation they're very much aware of,. ( although he never once showed it ) But back to Kamala --she definitely has the unnerving Clintonesque disingenuous characteristic that their voters seems to cling to, with a neoliberal corporate agenda that renders the Democratic party which is moving left more dysfunctional than ever.

I believe she's CIA too, but that's for another chapter.
I cannot believe the arrogance and utter disrespect she shows toward this man.


harris is more like a small town city counsel person, she's not presidential

She should be mayor of a pot growing town like Santa Barbara.

Great town... I went to school there
 
Angry Black Woman who thinks she has a chance in hell to be President.

Not going to happen.
Why even bring her race into the discussion? Are you trying to provoke?

Seriously? She is running based on her RACE and GENDER. She is using race as a ploy to advance her career. She knows she has know chance to be President, but this will give her more national recognition. Maybe a cabinet position, VP slot, etc. Although, she saw Hillary do that thinking she'd eventually be Pres by giving up a cushy Senate seat for life in NY. I doubt Harris would give up her cushy Senate seat for a cabinet position.

If she really does think she can be President then Willie Brown did more to her than we already know.
I don’t care what she is doing. Go ahead and critique anything she says that you object to... I object to much of it... but that isn’t a free pass to bring race into a discussion when it has no bearing on what’s being discussed.
Kamala Harris never passes up an opportunity to bring race into everything.
That's why she's a racist.
That makes her an opportunist not a racist. Look up the definitions and start using your words appropriately
A racist uses race as a club to beat anyone they oppose.
 
She's rude, insulting, condescending, hateful, and racist. She likes to be cryptic when she asks a question, says stupid shit like "Think very carefully before you answer", when the question doesn't even make sense. Then when she doesn't get the response she's trying to get, she says something equally stupid like "Ok, I can see you're not going to answer the question". WTF? The woman is an idiot in addition to being a bitch.
She's definitely not a nice person.
 
Criminal prosecutors and politicians all seem to have a few things in common. They're usually highly intelligent and have extensive knowledge of the law, they're fairly good speakers and communicators, and they're very good at lying when needed. But they're not always nasty like Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and some of the other House Democrats were acting toward Attorney General Barr in their recent circus stunt on the Hill.

And it certainly doesn't seem to help their cause now that they've pissed him off, given the new investigation they're very much aware of,. ( although he never once showed it ) But back to Kamala --she definitely has the unnerving Clintonesque disingenuous characteristic that their voters seems to cling to, with a neoliberal corporate agenda that renders the Democratic party which is moving left more dysfunctional than ever.

I believe she's CIA too, but that's for another chapter.
I cannot believe the arrogance and utter disrespect she shows toward this man.


She's not alone, millions of us believe Barr is an ass kissing ambitious jerk who put himself first, and the truth last.

That said, Ms. Harris asked pointed questions, the real asshole was Grassley who committed malfeasance by withholding documents, and providing many less than requested the morning of the confirmation hearing.


Oh, you don't actually believe anything, you are just automatons promoting your party and the march of Socialism.

Lies are the same as truth to you, that which serves the party...


Your first paragraph is a lie, you have no evidence I support Socialism. You use the term as a pejorative and have no understanding of the different iterations of socialism in Asia, in Europe, in S & N. American and in history.

It's Trumpism 101; claim the Democrats are Socialists, Fear Socialism Hate Democrats and don't bother to think.

Rule #1 of the Conservative Wing of the Republican Party: FOLLOW THE LEADER, OR, BE TOSSED UNDER THE BUS AS A RINO/CINO.
 
So because she does it that makes it ok for others to do it? Really, that’s your response?

So any person, or party, who made an appeal to a particular race for votes would be crossing the line right? What about if they established a committee aimed at increasing the turnout of one particular race? Would you have an opinion on that? Would you countenance a response to such actions or advocate a head in the sand approach to such racism?
Or how about gender? How about a man or party which said “we have to get more men voting and more men into positions of power”?
I never said any of that was crossing the line. It’s marketing 101. Target demographics with the most effective messaging. Racism is a completely different thing.

Ahhhh just marketing. Like a corporation. Could you point out some of her “marketing” aimed at whites? Or men?
I’m not a fan of Harris. I see her as an opportunist. I see her overplaying the race card as she attacks Biden. I don’t see her discriminating against whites because she feels like blacks are a superior race.

Why are you asking me to defend Harris btw. That has nothing to do with my initial comment that you engaged with.

Are you intentionally misreading me? And putting words in my mouth? I “engaged” with your attempt at gaslighting. A major political figure, with corporate, media and political class support, is running a racial campaign which you see as so sacrosanct that it can’t even be responded to.
What happened to your “marketing 101”?

And stop worrying about a trap. I’m just asking if you have ever seen this “marketing 101” applied to whites? Or to men? Or is that a code phrase for racial appeals to blacks only?
 
Why even bring her race into the discussion? Are you trying to provoke?

Seriously? She is running based on her RACE and GENDER. She is using race as a ploy to advance her career. She knows she has know chance to be President, but this will give her more national recognition. Maybe a cabinet position, VP slot, etc. Although, she saw Hillary do that thinking she'd eventually be Pres by giving up a cushy Senate seat for life in NY. I doubt Harris would give up her cushy Senate seat for a cabinet position.

If she really does think she can be President then Willie Brown did more to her than we already know.
I don’t care what she is doing. Go ahead and critique anything she says that you object to... I object to much of it... but that isn’t a free pass to bring race into a discussion when it has no bearing on what’s being discussed.
Kamala Harris never passes up an opportunity to bring race into everything.
That's why she's a racist.
That makes her an opportunist not a racist. Look up the definitions and start using your words appropriately
A racist uses race as a club to beat anyone they oppose.
Where’s that in the definition?
 
Criminal prosecutors and politicians all seem to have a few things in common. They're usually highly intelligent and have extensive knowledge of the law, they're fairly good speakers and communicators, and they're very good at lying when needed. But they're not always nasty like Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and some of the other House Democrats were acting toward Attorney General Barr in their recent circus stunt on the Hill.

And it certainly doesn't seem to help their cause now that they've pissed him off, given the new investigation they're very much aware of,. ( although he never once showed it ) But back to Kamala --she definitely has the unnerving Clintonesque disingenuous characteristic that their voters seems to cling to, with a neoliberal corporate agenda that renders the Democratic party which is moving left more dysfunctional than ever.

I believe she's CIA too, but that's for another chapter.
I cannot believe the arrogance and utter disrespect she shows toward this man.


She's not alone, millions of us believe Barr is an ass kissing ambitious jerk who put himself first, and the truth last.

That said, Ms. Harris asked pointed questions, the real asshole was Grassley who committed malfeasance by withholding documents, and providing many less than requested the morning of the confirmation hearing.


Oh, you don't actually believe anything, you are just automatons promoting your party and the march of Socialism.

Lies are the same as truth to you, that which serves the party...


Your first paragraph is a lie, you have no evidence I support Socialism. You use the term as a pejorative and have no understanding of the different iterations of socialism in Asia, in Europe, in S & N. American and in history.

It's Trumpism 101; claim the Democrats are Socialists, Fear Socialism Hate Democrats and don't bother to think.

Rule #1 of the Conservative Wing of the Republican Party: FOLLOW THE LEADER, OR, BE TOSSED UNDER THE BUS AS A RINO/CINO.


Democrats are socialists. It’s that simple. They run socialist candidates. Socialist Party Senators and Congressmen caucus with Democrats in Congress.
 
So because she does it that makes it ok for others to do it? Really, that’s your response?

So any person, or party, who made an appeal to a particular race for votes would be crossing the line right? What about if they established a committee aimed at increasing the turnout of one particular race? Would you have an opinion on that? Would you countenance a response to such actions or advocate a head in the sand approach to such racism?
Or how about gender? How about a man or party which said “we have to get more men voting and more men into positions of power”?
I never said any of that was crossing the line. It’s marketing 101. Target demographics with the most effective messaging. Racism is a completely different thing.

Ahhhh just marketing. Like a corporation. Could you point out some of her “marketing” aimed at whites? Or men?
I’m not a fan of Harris. I see her as an opportunist. I see her overplaying the race card as she attacks Biden. I don’t see her discriminating against whites because she feels like blacks are a superior race.

Why are you asking me to defend Harris btw. That has nothing to do with my initial comment that you engaged with.

Are you intentionally misreading me? And putting words in my mouth? I “engaged” with your attempt at gaslighting. A major political figure, with corporate, media and political class support, is running a racial campaign which you see as so sacrosanct that it can’t even be responded to.
What happened to your “marketing 101”?

And stop worrying about a trap. I’m just asking if you have ever seen this “marketing 101” applied to whites? Or to men? Or is that a code phrase for racial appeals to blacks only?
No I’m not intensionally trying to put words in your mouth. My original post about race had to do with a poster calling Harris an angry Black lady and then another poster saying that she acts white. I was saying that it was not productive to inject race into the conversation like they were doing.

I called Harris an opportunist which is why I’m not a fan of hers.

To answer your questions... the target marketing, I’m talking about is applied mostly to minorities and oppressed groups by the dems and to corporate 1%ers and evangelicals by the Reps.
 
When you say Harris acts white... to me it sounds like you attributing civilized, articulate and intellectual actions as a “white” thing. It sounds textbook racist to me.

Yep. That's very well put. There is another side to it, as indicated by "act", which means that she, being black, isn't really "civilized, articulate and intellectual". That doesn't just "sound", it most definitely IS, racist. Textbook racism.
Agreed. I asked the poster twice to explain what he meant and he did cartwheels to wiggle away from an answer. Then he dodged again when I flat out told him it sounded racist. What a chickenshit

Then why is being harsh on crime painted as being racist?
 
Criminal prosecutors and politicians all seem to have a few things in common. They're usually highly intelligent and have extensive knowledge of the law, they're fairly good speakers and communicators, and they're very good at lying when needed. But they're not always nasty like Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and some of the other House Democrats were acting toward Attorney General Barr in their recent circus stunt on the Hill.

And it certainly doesn't seem to help their cause now that they've pissed him off, given the new investigation they're very much aware of,. ( although he never once showed it ) But back to Kamala --she definitely has the unnerving Clintonesque disingenuous characteristic that their voters seems to cling to, with a neoliberal corporate agenda that renders the Democratic party which is moving left more dysfunctional than ever.

I believe she's CIA too, but that's for another chapter.
I cannot believe the arrogance and utter disrespect she shows toward this man.


She's not alone, millions of us believe Barr is an ass kissing ambitious jerk who put himself first, and the truth last.

That said, Ms. Harris asked pointed questions, the real asshole was Grassley who committed malfeasance by withholding documents, and providing many less than requested the morning of the confirmation hearing.


Oh, you don't actually believe anything, you are just automatons promoting your party and the march of Socialism.

Lies are the same as truth to you, that which serves the party...


Your first paragraph is a lie, you have no evidence I support Socialism. You use the term as a pejorative and have no understanding of the different iterations of socialism in Asia, in Europe, in S & N. American and in history.

It's Trumpism 101; claim the Democrats are Socialists, Fear Socialism Hate Democrats and don't bother to think.

Rule #1 of the Conservative Wing of the Republican Party: FOLLOW THE LEADER, OR, BE TOSSED UNDER THE BUS AS A RINO/CINO.


Democrats are socialists. It’s that simple. They run socialist candidates. Socialist Party Senators and Congressmen caucus with Democrats in Congress.

There are definitely socialist that are Democrats but a democrat is not necessarily a socialist... in fact many of them are not
 

Forum List

Back
Top