What if we had restricted Blacks in America to 2% and no more?

[007]

Democrats are the problem, not Blacks and other minorities.

Republicans are 90% white. Democrats are everyone else. Seems Democrats get along with each other nicely.

Republicans are also 90% American patriots. Democraps are everything else, as in the anti American garbage.

 

[Mojo2]

How about whites in America that can't compete on a somewhat leveled playing field pack up their toys and move here:

Inside South Africa's whites-only town of Orania
In the sparsely populated Karoo desert in the heart of South Africa's Northern Cape, the spirit of apartheid lives on.
BBC News - Inside South Africa s whites-only town of Orania

See Ladies and Gents?

Now he's telling YOU where YOU should escape to if you don't like HIS brethren's toxicity.

That pretty much sums up their attitude.

Your move, Liberal Americans.

Move or stand up for your country and your freedoms?

YES!!!!...YES!!!!..TAKE TO THE STREETS!!!!!
YOU MUST FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOMS!!!!!...WE CAN'T CALL THEM NAMES ANYMORE!!!!!!

Stand up ONLINE.

They want to create a "damned if you do and damned if you don't" dual option.

 

[Mojo2]

How?

I thought America believed in freedom of religion.

We do.

But we also recognize what hell we are guaranteed to experience if Muslims reach the 2% level or higher.

How?

We aren't asking them to stop being Muslim or to change any aspect of their worship.

But America has always used various standards and calculations to determine immigration quotas.

Should for 'the good of the nation' be made an invalid standard?

In this case, yes. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Putting a cap on a religious population within the country would be unconstitutional.

The INS sets quotas all the time using a formula or set of guidelines that can easily accommodate keeping people from certain nations to a minimum.

See, nothing about religion.

Chill out.

Besides, why are you so anxious to have Muslim toxicity visited on US?

What have we ever done to you?

 

[Mojo2]

What if we had restricted Blacks in America to 2% and no more?.

Clueless, bigoted bastards would have to find something else to moan about.
Sorted - any other questions?

Why do you think you can get away with flooding this country with Muslims which WILL UNAVOIDABLY include 15 - 30% radicals?

 

[Mojo2]

blacks 16-26 make up about 3% of the pop. They make up 50% off all crime/murders.

And THEM we can't restrict.



But THESE we can.

 

[Toro]

How?

I thought America believed in freedom of religion.

We do.

But we also recognize what hell we are guaranteed to experience if Muslims reach the 2% level or higher.

How?

We aren't asking them to stop being Muslim or to change any aspect of their worship.

But America has always used various standards and calculations to determine immigration quotas.

Should for 'the good of the nation' be made an invalid standard?

In this case, yes. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Putting a cap on a religious population within the country would be unconstitutional.

The INS sets quotas all the time using a formula or set of guidelines that can easily accommodate keeping people from certain nations to a minimum.

See, nothing about religion.

Chill out.

Besides, why are you so anxious to have Muslim toxicity visited on US?

What have we ever done to you?

It is unconstitutional to implicitly or explicitly limit the practice of religion.

Why do you hate the constitution and freedom?

Are you a communist?

 

[Mojo2]

We do.

But we also recognize what hell we are guaranteed to experience if Muslims reach the 2% level or higher.

How?

We aren't asking them to stop being Muslim or to change any aspect of their worship.

But America has always used various standards and calculations to determine immigration quotas.

Should for 'the good of the nation' be made an invalid standard?

In this case, yes. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Putting a cap on a religious population within the country would be unconstitutional.

The INS sets quotas all the time using a formula or set of guidelines that can easily accommodate keeping people from certain nations to a minimum.

See, nothing about religion.

Chill out.

Besides, why are you so anxious to have Muslim toxicity visited on US?

What have we ever done to you?

It is unconstitutional to implicitly or explicitly limit the practice of religion.

Why do you hate the constitution and freedom?

Are you a communist?

NOPE.

But it seems we have unearthed a mole.

You are outed, Toro.

 

[007]

We do.

But we also recognize what hell we are guaranteed to experience if Muslims reach the 2% level or higher.

How?

We aren't asking them to stop being Muslim or to change any aspect of their worship.

But America has always used various standards and calculations to determine immigration quotas.

Should for 'the good of the nation' be made an invalid standard?

In this case, yes. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Putting a cap on a religious population within the country would be unconstitutional.

The INS sets quotas all the time using a formula or set of guidelines that can easily accommodate keeping people from certain nations to a minimum.

See, nothing about religion.

Chill out.

Besides, why are you so anxious to have Muslim toxicity visited on US?

What have we ever done to you?

It is unconstitutional to implicitly or explicitly limit the practice of religion.

Why do you hate the constitution and freedom?

Are you a communist?

You like sharia law?

 

[Two Thumbs]

....um

Do you mean we should have limited the number that we kidnapped and imported as free labor, or sterilized them to prevent them from breeding?

This thread is mind blowing.

We didn't kidnap anyone.

true story

If you want to be pedantic, sure. Do you think the somehow makes it better?

adding a lie to someones bs didnt help either

 

[Two Thumbs]

....um

Do you mean we should have limited the number that we kidnapped and imported as free labor, or sterilized them to prevent them from breeding?

This thread is mind blowing.

We didn't kidnap anyone.

true story

right, uh huh,

we were just the drug users and not the drug dealers....is that what you are saying, in so many words?

And our demand for slaves didn't have anything to do with the increased supply?

Slaves were kidnapped in Africa by Africans, very true, but they did so for our, and other nationalities demand....to fill our demand for them 2 thumbs....

So, both evils, were truly intertwined imho.

not by anymeans is it the same, not even close

 

[Toro]

How?

We aren't asking them to stop being Muslim or to change any aspect of their worship.

But America has always used various standards and calculations to determine immigration quotas.

Should for 'the good of the nation' be made an invalid standard?

In this case, yes. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Putting a cap on a religious population within the country would be unconstitutional.

The INS sets quotas all the time using a formula or set of guidelines that can easily accommodate keeping people from certain nations to a minimum.

See, nothing about religion.

Chill out.

Besides, why are you so anxious to have Muslim toxicity visited on US?

What have we ever done to you?

It is unconstitutional to implicitly or explicitly limit the practice of religion.

Why do you hate the constitution and freedom?

Are you a communist?

NOPE.

But it seems we have unearthed a mole.

You are outed, Toro.

I also think we've unearthed a mole. A communist mole who hates America!

CommunistMolo2

 

[rdean]

....um

Do you mean we should have limited the number that we kidnapped and imported as free labor, or sterilized them to prevent them from breeding?

This thread is mind blowing.

We didn't kidnap anyone.

true story

right, uh huh,

we were just the drug users and not the drug dealers....is that what you are saying, in so many words?

And our demand for slaves didn't have anything to do with the increased supply?

Slaves were kidnapped in Africa by Africans, very true, but they did so for our, and other nationalities demand....to fill our demand for them 2 thumbs....

So, both evils, were truly intertwined imho.

At its height slave owning was only practiced by 2% of Americans.

And Blacks also owned slaves in America.

The first American slave owner recorded was himself Black and so was his slave.

BTW, here's an interesting bit of info.

The Portuguese were the first to engage in the New World slave trade in the 16th century, and others soon followed. Ship owners considered the slaves as cargo to be transported to the Americas as quickly and cheaply as possible,[2] there to be sold to labour in coffee, tobacco, cocoa, sugar and cotton plantations, gold and silver mines, rice fields, construction industry, cutting timber for ships, in skilled labour, and as domestic servants.

The first Africans imported to the English colonies were classified as "indentured servants", like workers coming from England, and also, "apprentices for life".

By the middle of the 17th century, slavery had hardened as a racial caste;

they and their offspring were legally the property of their owners, and children born to slave mothers were slaves. As property, the people were considered merchandise or units of labour, and were sold at markets with other goods and services.

The Atlantic slave traders, ordered by trade volume, were: the Portuguese, the British, the French, the Spanish, the Dutch Empire, and the United States.

Several had established outposts on the African coast where they purchased slaves from local African leaders.[3] Current estimates are that about 12 million Africans were shipped across the Atlantic,[4] although the number purchased by the traders is considerably higher.[5][6][7]
​

Atlantic slave trade - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

So you are saying slavery is a "good thing". Strange.

 

[reconmark]

How about whites in America that can't compete on a somewhat leveled playing field pack up their toys and move here:

Inside South Africa's whites-only town of Orania
In the sparsely populated Karoo desert in the heart of South Africa's Northern Cape, the spirit of apartheid lives on.
BBC News - Inside South Africa s whites-only town of Orania

See Ladies and Gents?

Now he's telling YOU where YOU should escape to if you don't like HIS brethren's toxicity.

That pretty much sums up their attitude.

Your move, Liberal Americans.

Move or stand up for your country and your freedoms?

YES!!!!...YES!!!!..TAKE TO THE STREETS!!!!!
YOU MUST FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOMS!!!!!...WE CAN'T CALL THEM NAMES ANYMORE!!!!!!

Stand up ONLINE.

They want to create a "damned if you do and damned if you don't" dual option.

YES!!!...YES!!!!...BROTHER, WE MUST GET STORM FRONT ACCOUNTS RIGHT AWAY!!!!!

 

[Mojo2]

How about whites in America that can't compete on a somewhat leveled playing field pack up their toys and move here:

Inside South Africa's whites-only town of Orania
In the sparsely populated Karoo desert in the heart of South Africa's Northern Cape, the spirit of apartheid lives on.
BBC News - Inside South Africa s whites-only town of Orania

See Ladies and Gents?

Now he's telling YOU where YOU should escape to if you don't like HIS brethren's toxicity.

That pretty much sums up their attitude.

Your move, Liberal Americans.

Move or stand up for your country and your freedoms?

YES!!!!...YES!!!!..TAKE TO THE STREETS!!!!!
YOU MUST FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOMS!!!!!...WE CAN'T CALL THEM NAMES ANYMORE!!!!!!

Stand up ONLINE.

They want to create a "damned if you do and damned if you don't" dual option.

YES!!!...YES!!!!...BROTHER, WE MUST GET STORM FRONT ACCOUNTS RIGHT AWAY!!!!!

Nope. Sorry.

 

[Mojo2]

....um

Do you mean we should have limited the number that we kidnapped and imported as free labor, or sterilized them to prevent them from breeding?

This thread is mind blowing.

We didn't kidnap anyone.

true story

right, uh huh,

we were just the drug users and not the drug dealers....is that what you are saying, in so many words?

And our demand for slaves didn't have anything to do with the increased supply?

Slaves were kidnapped in Africa by Africans, very true, but they did so for our, and other nationalities demand....to fill our demand for them 2 thumbs....

So, both evils, were truly intertwined imho.

At its height slave owning was only practiced by 2% of Americans.

And Blacks also owned slaves in America.

The first American slave owner recorded was himself Black and so was his slave.

BTW, here's an interesting bit of info.

The Portuguese were the first to engage in the New World slave trade in the 16th century, and others soon followed. Ship owners considered the slaves as cargo to be transported to the Americas as quickly and cheaply as possible,[2] there to be sold to labour in coffee, tobacco, cocoa, sugar and cotton plantations, gold and silver mines, rice fields, construction industry, cutting timber for ships, in skilled labour, and as domestic servants.

The first Africans imported to the English colonies were classified as "indentured servants", like workers coming from England, and also, "apprentices for life".

By the middle of the 17th century, slavery had hardened as a racial caste;

they and their offspring were legally the property of their owners, and children born to slave mothers were slaves. As property, the people were considered merchandise or units of labour, and were sold at markets with other goods and services.

The Atlantic slave traders, ordered by trade volume, were: the Portuguese, the British, the French, the Spanish, the Dutch Empire, and the United States.

Several had established outposts on the African coast where they purchased slaves from local African leaders.[3] Current estimates are that about 12 million Africans were shipped across the Atlantic,[4] although the number purchased by the traders is considerably higher.[5][6][7]
​

Atlantic slave trade - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

So you are saying slavery is a "good thing". Strange.

No, but a bunch of Muslims apparently think so.

October 30th, 2014
11:20 AM ET

'Treated like cattle': Yazidi women sold, raped, enslaved by ISIS
By Ivan Watson

Jana was a 19-year-old in her final year of high school, with dreams of becoming a doctor. Then, ISIS came to her village last August.

She described to me in chilling detail, how the jihadis first demanded that members of her Yazidi religious minority convert to Islam. Then they stripped villagers of their jewelry, money and cellphones. They separated the men from the women.

A United Nations report explained what happened next. ISIS "gathered all the males older than 10 years of age at the local school, took them outside the village by pick-up trucks, and shot them."

Among those believed dead were Jana's father and eldest brother.

A different fate lay in store for the women.

FULL STORY

Treated like cattle Yazidi women sold raped enslaved by ISIS 8211 The CNN Freedom Project Ending Modern-Day Slavery - CNN.com Blogs

 

[reconmark]

How about whites in America that can't compete on a somewhat leveled playing field pack up their toys and move here:

Inside South Africa's whites-only town of Orania
In the sparsely populated Karoo desert in the heart of South Africa's Northern Cape, the spirit of apartheid lives on.
BBC News - Inside South Africa s whites-only town of Orania

See Ladies and Gents?

Now he's telling YOU where YOU should escape to if you don't like HIS brethren's toxicity.

That pretty much sums up their attitude.

Your move, Liberal Americans.

Move or stand up for your country and your freedoms?

YES!!!!...YES!!!!..TAKE TO THE STREETS!!!!!
YOU MUST FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOMS!!!!!...WE CAN'T CALL THEM NAMES ANYMORE!!!!!!

Stand up ONLINE.

They want to create a "damned if you do and damned if you don't" dual option.

YES!!!...YES!!!!...BROTHER, WE MUST GET STORM FRONT ACCOUNTS RIGHT AWAY!!!!!

Nope. Sorry.

Well then brother...what do we do, where online do we stand up???

 

[Indofred]

It is unconstitutional to implicitly or explicitly limit the practice of religion.

Why do you hate the constitution and freedom?

Are you a communist?

The constitution doesn't matter when you're defending America against it.
That paper was clearly written by left wing, Marxists who wanted to destroy the United states.
Well, it was when the constitution gets in the way of defending the constitution.

 

[JoeB131]

when I see Mojo Write, all i can think of is...