Zone1 What if muslims rule the whole world again

[Lockback]

You mean the way Iran murdered 400000 of its own people and raped women murdered children and strangled babies. That Islam

Yep.
That Islam.

 

[PeterPilot]

How completely absurd.

Too damn true for ya, eh Lockback?

While the Zionists are raping, pillaging and sniping children, the Muslims are simply returning fire to those attacking them.

 

[PeterPilot]

You mean the way Iran murdered 400000 of its own people and raped women murdered children and strangled babies. That Islam

It sounds like you're describing Bibi's Sampson Option.....

 

[Lockback]

Too damn true for ya, eh Lockback?

While the Zionists are raping, pillaging and sniping children, the Muslims are simply returning fire to those attacking them.

Sure.
Whatever you say, Jew hater.

 

[Lisa558]

Too damn true for ya, eh Lockback?

While the Zionists are raping, pillaging and sniping children, the Muslims are simply returning fire to those attacking them.

OMG. Could this antisemitic Muslim from the UK possibly GET any more ironic?

 

[ding]

Too convenient.

No. We live in a Darwinian world driven by the satisfaction of material needs and primitive impulses. All wars are Darwinian.

Thomas Paine noted centuries ago that "It is from the bible that man has learned cruelty, rapine and murder, for the belief in a cruel god makes a cruel man"

Thomas Paine didn't understand how to read the OT. Ancient Israelites crafted narratives of historical events to teach lessons about the covenant, obedience and justice. If Thomas wants to blame cruelty on anyone he should direct it at the Israelites and not God.

 

[PeterPilot]

No. We live in a Darwinian world driven by the satisfaction of material needs and primitive impulses. All wars are Darwinian.

Thomas Paine didn't understand how to read the OT. Ancient Israelites crafted narratives of historical events to teach lessons about the covenant, obedience and justice. If Thomas wants to blame cruelty on anyone he should direct it at the Israelites and not God.

Darwin's theory has been rendered invalid by later discoveries, modern discoveries. Are you still living in 1850?

Thomas Paine will speak for himself. Your claim that he didn't know how to read suggests you are thoroughly indoctrinated by religious psychobabble.

The Lord mentioned in the Torah/OT, for example in Genesis, Deuteronomy, Samuel and others sounds like a Dark Lord. How do you rationalize that?

 

[ding]

Darwin's theory has been rendered invalid by later discoveries, modern discoveries. Are you still living in 1850?

No. I'm not.

Modern discoveries have not rendered Darwin's theory invalid; instead, they have fundamentally confirmed, expanded, and updated it. While some of his original specific mechanisms were incomplete or incorrect, his core principles remain the foundational framework of modern biology.

Darwin did not know about genes or DNA, so he struggled to explain how traits were inherited and varied. The discovery of DNA (and the synthesis of genetics with evolutionary theory) filled this major gap, confirming that heritable variations arise from genetic mutations.

Darwin believed that evolution was strictly a slow, gradual process. We now know about processes like genetic drift and horizontal gene transfer, showing that evolutionary changes can sometimes be rapid or skip traditional ancestral lines.

Darwin's initial theory of "pangenesis" (the idea that cells from all over the body gather to form reproductive cells) was proven wrong, as traits are passed through discrete units of DNA (Mendel's laws of inheritance).

The central idea that organisms best adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce remains completely intact. Darwin worried about a lack of transitional fossils, but the discovery of millions of fossils since his time has overwhelmingly filled in these gaps, confirming the predicted pathways of evolution. Modern genome sequencing has verified that all living things share a common ancestry, exactly as Darwin originally hypothesized.

Thomas Paine will speak for himself. Your claim that he didn't know how to read suggests you are thoroughly indoctrinated by religious psychobabble.

Anyone who reads the OT and concludes that God condones violence and hatred is ipso facto reading those accounts wrong.

The Lord mentioned in the Torah/OT, for example in Genesis, Deuteronomy, Samuel and others sounds like a Dark Lord. How do you rationalize that?

You are reading it wrong. I already explained how in post #86. Ancient Israelites crafted narratives of historical events to teach lessons about the covenant, obedience and justice. If you want to conclude God is a dark lord maybe you should direct that at the Israelites and not God.