What If A Country Was Based On Critical Race Theory.

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Of course, that is the aim of our Democrats/Progressives.


1. Here is the lens through which to view the idea:
Their motivation in all venues, all institutions, all values and traditions is simply this: destroy.

Destroy all that is, to create their imaginary Utopia.
They desire to destroy all tradition, values, and attitudes, beginning with morality, and the family, and build their imagined Utopia here on earth.

"In this particular idea of the Enlightenment, the need to change human nature, and to eliminate customs and traditions, to remake established institutions, to do away with all inequalities in order to bring man closer to the state, which was the expression of the general will."
Talmon, “Origins of Totalitarian Democracy,” p. 3-7




2. "
REVOLVER: SOUTH AFRICA — THE FIRST COUNTRY BUILT ON “CRITICAL RACE THEORY” — OFFICIALLY IMPLODES
South Africa is disintegrating.

After the jailing of Jacob Zuma, supporters of the former president took to the streets, ostensibly to protest but actually to simply plunder at will. The official death toll already runs into the dozens, but in a country as violent as South Africa (57 murders a day) the real toll will likely never be known for certain.


3.





4. The meltdown in South Africa isn’t a natural disaster or a random fluke. It’s a choice. South Africa was the first modern nation to be refounded on the anti-white principles of critical race theory, and now it is reaping the whirlwind of that choice.

South Africa did everything that is being done in America right now. As a hyperdiverse multiethnic, multilingual society, South Africa has followed almost every prescription embraced by the globalist ruling class.


5. Despite being the “economic superpower” of Sub-Saharan Africa, South Africa’s brain drain is significant and accelerating. Those who have options are abandoning the country. More than four percent of all deaths are murders, and the murder rate is somehow still rising; last year it rose by 8.4 percent. But it’s not just about day-to-day violence. It’s the expectation for what is to come.

The Economic Freedom Fighters vow to seize white-owned land (without payment), nationalize the banking and mining sectors, and double welfare payments.
But EFF isn’t a radical outlier in South African politics. It’s the natural endgame for the country’s post-apartheid ideology. For decades, the South African economy has been shaped by a policy known as Broad Based Black Economic Employment. Despite its name, there is nothing “based” about BBBEE. Instead, the policy uses the same tactics to achieve “equity” that activists in the United States are demanding.
BBBEE relies openly and explicitly on injecting racial preferences throughout the economy. Companies receive a BBBEE scorecard based on hiring black workers, elevating black management, and giving black South Africans a share of ownership. Companies with high BBBEE scores are given favorable tax treatment and preferences in government contracts. Corporate actors are strongly incentivized to give contracts to high BBBEE scorers as well.


6. The results are predictable. Remember those rolling blackouts Revolver mentioned above? Eskom, South Africa’s public electric utility company, is one of the most aggressive adopters of BBBEE. South African National Assemblywoman Gwen Ngwenya described the outcome of this approach in a 2019 column:
Why is Eskom in trouble? Because it has high operating costs and it cannot meet its debt obligations. Why? It’s ambitious programme to build two big power stations has incurred substantial cost overruns and technical faults. Why? In part it was flawed from the beginning with a small bidding pool, meaning it was likely not cost competitive from the start. Why? There was political meddling. Why? Chancellor House. Why? Contractors needed to have a black partner in order to secure contracts. Why? BEE. [PoliticsWeb.za]



In her column, Ngwenya explains how BBBEE has fueled the decay of South Africa’s power utility at every step of the process. The country has two expensive, botched power plants because Hitachi’s African subsidiary secured contracts based on black empowerment criteria rather than actual expertise. Eskom has problems with coal supply because it gave favoritism to black-owned mining companies, and even pushed foreign firms to divest from the country. In one case, the CEO of Wescoal resigned his position solely because having a white CEO hindered the company’s ability to compete in South Africa."



If you voted Democrat......

.....this is the future you voted for.
 
It's funny how racism over the past 8 to 10 years had been becoming less and less an issue in general. Then suddenly less than 2 years ago it exploded and became more of an issue than it had ever been before. And to top it off anti racists have become the most racist people this country has ever seen.
 
There's a difference between leftist and Liberal. I am praying that our fellow posters here are primarily LIBERALS. We may have differences but conservatives and liberals desire a free and strong nation with strong borders and fair immigration policies. NOT authoritarian rule, NOT socialism. And don't tell me that liberals do not see value in capitalism. Do we not?
 
It's funny how racism over the past 8 to 10 years had been becoming less and less an issue in general. Then suddenly less than 2 years ago it exploded and became more of an issue than it had ever been before. And to top it off anti racists have become the most racist people this country has ever seen.
How many people have anti-racists hanged, burned crosses to or even threatened with death?

You white supremacists are truly walking POS.
 
There's a difference between leftist and Liberal. I am praying that our fellow posters here are primarily LIBERALS. We may have differences but conservatives and liberals desire a free and strong nation with strong borders and fair immigration policies. NOT authoritarian rule, NOT socialism. And don't tell me that liberals do not see value in capitalism. Do we not?
Define socialism.
 
There's a difference between leftist and Liberal. I am praying that our fellow posters here are primarily LIBERALS. We may have differences but conservatives and liberals desire a free and strong nation with strong borders and fair immigration policies. NOT authoritarian rule, NOT socialism. And don't tell me that liberals do not see value in capitalism. Do we not?


"There's a difference between leftist and Liberal."


I wish.


It is not true, and will not be as long as the sub-groups you named vote Democrat.


And....they do.
 
SA is in horrible shape. I recommend all the whites arm up or leave.
That is, if they have anything left. Or they are still alive...
I will never understand why the answer to oppression is more oppression.
 
It's funny how racism over the past 8 to 10 years had been becoming less and less an issue in general. Then suddenly less than 2 years ago it exploded and became more of an issue than it had ever been before. And to top it off anti racists have become the most racist people this country has ever seen.
Uhm....i beg to differ, it was when the brown turd Obammy took office that racial strife escalated 10 fold. That is because like good Marxists you have to divide the country before you can take it over...
 
SA is in horrible shape. I recommend all the whites arm up or leave.
That is, if they have anything left. Or they are still alive...
I will never understand why the answer to oppression is more oppression.


I cry when I see the same policies advanced by the Democrats, and anticipate the same fate for our once great nation.
 
Just think if they created a country that claims all that reside in it are free, unless you are not a white...
 
Oh yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
To you a stupid progressive slave, that went right over your peabrain head. To people who have intelligence they know the end result of Socialism. Always ends in disaster...



Why Socialism Often Leads to Tyranny. Socialism and communism lead to underperforming economies and the loss of individual opportunity for generations. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence that communism leads to tyranny. Mention the countries North Korea, Cuba, the Soviet Union, Mao Tse Tung’s China, East Germany, and Venezuela, and most people immediately think of an oppressed population with almost no economic opportunity and no political freedom.

Why Socialism Often Leads to Tyranny - Foundation for ...


fee.org/articles/why-socialism-often-leads-to-tyranny/
 
To you a stupid progressive slave, that went right over your peabrain head. To people who have intelligence they know the end result of Socialism. Always ends in disaster...



Why Socialism Often Leads to Tyranny. Socialism and communism lead to underperforming economies and the loss of individual opportunity for generations. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence that communism leads to tyranny. Mention the countries North Korea, Cuba, the Soviet Union, Mao Tse Tung’s China, East Germany, and Venezuela, and most people immediately think of an oppressed population with almost no economic opportunity and no political freedom.

Why Socialism Often Leads to Tyranny - Foundation for ...


fee.org/articles/why-socialism-often-leads-to-tyranny/
Post the definition, you moron!
 

Forum List

Back
Top