1. Why is it that we should not hold all Muslims to blame for a few lunatic few terrorists by forcibly screeing them in any way, but we should hold all gun owners suspect of being guilty until proven innocent with various screening processes because of a few lunatic domestic terrorists?
Here's the thing. We ARE screening Muslims coming in from other countries. Most of the terrorist attacks being carried out on American Soil are by American-born Muslims who were - wait for it - able to get a gun they shouldn't have had.
The thing is, every time we have a mass shooting, within days, we find out that the shooter - Lanza, Loughner, Holmes, Mercer - was some kind of dangerous lunatic that everyone in their lives knew was nuts. the thing is, we don't have effective screenings if such obviously damaged people are able to get guns.
2, Why is it that we should trust the police and the military with guns more than the average citizen?
Because the police and military have been trained, are under a command structure that demands accountability, and are answerable for their actions. You know, "Well Regulated'.
As opposed to guys like Lanza, Loughner, Holmes, Mercer, who are just dangerous lunatics.
3. When you finally get a lib stooge on the Supreme Court to rip up the 2nd Amendment, only needing one more after Scalia died, how will you round up all the guns?
Well, first, I don't think you will see a comprehensive gun ban from SCOTUS. They will just reset the clock back to pre-Heller where states and cities can regulate guns.
second, long term, your gun culture IS dying. Only 22% of Americans own guns. That's down from 35% in 1970.