320 Years of History
Gold Member
well informed, mature and adept critical thinkers
Children.
??? I have no idea what your one word reply in your mind means with regard to the passage you quoted.
You mentioned that you would take the "other" approach, that of assuming there were no children involved or to be involved in these posts; that children were indeed misinformed, underdeveloped, and frail thinkers, therefore requiring the "otherly", but "also (two times) inappropriate" alternative measure.
I retained what was important in your post, and prompted by your confusion cleared the prospecting presentation of my previous post which had not been fully comprehended.
Is it clear now?
I should have included the abbreviation "i.e.", or the words and the comma "that is," for ready literati ease, but the effect of making sure the previous message had been comprehended would perhaps not be the same.
Red:
Not entirely, but I've also decided I don't care if it is not at this point.
Do you still care for the OP's topic, or do you think that discussion has also already reached its determining end?
I don't know; I haven't given that any thought. For now, all I know is after having read your clarification (I appreciate the effort you showed by providing it) I didn't fully understand what the clarification meant, and given that and the relative unimportance of the my "initial" comment, I have decided I don't care whether I fully comprehend the initial response ("children") or the clarification. My life just won't be incomplete without my "getting it."