What happens if you track climate against the claims?

[Captain Caveman]

Well, Google will demonetise you. A NASA meteorologist has found that observations are at the bottom end of the climate model predictions.

So it confirms that climate science is just political science and nothing more.

So is NASA and Dr. Spencer wrong?

 

[1srelluc]

If they quit picking our pockets over the whole thing....

 

[toobfreak]

Well, Google will demonetise you. A NASA meteorologist has found that observations are at the bottom end of the climate model predictions.

Apparently Google has better climate scientists working for it than NASA.

So it confirms that climate science is just political science and nothing more.

I thought that was already a given when several years ago, a bunch of climate-mongers in Europe were busted after it was found in their email between each other that they admitted they were fudging the data picking only supporting evidence and rejecting all evidence which did not promote their climate change theory.

 

[EMH]

satellites and balloons raw data always showed no warming.

Dr. Spencer accepted the 2005 fudge job but won't ever defend it, rather simply pretends it never happened...

Dr. Spencer was "gotten to."

Who enforces CO2 FRAUD "purity?"

A - the Mossad

 

[elektra]

I follow Dr. Spencer on Facebook.
A very common sense man

 

[Captain Caveman]

I follow Dr. Spencer on Facebook.
A very common sense man

A few years ago, I copied this quote -

Anthropogenic origin of global warming is an unproven conjecture because it's just based on general circulation models (complex computer programs in laymen terms).

And Dr. Spencer has proven computer models are not science. All -ologists just record and show the scientific data, whereas climate scientists make predictions and palm it off as scientific data. Then they back it up to try and fool people by claiming, "Scientist consensus". Unfortunately, the gullible fall for it.

 

[EMH]

A few years ago, I copied this quote -

Anthropogenic origin of global warming is an unproven conjecture because it's just based on general circulation models (complex computer programs in laymen terms).

And Dr. Spencer has proven computer models are not science. All -ologists just record and show the scientific data, whereas climate scientists make predictions and palm it off as scientific data. Then they back it up to try and fool people by claiming, "Scientist consensus". Unfortunately, the gullible fall for it.

"climate scientists" take data showing NO WARMING and FUDGE IT to show "warming" that does not exist.


And yes, their predictions have all been proven false....

 

[ding]

"climate scientists" take data showing NO WARMING and FUDGE IT to show "warming" that does not exist.


And yes, their predictions have all been proven false....

Glad to hear you say that, Apu, even if you are over exaggerating it.

 

[Robert W]

And yes, their predictions have all been proven false....

Not close to all. Many Climate scientists spend a lot of time debunking the Democrats claims.

 

[jc456]

View attachment 1060813


Well, Google will demonetise you. A NASA meteorologist has found that observations are at the bottom end of the climate model predictions.

So it confirms that climate science is just political science and nothing more.

So is NASA and Dr. Spencer wrong?

Musk Tesla says it loud

 

[Sunsettommy]

It is leftists who are pushing the climate change scam a sign of mental illness when they go on and on and on demonizing a trace gas with a trace IR absorption effect even to say it is a pollutant.

They are insane!

 

[Robert W]

It is leftists who are pushing the climate change scam a sign of mental illness when they go on and on and on demonizing a trace gas with a trace IR absorption effect even to say it is a pollutant.

They are insane!

Democrats seem to want plants to be extinct.