What Happens if the Electoral College Goes Rogue?

You and the rest of the loony left didn't seem to care when the electoral college failed to stopa know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House in both 2008 and 2012 so forgive me for calling bullshit on your phony hysterics. As someone said elections have consequences and at the end of the day I won.
It's amazing these people keep claiming fascist while trying to shove a candidate nobody wants for President up our asses. Fascist means what now?
 
You and the rest of the loony left didn't seem to care when the electoral college failed to stopa know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House in both 2008 and 2012 so forgive me for calling bullshit on your phony hysterics. As someone said elections have consequences and at the end of the day I won.
It's amazing these people keep claiming fascist while trying to shove a candidate nobody wants for President up our asses. Fascist means what now?

"Nobody wants." Do I need to remind your stupid ass that Hillary got nearly 3 million more votes than your guy?
 
Where are the Libertarians like kaz on this, since they all cherish and revere the Federalist papers so much, and constantly cite them? Federalist #68 clearly encourages electors to vote against the popular wish if they deem the president-elect as unfit for the office, based on a variety of benchmarks.
 
Where are the Libertarians like kaz on this, since they all cherish and revere the Federalist papers so much, and constantly cite them? Federalist #68 clearly encourages electors to vote against the popular wish if they deem the president-elect as unfit for the office, based on a variety of benchmarks.

Exactly. It's literally in their job description to prevent a man like Trump from being sworn in.

DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS ELECTORS.
 
You and the rest of the loony left didn't seem to care when the electoral college failed to stopa know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House in both 2008 and 2012 so forgive me for calling bullshit on your phony hysterics. As someone said elections have consequences and at the end of the day I won.
It's amazing these people keep claiming fascist while trying to shove a candidate nobody wants for President up our asses. Fascist means what now?

"Nobody wants." Do I need to remind your stupid ass that Hillary got nearly 3 million more votes than your guy?
:lmao:
Shit for brains, more people in more states voted for trump.
Progressives still don't understand that the electoral college determines who becomes president…
 
Given the huge gap in electoral votes, it is unlikely that enough electors will be faithless. You also have to consider the fact that all the electors you would need to turn are Republican, since that's how the system works.

There will definitely be more faithless electors this election than any other though.
 
You and the rest of the loony left didn't seem to care when the electoral college failed to stopa know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House in both 2008 and 2012 so forgive me for calling bullshit on your phony hysterics. As someone said elections have consequences and at the end of the day I won.
It's amazing these people keep claiming fascist while trying to shove a candidate nobody wants for President up our asses. Fascist means what now?

"Nobody wants." Do I need to remind your stupid ass that Hillary got nearly 3 million more votes than your guy?
You may have not noticed this but no matter how many Californians voted for the pig doesn't mean she won. Nobody wants the vote changed that actually matters. Check a map. It's been a pretty good few weeks for the fly over people.
 
Exactly. It's literally in their job description to prevent a man like Trump from being sworn in.

DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS ELECTORS.

The electors were nominated by their political party because they would support the presidential candidate. That is why faithless electors are so rare.
 

I don't believe enough of them have the balls to go rogue - but I certainly hope I'm wrong. I prefer Hillary - but anyone but Trump!

If they don't, then they are COMPLETELY useless and are no longer relevant. They better step up to the plate and do the very thing they were designed to do in the first place -- prevent a know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House -- or the EC has got to go.
Crying from an idiot. You are retarded.
 
Faithless electors belong at club gitmo....

You realize that the electoral college was created specifically with faithless electors in mind?

They were supposed to serve as a check and balance. The founding fathers believed the majority was too stupid to completely elect their own rulers.
 
Exactly. It's literally in their job description to prevent a man like Trump from being sworn in.

DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS ELECTORS.

The electors were nominated by their political party because they would support the presidential candidate. That is why faithless electors are so rare.
When were these electors chosen? Before or after Trump was confirmed to be the nominee? Because if it was after and dems are claiming they won't vote for him that's complete bullshit. They became electors knowing full well Trump was going to be who they voted for if he won their state.
 
You and the rest of the loony left didn't seem to care when the electoral college failed to stopa know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House in both 2008 and 2012 so forgive me for calling bullshit on your phony hysterics. As someone said elections have consequences and at the end of the day I won.
It's amazing these people keep claiming fascist while trying to shove a candidate nobody wants for President up our asses. Fascist means what now?

"Nobody wants." Do I need to remind your stupid ass that Hillary got nearly 3 million more votes than your guy?
How many times do we need to remind your stupid ass Presidential elections are not decided by the popular vote? FYI that did not just start this year
 
When were these electors chosen? Before or after Trump was confirmed to be the nominee?

At the same time during the party convention. It hardly matters though.

Since the electors are Republican, their chances of supporting the other parties candidate over their own is low.
 
Where are the Libertarians like kaz on this, since they all cherish and revere the Federalist papers so much, and constantly cite them? Federalist #68 clearly encourages electors to vote against the popular wish if they deem the president-elect as unfit for the office, based on a variety of benchmarks.

Exactly. It's literally in their job description to prevent a man like Trump from being sworn in.

DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS ELECTORS.

Dems electors need to undo the disaster that was Hillary -- Vote for Bernie
 
Another Shit Feces whinning and crying thread because he is a butt hurt Fageral!

You asshole, NOTHING can change that Fact!

^ This guy's having a hissy fit, because deep down he knows that he elected a clown into the White House
 
You and the rest of the loony left didn't seem to care when the electoral college failed to stopa know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House in both 2008 and 2012 so forgive me for calling bullshit on your phony hysterics. As someone said elections have consequences and at the end of the day I won.
It's amazing these people keep claiming fascist while trying to shove a candidate nobody wants for President up our asses. Fascist means what now?

"Nobody wants." Do I need to remind your stupid ass that Hillary got nearly 3 million more votes than your guy?

How many more electoral votes did she get?
 

I don't believe enough of them have the balls to go rogue - but I certainly hope I'm wrong. I prefer Hillary - but anyone but Trump!

If they don't, then they are COMPLETELY useless and are no longer relevant. They better step up to the plate and do the very thing they were designed to do in the first place -- prevent a know-nothing dangerous fascist from infecting the White House -- or the EC has got to go.
So, if they do not agree with you then they are useless?

That is an awfully arrogant stance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top