What ever happened to that ridiculous climate change hoax.

[EMH]

No one single piece of evidence

600 miles to the pole is that one piece of evidence, and nobody can refute it.

 

[EMH]

Rocks, and direct evidence on the surface on the rocks.

Glacial striations are true data. Drumlins are true data. Loess deposits are true data. Evidence like that leaves physical proof on the surface of the planet.

Proxy data is indirect. Yes, it shows "Something Happened", but it does not show the actual extent of the actual event because it is all second hand.

Think of it like the K-T Boundary. Palentologists knew for over a century that something happened some 65 mya, as at one point in the fossil record there were dinosaurs, and then there were no dinosaurs. Then in 1980 they discovered the "K-T Boundary", a layer of mostly iridium that was left globally that marks the line before one era and the other. Below the K-T, Dinosaurs. Above the K-T, no dinosaurs.

That was hard evidence, but said nothing more than it was a meteor. It was over a decade later that the Chicxulub Crater was discovered. And if that impact had happened in the deep ocean instead of a shallow sea, there would not have even been that much hard evidence left behind.

Why does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9+ times the ice of the other, the Arctic?

 

[ding]

why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland, but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska

Greenland hosts massive ice sheets due to its vast landmass in the Arctic, proximity to moisture-laden North Atlantic currents (like a branch of the Gulf Stream), and lower summer melt, while interior Alaska remained largely ice-free during the last Ice Age because the Brooks Range created a rain shadow, blocking Pacific moisture and creating a dry, grassy "Beringia" refuge with less snowfall despite its northern latitude. Greenland acts like a continental center for ice accumulation, whereas Alaska's interior is too dry and far from ocean moisture for massive, permanent ice sheets to form, relying more on alpine glaciers.

Why Greenland Has Ice (South of the Arctic Circle):

• Moisture Source: Warm, moist air from the North Atlantic (influenced by the Gulf Stream's warmer waters) feeds moisture into the Greenland region, leading to heavy snowfall.
• Land Mass & Elevation: Greenland's large landmass, especially its high central plateau, allows for immense ice accumulation, creating a massive ice sheet that extends far south.
• Cold Ocean Currents: Cold currents circulating around Greenland keep surrounding ocean waters frigid, limiting summer melt and promoting ice retention.

Why Interior Alaska Didn't (North of the Arctic Circle):

• Brooks Range Rain Shadow: The towering Brooks Range mountains block moisture coming from the Pacific Ocean, creating a dry interior (a "rain shadow") where less snow falls, notes USGS.
• Beringia (Ice-Free Corridor): During the Ice Age, lower sea levels exposed the Bering Land Bridge, making interior Alaska part of a vast, dry, grassy plain (Beringia) that was home to animals and plants, not glaciers.
• Continental Interior Effect: Areas far from oceans experience greater temperature swings and less moisture, hindering large-scale ice sheet formation, explains Reddit users.

In Summary: Greenland is a large, moist, and cold island that accumulates vast ice sheets, while interior Alaska, despite being Arctic, is too dry and shielded by mountains to host comparable ice caps, instead supporting unique dry tundra during glacial periods.

 

[ding]

600 miles to the pole is that one piece of evidence, and nobody can refute it.

It was just explained to you.

 

[ding]

Why does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9+ times the ice of the other, the Arctic?

The Antarctic has a vastly greater volume of ice (roughly 9 times more) than the Arctic primarily because it is a continent with a massive, high-elevation ice sheet, while the Arctic is primarily an ocean basin covered by floating sea ice.

Key Geographical and Climatic Differences

• Geography: The fundamental difference is geography. The Arctic is an ocean surrounded by landmasses, allowing ice to grow to a certain extent on the water's surface, constrained by the surrounding continents. Antarctica, however, is a large continent, isolated by the Southern Ocean, which allows for the accumulation of ice on solid ground over millions of years.
• Ice Type and Thickness:
  • Antarctica has a land-based ice sheet (glacial ice) that is incredibly thick, averaging about 2 kilometers (over a mile) high, with the South Pole itself at an elevation of over 9,000 feet. This accumulated snowfall and ice makes up the vast majority of the Earth's permanent ice volume.
  • The Arctic mainly consists of floating sea ice, which is much thinner—typically 2 to 3 meters (6 to 9 feet) thick. The thickness of the ice is limited because the ocean flows underneath it, transferring some heat and preventing massive vertical accumulation like on land.
• Temperature and Isolation: Antarctica is significantly colder than the Arctic due to its high elevation and the strong Antarctic Circumpolar Current, which acts as a thermal barrier, preventing warmer ocean waters from reaching the continent's coast. The Arctic, by contrast, has ocean currents (like the Gulf Stream extension) that bring warmer water into the region, moderating temperatures and leading to more melting.
• Ice Dynamics: In the Arctic, ocean currents and winds can push the sea ice away into warmer latitudes where it melts, making room for new, younger ice to form. In Antarctica, the landmass anchors the ice, allowing it to build up into thick, enormous ice sheets and ice shelves, which only flow slowly to the ocean's edge via glaciers.

The result of these differences is that the Antarctic Ice Sheet is the largest single mass of ice on Earth, holding about 90% of the world's freshwater ice. If it were all to melt, global sea levels would rise by nearly 58 meters, whereas the melting of all Arctic ice (excluding the Greenland ice sheet) would have a much smaller effect.

 

[Mashmont]

It's welcome has worn out.
The hysterically motivated flocked
as lemmings to the promise of controlling weather.

But it's going to take a lot of money

The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism - Newsweek The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism

Anyway we do have better things to do with our time and money.
Our money

It was as stupid
as the drowning polar bear
with al gore

It was a manifestation of hysteria,
as always,
driven by the fake news indies.

Unfortunately, this will all be back if the left steals power again.

 

[EMH]

Greenland hosts massive ice sheets due to its vast landmass in the Arctic, proximity to moisture-laden North Atlantic currents (like a branch of the Gulf Stream), and lower summer melt, while interior Alaska remained largely ice-free during the last Ice Age because the Brooks Range created a rain shadow, blocking Pacific moisture and creating a dry, grassy "Beringia" refuge with less snowfall despite its northern latitude. Greenland acts like a continental center for ice accumulation, whereas Alaska's interior is too dry and far from ocean moisture for massive, permanent ice sheets to form, relying more on alpine glaciers.

Why Greenland Has Ice (South of the Arctic Circle):

• Moisture Source: Warm, moist air from the North Atlantic (influenced by the Gulf Stream's warmer waters) feeds moisture into the Greenland region, leading to heavy snowfall.
• Land Mass & Elevation: Greenland's large landmass, especially its high central plateau, allows for immense ice accumulation, creating a massive ice sheet that extends far south.
• Cold Ocean Currents: Cold currents circulating around Greenland keep surrounding ocean waters frigid, limiting summer melt and promoting ice retention.

Why Interior Alaska Didn't (North of the Arctic Circle):

• Brooks Range Rain Shadow: The towering Brooks Range mountains block moisture coming from the Pacific Ocean, creating a dry interior (a "rain shadow") where less snow falls, notes USGS.
• Beringia (Ice-Free Corridor): During the Ice Age, lower sea levels exposed the Bering Land Bridge, making interior Alaska part of a vast, dry, grassy plain (Beringia) that was home to animals and plants, not glaciers.
• Continental Interior Effect: Areas far from oceans experience greater temperature swings and less moisture, hindering large-scale ice sheet formation, explains Reddit users.

In Summary: Greenland is a large, moist, and cold island that accumulates vast ice sheets, while interior Alaska, despite being Arctic, is too dry and shielded by mountains to host comparable ice caps, instead supporting unique dry tundra during glacial periods.

We've had this lie from CO2 FRAUD before...


Annual precipitation in Alaska varies dramatically by region, ranging from over 200 inches in parts of the southeastern rainforest to less than 6 inches in the Arctic. The statewide average is approximately 22.7 inches.

Greenland Average Precipitation

Precipitation in Greenland increased to 526.22 mm in 2024 from 465.26 mm in 2023. This page includes a chart with historical data for Greenland Average Precipitation.

tradingeconomics.com

Precipitation in Greenland increased to 526.22 mm in 2024 from 465.26 mm in 2023. Precipitation in Greenland averaged 440.53 mm from 1901 until 2024, reaching an all time high of 535.68 mm in 1996 and a record low of 362.83 mm in 1985.​

Google Search

www.google.com

17 inches


Alaska gets, on average 5 inches more of H2O precipitation annually vs Greenland


Everything dung just posted is a big CO2 FRAUD taxpayer funded LIE.

 

[EMH]

The Antarctic has a vastly greater volume of ice (roughly 9 times more) than the Arctic primarily because it is a continent with a massive, high-elevation ice sheet, while the Arctic is primarily an ocean basin covered by floating sea ice.

Hence CO2 has NOTHING to do with why one Earth polar circle has 9+ times the ice of the other, NOTHING.

It is 100% about where land is relative to 600 miles to a pole.

 

[ding]

We've had this lie from CO2 FRAUD before...


Annual precipitation in Alaska varies dramatically by region, ranging from over 200 inches in parts of the southeastern rainforest to less than 6 inches in the Arctic. The statewide average is approximately 22.7 inches.

Greenland Average Precipitation

Precipitation in Greenland increased to 526.22 mm in 2024 from 465.26 mm in 2023. This page includes a chart with historical data for Greenland Average Precipitation.

tradingeconomics.com

Precipitation in Greenland increased to 526.22 mm in 2024 from 465.26 mm in 2023. Precipitation in Greenland averaged 440.53 mm from 1901 until 2024, reaching an all time high of 535.68 mm in 1996 and a record low of 362.83 mm in 1985.​

Google Search

www.google.com

17 inches


Alaska gets, on average 5 inches more of H2O precipitation annually vs Greenland


Everything dung just posted is a big CO2 FRAUD taxpayer funded LIE.

You are the CO2 fraud. I'm not going to waste my time explaining to a fly why honey tastes better than shit. I'm happy enough for you to eat shit.

 

[ding]

Hence CO2 has NOTHING to do with why one Earth polar circle has 9+ times the ice of the other, NOTHING.

It is 100% about where land is relative to 600 miles to a pole.

It was just explained to you, dummy.

 

[EMH]

You are the CO2 fraud. I'm not going to waste my time explaining to a fly why honey tastes better than shit. I'm happy enough for you to eat shit.

A SPAZZ when BUSTED LYING AGAIN...

LOL!!!


600 miles to the pole rules, you can't refute it.

 

[ding]

A SPAZZ when BUSTED LYING AGAIN...

LOL!!!


600 miles to the pole rules, you can't refute it.

I already did, dummy.

 

[EMH]

I already did, dummy.

What piece of land within 600 miles to an Earth pole is not in ice age?

What piece of land outside of 600 miles to an Earth pole is in ice age?


100% correlation you cannot refute.

Faux Skeptic taxpayer funded CO2 FRAUD liar, you are...

 

[ding]

What piece of land within 600 miles to an Earth pole is not in ice age?

What piece of land outside of 600 miles to an Earth pole is in ice age?


100% correlation you cannot refute.

Faux Skeptic taxpayer funded CO2 FRAUD liar, you are...

It's already been explained to you in detail. You must be a moron.

 

[EMH]

^^^^^^

Can't refute 600 miles to the pole...

Busted lying about precipitation Greenland vs Alaska


IS a taxpayer funded CO2 FRAUD "faux skeptic" like Toddster and Westwall. And if you notice all three are Jewish, you are "anti semitic" for noticing too much truth...

 

[ding]

^^^^^^

Can't refute 600 miles to the pole...

Busted lying about precipitation Greenland vs Alaska


IS a taxpayer funded CO2 FRAUD "faux skeptic" like Toddster and Westwall. And if you notice all three are Jewish, you are "anti semitic" for noticing too much truth...

I already did, dummy.

 

[Redfish]

70 degrees on January 6th in Wichita KS.

It's still here, and getting worse.

even if true, we are not causing it and cannot stop or reverse it. But you are free to send your money to prophet algore.

 

[EMH]

I already did, dummy.

WHERE?

Where is there land that violates 600 miles?

That's right, there is NO LAND ON EARTH that refutes it.

 

[ding]

WHERE?

Where is there land that violates 600 miles?

That's right, there is NO LAND ON EARTH that refutes it.

Yes, glaciers exist far from the poles, found in high mountain ranges on every continent except Australia, like the Himalayas, Andes (even tropical ones), and Rockies, because high altitude creates cold enough conditions for snow to accumulate and form ice, even near the equator. While most glacial ice is polar, these mountain glaciers, though smaller, are significant freshwater sources, as seen with Asian glaciers feeding rivers to billions, notes the USGS.

Where Glaciers Exist Beyond Polar Regions:

• South America: The Andes Mountains host significant glaciers, including some of the world's largest tropical glaciers.
• Asia: The Himalayas and Hindu Kush have vast glaciers that are crucial for river systems.
• North America: The Rocky Mountains and Alaska have numerous glaciers.
• Africa: Mount Kilimanjaro near the equator has glaciers at its summit due to extreme altitude.
• Oceania: New Zealand and Western New Guinea have glaciers.

Why They Form Far From Poles:

• Altitude: Temperatures decrease with height, allowing snow to persist year-round above a certain elevation (the snowline), which is very high near the equator but lowers towards the poles.
• More Snow Than Melt: Glaciers form where more snow falls in winter than melts in summer, creating glacial ice.

So, while the vast majority of Earth's ice is polar, glaciers thrive in high-altitude zones across the globe, well beyond 600 miles from the poles.

 

[Mushroom]

Every winter the northern hemisphere gets a stark reminder of just how far it is possible for glaciers to extend when the next glacial period is triggered.

Not really, because we know snowfall can extend quite deep into most of North America. Yet the evidence of over 3 million years of glacial cycles show that other than around New England and the Great Lakes they barely extend beyond the US-Canada Border.

I have seen six foot deep snow drifts in my yard in North Carolina, and gone through sub-zero temperatures in Texas. Does not mean those would ever be covered by glaciation short of another Cryogenian era like we had 635+ mya.