What ever happened to that ridiculous climate change hoax.

[Etymology gaslight]

Here are some basic facts, you silly ass;

Hansen et al. 1981​

Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

• Get PDF (2.6 MB. Document is scanned, no OCR.)
• PDF documents require the free Adobe Reader or compatible viewing software to be viewed.
• Go to journal webpage

Export citation: [ BibTeX ] [ RIS ]

The Northwest Passage opened for the first time in 2007. In 2016, a thousand passenger luxury cruise ship made the Passage.

What's the average number in the New York phone book ?

Your a sampling climate minutia is selective.
The internet and cells phone make every tornado the worst in history.
Al Gore Corp make chicken little a house jold name.

Your assays are fluff, they continue to be fluff.

We can't take money
from the workers who
barely even survive
then
forced fed pie in the sky shit
that "people are fixing the weather".

I think it's criminal.

Realocating real minimum wage work
to fly around first class the hyperpedantic,
supporting the asshole rich living
Democrat club of the sons, and their cause celeb.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

How does solar energy reach Earth's core? ... you seem confused ... in addition to the sunlight, we also have internal heat ... mostly from the original gravitational collapse and the rest from nuclear decay ...

HAW HAW HAW HAW ... the sun does heat magma chambers miles below the Earth's surface ... AI hath deceiveth thee once again, child ...

How does the sun heat the earth's core ?
My dad would say "fine:.

 

[ReinyDays]

How does the sun heat the earth's core ?
My dad would say "fine:.

Typo ...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How many trillions do we need to waste on wind and solar, according to the mutually supportive evidence?

You tell us. Your mommy doesn't work here.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Let's start over.
My "phobia"
You used denial & irrational in the same sentence.
What facts are we talking about ?
Let's begin with "average temperature".



This is smarter than both of us.

Oregon Petition - Wikipedia Oregon Petition - Wikipedia

Wow i tried to find my dad's name & found this.
Wikipedia treats it as a bad book review.
That's scary, google just buries it.

This is why we have climate change & chicken little all at the same time.

People don't want their paychecks going to "settled science".

Taking food out of taxpayers mouths.

For what, it's a joke & the joke is on Democrat hysteria.

I have no interest in what a random, uneducated slob has to say about climate science.

Sorry.

 

[Mushroom]

Not only did Bill Gates come out saying it was all overblown but even Greta Thunberg hasn't been fighting to save the planet anymore.

She simply turned to blame something else, one that has long been a favorite group to be hated.

The Jews.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She simply turned to blame something else, one that has long been a favorite group to be hated.

The Jews.

Well there's the single digit IQ take.

 

[Mushroom]

Google "what would happen if the AMOC collapsed?"

The funny thing is that is actually a relatively "modern" current.

Prior to 3.6 mya, the current diverged strongly just north of the equator, with a much weaker current moving north along the North American coastline and the rest going into the Pacific. And large oceans as well as large oceans conjoined with a free passage around the equator are actually the "normal" for our planet.

They for some reason absolutely hate to recognize that we are actually in the coldest 3 million years of the planet since the Cryogenian some 650 mya. Or that even in the last 3.6 my, we are in the coldest interglacial on record.

 

[ding]

I have no interest in what a random, uneducated slob has to say about climate science.

Sorry.

What's your level of education?

 

[Mushroom]

What's your level of education?

Does not matter, anybody is obviously stupid if they do not believe their new religion.

The irony is, I could not care less what the "climate" is. I see trends of a couple of years, decades, even centuries to be completely insignificant. Unless you are talking about timespans that start to come close to 50-100,000 years, anything brought up is absolutely worthless.

 

[ding]

The funny thing is that is actually a relatively "modern" current.

Prior to 3.6 mya, the current diverged strongly just north of the equator, with a much weaker current moving north along the North American coastline and the rest going into the Pacific. And large oceans as well as large oceans conjoined with a free passage around the equator are actually the "normal" for our planet.

They for some reason absolutely hate to recognize that we are actually in the coldest 3 million years of the planet since the Cryogenian some 650 mya. Or that even in the last 3.6 my, we are in the coldest interglacial on record.

Exactly. It's insane how much relevant climate history they are ignoring.

 

[ding]

Does not matter, anybody is obviously stupid if they do not believe their new religion.

Agreed but his shtick is that no one should question authority because we aren't educated or intelligent enough to do so. He runs away every time I ask him that question.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What's your level of education?

Irrelevant. But dont take my word for climate science facts. Defers to the experts.

 

[ding]

Irrelevant. But dont take my word for climate science facts. Defers to the experts.

It isn't irrelevant If you are arguing my educational level is relevant, then so is yours. I'm a degreed engineer who has studied paleo-climates for over 20 years. I am qualified to speak on this subject. What are your qualifications to speak on this subject?

 

[ding]

But dont take my word for climate science facts. Defers to the experts.

Let's see what Google AI has to say about your idiotic belief that no one should question the work of climate scientists.

Climate scientists don't believe no one should question them; questioning and rigorous testing are fundamental to science, but they emphasize that the overwhelming consensus (97-99%) among experts, supported by major scientific bodies, confirms human activities are the primary cause of recent climate change, a reality often challenged by political/economic interests. While healthy scientific debate explores details, the core finding of human-caused warming is robust, and scientists often find it frustrating when this consensus is misrepresented as ongoing fundamental disagreement to sow doubt.
Key Points:

• Consensus vs. Debate: There's a clear distinction between debating finer points (e.g., precise regional impacts) and questioning the core conclusion that humans are warming the planet.
• Science Relies on Questioning: The scientific method thrives on scrutiny, peer review, and testing, which is how the current understanding of climate change was developed and strengthened.
• "Consensus" Misused: The term "consensus" is sometimes used by those seeking to downplay the issue, but for climate scientists, it reflects a strong, evidence-based agreement on fundamental facts.
• Evidence-Based: Scientific consensus isn't a vote; it's the result of consistent findings from multiple lines of evidence, from atmospheric data to ice core samples.
• Challenges to Trust: While the science is clear, trust in scientists can vary across demographics, often influenced by political or economic factors, leading to efforts to sow doubt.

In essence, climate scientists welcome rigorous questioning that advances understanding but counter misinformation that suggests the basic science is unsettled.

Now **** off.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

I have no interest in what a random, uneducated slob has to say about climate science.

Sorry.

You're

Typo ...

No the earth's only heat is stored, like a giant blue battery floating through space at the speed of time.
The earth, our earth doesn't generate energy. By
definition it can't

Once the volcano is through
Ahh...ahh.
The global warming court
missed obama's father
& physics.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It isn't irrelevant If you are arguing my educational level is relevant

But I am not the one spouting dumb shit about climate science.

You are.

So yes, the fact that you are an uneducated slob with no relevant education or experience is relevant, to the dumb shit you're are spouting.

I'm just honest enough to admit it, about myself. You watched too many YouTube videos and read too many blogs and fooled yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No the earth's only heat is stored, like a giant blue battery floating through space at the speed of time.
The earth, our earth doesn't generate energy. By
definition it can't

So what?

 

[ding]

But I am not the one spouting dumb shit about climate science.

You are.

So yes, the fact that you are an uneducated slob with no relevant education or experience is relevant, to the dumb shit you're are spouting.

I'm just honest enough to admit it, about myself. You watched too many YouTube videos and read too many blogs and fooled yourself.

Name one thing that you believe I have said that is dumb.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Name one thing that you believe I have said that is dumb.

Every bit of it can be dismissed out of hand, and i can defer to experts.

It's just so simple and correct to do so.