What ever happened to that ridiculous climate change hoax.

What ever happened to your brain? Are you incapable of reading scientific papers? Or perhaps you are one of the "Them thar pointy headed librul scientists don't know nuttin' " people. LOL Too bad this nation has a surplus of willfully ignorant fools like you.
Freakish deniers... uneducated slobs who watched a YouTube video and think they outsmarted the global scientific community...

This is a uniquely American phenomenon, in its scale. We need to come to terms with the fact that we are a nation of morons.

Other countries have already figured this out, about us.
 
Freakish deniers... uneducated slobs who watched a YouTube video and think they outsmarted the global scientific community...

This is a uniquely American phenomenon, in its scale. We need to come to terms with the fact that we are a nation of morons.

Other countries have already figured this out, about us.
What's uniquely American ?
 
Freakish deniers... uneducated slobs who watched a YouTube video and think they outsmarted the global scientific community...

This is a uniquely American phenomenon, in its scale. We need to come to terms with the fact that we are a nation of morons.

Other countries have already figured this out, about us.
Some of us are actually well educated and have good reasons to believe there is no climate catastrophe. I think even Bill Gates is saying that now.

There’s a doomsday view of climate change that goes like this:

In a few decades, cataclysmic climate change will decimate civilization. The evidence is all around us—just look at all the heat waves and storms caused by rising global temperatures. Nothing matters more than limiting the rise in temperature. Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong.

 
Some of us are actually well educated and have good reasons to believe there is no climate catastrophe. I think even Bill Gates is saying that now.
I'm digging in to it be for i repost in politics,
when people tell me climate change isn't politcal, that simple act tells me it is.

Science reconstructed doesn't sound good.

Which leads me to record keeping.
Also.

personal note.
I'm using kansas as an example.
It's a wonderful place with incredible people & geographically centered.
I appreciate the poster from Kansas,
got me thinking.
scott e.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260109_145802_Google.webp
    Screenshot_20260109_145802_Google.webp
    96.9 KB · Views: 9
Some of us are actually well educated and have good reasons to believe there is no climate catastrophe.
No, zero of you exist, which is why no science is being published to support your irrational denial.

You just fluff each other in the discredited denier blogosphere and think it means something.

It doesn't.
 
Our embarrassing tumor of climate science deniers. But really, the more general idea of a bunch of morons who hold contempt for the experts, in many different areas.
This is what we're ignoring,
the vernacular.

I hold contempt for no scientists
scientists should hold none for me for debating any salient point.

There are people in this thread,
that know physics, science & debate. subfortunately you are not among them.
sorry bro, bring us the math, we will too.

Otherwise this is all you have.
 

Attachments

  • ffb0de3b54f64fa1740ce89dbae16525.webp
    ffb0de3b54f64fa1740ce89dbae16525.webp
    55.5 KB · Views: 8
Our embarrassing tumor of climate science deniers. But really, the more general idea of a bunch of morons who hold contempt for the experts, in many different areas.

We must spend trillions on less reliable, more expensive energy to reduce CO2 a tiny bit.
While China, India and third world countries use more energy to pull their people out of poverty
and increase CO2 at levels which will easily swamp our tiny reduction.

We're saved!
 
We must spend trillions on less reliable, more expensive energy to reduce CO2 a tiny bit.
While China, India and third world countries use more energy to pull their people out of poverty
and increase CO2 at levels which will easily swamp our tiny reduction.

We're saved!
Houseplants & palmtrees
are protesting everywhere.
organic life matters.
 
We must spend trillions on less reliable, more expensive energy to reduce CO2 a tiny bit.
While China, India and third world countries use more energy to pull their people out of poverty
and increase CO2 at levels which will easily swamp our tiny reduction.

We're saved!
Irrelevant to irrational denial of what the mountains of mutually supportive evidemce say.

What you describe is a debate for politicians. Honest politicians will say they do not care or do care.
 
No, zero of you exist, which is why no science is being published to support your irrational denial.

You just fluff each other in the discredited denier blogosphere and think it means something.

It doesn't.
This would be a good time to share your climate cv. How do you know they're right ?
even if it's just made up, like climate change.
 
How do you know they're right ?
I trust they are right, based on the mountains of evidence of the successes of rigorous science.

You doubt them based.on irrational reasons spoonfed to you by a cottage industry funded by the fossil fuel industry.
 
15th post
Which you are not doing.

You are being a contrarian. You dont know enough about this topic to debate any scientist with experience in any related field.
How could you know that.
again
my own father signed the oregon petition.
I'm pretty sure you have no idea what that is.
(try bing. google cooks anything anti CC.)

You remind me of bernie's famous quote i heard from morristown vt town hall.

"Okay, so ... ahh you have all of the scientists of the world agreeing on this on one side. and Rush Limbaugh on the other."
true sory on video.

Bernie's not the sharpest knife in the communist drawer, i did call him out on it
no response.

You remind me of that.
What separates this thread from
most of the others, is that "science" is being discussed and you are dancing all around it.

What about that ?

Please don't tell me you're
John Coleman's kid.

that would be embarrassing for everyone.
 
Last edited:
Irrelevant to irrational denial of what the mountains of mutually supportive evidemce say.

What you describe is a debate for politicians. Honest politicians will say they do not care or do care.

How many trillions do we need to waste on wind and solar, according to the mutually supportive evidence?
 
Back
Top Bottom